SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

The relationship between functionality, performance, reaction time and quality of life in the elderly

Yaşlı bireylerde fonksiyonellik, performans ve reaksiyon zamanı ile yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişki

Feray GÖKDOĞAN
Necmiye ÜN YILDIRIM
Nuriye ÖZENGİL
Özlem ÇINAR ÖZDEMİR
Pages
68–74
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A significant negative relation was found between the Nottingham total scores and functionality and performance (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between functionality, performance, reaction time and the quality of life in the elderly.Materials and Method: The study sample consisted of 98 subjects 65 years of age and over.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In addition, the lower extremity performance was measured by chair sit-to-stand test, functionality was assessed by stair climb power test, and the reaction time was measured by Newtest Reaction Timer.Results: The mean age of the participants was 73.24±6.10 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A significant negative relation was found between the Nottingham total scores and functionality and performance (p
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between functionality, performance, reaction time and the quality of life in the elderly.Materials and Method: The study sample consisted of 98 subjects 65 years of age and over. A survey was conducted to identify their demographic features. Mini Mental State Test was administered to evaluate cognitive functioning levels of the subjects, and their quality of life was evaluated by Nottingham Health Profile. In addition, the lower extremity performance was measured by chair sit-to-stand test, functionality was assessed by stair climb power test, and the reaction time was measured by Newtest Reaction Timer.Results: The mean age of the participants was 73.24±6.10 years. Of the subjects 51% were male, 40% were married and 51% had primary education. A significant negative relation was found between the Nottingham total scores and functionality and performance (p

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışma yaşlı bireylerde fonksiyonellik, performans ve reaksiyon zamanı ile yaşam kalitesi arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 65 yaş ve üzeri 98 birey dahil edilmiştir. Araştırmaya dahil edilen yaşlı bireylerin demografik özelliklerini belirlemek için bir anket yapılmıştır. Çalışma grubunun bilişsel fonksiyon düzeyleri Mini Mental Durum Testi ile yaşam kaliteleri Nottingham Sağlık Profili Anketi ile alt ekstremite performansları sandalyeden otur-kalk testi ile fonksiyonel düzeyleri basamak testi ile basit reaksiyon zamanları ise New Test reaksiyon zaman ölçeği kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: Araştırmaya katılan yaşlı bireylerin yaş ortalaması 73.24±6.10 yıldır. Katılanların %51'i erkek, %40'ı evli, %51'i ilkokulu bitirmişlerdir. Nottingham toplam skoru ile performans ve fonksiyonellik arasında negatif yönlü anlamlı bir ilişki bulunurken (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKDOĞAN, F., YILDIRIM, N. Ü., ÖZENGİL, N., ÖZDEMİR, Ö. Ç. (2022). The relationship between functionality, performance, reaction time and quality of life in the elderly. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 68–74. https://ajindex.com/articles/624030

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Lloyd-Sherlock P. Population aging in developed and developing regions: implications for health policy. Soc Sci Med 2000; 51:887–95
  2. Miszko TA, Cress ME, Slade JM, Covey CJ, Agrawal SK, Doerr CE. Effect of strength and power training on physical function in community-dwelling older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58(2):171–5
  3. Katula JA, Rejeski WJ, Marsh AP. Enhancing quality of life in older adults: A comparison of muscular strength and power training. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008;6:45–51
  4. Bean JF, Leveille SG, Kiely DK, Bandinelli S, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L. A comparison of leg power and leg strength within the InCHIANTI Study: which influences mobility more? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2003;58:728–33
  5. Eser SY, Fidaner H, Fidaner C, Elbi H, Eser E, Göker E. Yaşam kalitesinin ölçülmesi: WHOQOL–100 ve WHOQOLBREF. Psikiyatri Psikoloji Psikofarmakoloji Dergisi 1999;7: 5–13.6. Holtkamp CC, Kerkstra A, Ribbe MW, Van Campen C, Ooms ME. The relation between quality of co-ordination of nursing care and quality of life in Dutch nursing homes. J Adv Nurs 2000;32(6):1364–73
  6. Sonn U. Longitudinal studies of dependence in daily life activities among elderly persons. Scand J Rehabil Med Suppl 1996;34:1–35
  7. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, Yaşar R, Engin F. Standardize Mini Mental Test’in Türk Toplumunda Hafif Demans Tanısında Geçerlik ve Güvenilirliği. Turk Psikiyatri Derg 2002;13(4):273–81
  8. Küçükdeveci AA, McKenna SP, Kutlay S, Gürsel Y, Whalley D, Arasil T. The development and psychometric assessment of the Turkish version of the Nottingham Health Profile. Int J Rehabil Res 2000;23(1):31-8
  9. Purath J, Buchholz SW, Kark DL. Physical fitness assessment of older adults in the primary care setting. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2009;21(2):101–7
  10. Fahlman M, Morgan A, McNevin N, Topp R, Boardley D. Combination training and resistance training as effective interventions to improve functioning in elders. J Aging Phys Act 2007;15:195-205
  11. Bean JF, Kiely DK, LaRose S, Alian J, Frontera WR. Is stair climb power a clinically relevant measure of leg power impairments in at-risk older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(5):604–9
  12. Tamer K. Sporda Fiziksel Fizyolojik Performansın Ölçülmesi ve Değerlendirilmesi. 2.Basım, Bağırgan Yayınevi, Ankara 2000, pp 52–60
  13. Alpar R. Spor Bilimlerinde Uygulamalı İstatistik
  14. Basım, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım, Ankara, 2006, pp 7–340
  15. Takata Y, Ansai T, Soh I, et al. Quality of life and physical fitness