SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1

“Yaşlılarda diyabetin yuku ölceği”nin Turk toplumu icin gecerlik ve guvenirliğine ilişkin bir calışma

A study of the validity and reliability of the “Elderly Diabetes Burden scale” for the Turkish society

Yasemin USTA YILDIRIM
Aynur ESEN
Pages
61–67
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In conclusion, “Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale” measuring instrument has been found as reliable and valid for the Turkish society.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: This study was realized methodologically with the objective of examining the validity and reliability of the “Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale”, which was developed in 2003 by Araki and Ito, to determine the burdens stemming from diabetes mellitus in elderly individuals with diabetes, for the Turkish society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: In the study, based on the fact that the size of the sampling in validity and reliability studies should be a minimum of five-fold and moreover, ideally ten-fold the number of items, 230 elderly diabetics were contacted for the 22-item “Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In conclusion, “Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale” measuring instrument has been found as reliable and valid for the Turkish society.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: This study was realized methodologically with the objective of examining the validity and reliability of the “Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale”, which was developed in 2003 by Araki and Ito, to determine the burdens stemming from diabetes mellitus in elderly individuals with diabetes, for the Turkish society. Materials and Method: In the study, based on the fact that the size of the sampling in validity and reliability studies should be a minimum of five-fold and moreover, ideally ten-fold the number of items, 230 elderly diabetics were contacted for the 22-item “Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale”. Results: At the end of the factor analysis applied to the scale, 6 factors were obtained, which explored 74.8% of the total variance of the scale. The Cronbach’s alpha value was found to be 0.92 for the internal consistency of the scale and this value shows that the scale is highly reliable. Conclusion: In conclusion, “Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale” measuring instrument has been found as reliable and valid for the Turkish society.

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışma, yaşlı bireylerin diyabet hastalığından kaynaklanan yüklerini belirlemek için Araki ve Ito tarafından 2003 yılında geliştirilen “Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale-Yaşlılarda Diyabetin Yükü Ölçeği”nin Türk toplumu için geçerlik ve güvenirliğini incelemek amacı ile metodolojik olarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmada geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmalarındaki örneklem büyüklüğü madde sayısının en az beş katı ya da ideal olarak 10 katı olması gerektiği bilgisini temel alarak, 22 maddeli “Yaşlılarda Diyabetin Yükü Ölçeği-Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale” için 230 yaşlı diyabetik ile görüşülmüştür. Bulgular: Ölçeğe uygulanan faktör analizi sonucunda ölçeğin toplam varyansın %74.8’ini açıklayan 6 faktör elde edilmiştir. Ölçeğin iç tutarlılığı için Cronbach Alpha değeri 0.92 bulunmuştur ve bu değer ölçeğin yüksek düzeyde güvenilir olduğunu göstermektedir. Sonuç: “Yaşlılarda Diyabetin Yükü Ölçeği-Elderly Diabetes Burden Scale” ölçme aracının ”nin Türk toplumu için geçerli ve güvenilir olduğu saptanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, Y. U., ESEN, A. (2022). “Yaşlılarda diyabetin yuku ölceği”nin Turk toplumu icin gecerlik ve guvenirliğine ilişkin bir calışma. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 1, 61–67. https://ajindex.com/articles/624016

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aksoydan E. Are developing countries ready for ageing populations? an examination on the socio-demographic, economic and health status of elderly in Turkey. Turkish Journal of Geriatrics 2009;12 (2):102-9
  2. Buken, N. Aged Population From Ethical Perspective, in An Ethical Look to Life, Ankara Medical Association Publications. 2002, pp 133-56
  3. Canbaz S, Sunter TA, Dabak S, et al. The Prevalence of Chronic Diseases and Quality of Life in Elderly People in Samsun. Turk J Med Sci 2003;33:335-40
  4. Satman İ, Yılmaz T, Şengül A, et al. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: result of the Turkish diabetes epidemiology study (TURDEP)”. Diabetes Care 2002; 25(9):1551-6. (PMID:12196426)
  5. Araki A, Ito H. Development of elderly diabetes burden scale for elderly patients with diabetes mellitus”. Geriatrics and Gerontology International 2003; 3(4):212-24. PMID:8865739 6. Miura H, Satake S, Fujisawa M, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment for management of the elderly with diabetes mellitus. Japanese Journal of Clinical Medicine Jan 2006;64(1):106-11. (PMID:16408456)
  6. Sinclair AJ. Aging and diabetes mellitus. In: Defronzo RA, Ferrannini E, Keen H, et al., eds. International Textbook of Diabetes Mellitus. 3rd ed. Vol
  7. England: John Wiley & Sons Ltd., 2004, pp 1579-97
  8. Özdamar K. Package programs and statistical data analysis. 5th ed. Eskişehir, Kaan Kitabevi Yayını, 2004, pp 213-78
  9. Ertan T, Eker E, Sar V. The validity and reliability of the geriatric depression scale in the elderly Turkish population. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi 1997;34(2):62-71
  10. Güngen C, Ertan T, Eker E, et al. The validity and reliability of the standardized mini mental test in the diagnosis of mild dementia in the Turkish society. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi 2002;13(4):273-81. (PMID:12794644)
  11. Carlson ED. A case study in translation methodology using the health promotion lifestyle profile. Public Health Nursing 2000;17(1):61-70. (PMID:10675054)
  12. Gözüm S, Aksayan S. Guide II for adapting intercultural scales: psychometric characteristics and intercultural comparisons. Hemşirelikte Araşt›rma Geliştirme Dergisi 2003;5(1):3-14
  13. Öner N. The psychological tests used in Turkey. 3rd ed. Istanbul, Publications of Bogaziçi University, 1997, pp 9-18
  14. Karasar N. Scientific research method. 7th ed. Ankara, Sim Matbaas›, 1995, pp 147-53
  15. Öner N. Psychological tests for testing reliability and/or validity. 3rd ed. Istanbul, Publications of B