AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightThe single dose anesthesia group was administered 12.5 mg isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%), and the continuous spinal anesthesia group was administered isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) at 2.5 mg doses intrathecaly subsequent to a starting dose of 5 mg, until the T10 level of analgesia was achieved.Results: The amount of levobupivacaine was lower in the continuous spinal anesthesia group (p
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Abstract
Introduction: Single dose and continuous spinal anesthesia with levobupivacaine were compared regarding quality of anesthesia, hemodynamic parameters, and potential complications ingeriatric patients scheduled for transurethral resection.Materials and Method: Sixty geriatric patients scheduled for transurethral resection weredivided into two groups as single dose spinal anesthesia (n=30) and continuous spinal anesthesia (n=30). The single dose anesthesia group was administered 12.5 mg isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%), and the continuous spinal anesthesia group was administered isobaric levobupivacaine (0.5%) at 2.5 mg doses intrathecaly subsequent to a starting dose of 5 mg, until the T10 level of analgesia was achieved.Results: The amount of levobupivacaine was lower in the continuous spinal anesthesia group (p
Özet
Giriş: Transüretral rezeksiyon planlanan geriatrik hastalarda anestezi kalitesi, hemodinamikparametreler ve olası komplikasyonlar açısından, intratekal levobupivakain ile tek doz ve süreklispinal anestezi uygulamaları karşılaştırıldı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Transuretral rezeksiyon planlanan 60 geriatrik hasta tek doz spinal anestezi (n=30) ve sürekli spinal anestezi (n=30) olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Tek doz spinal anestezi grubuna 12.5 mg izobarik levobupivakain (%0.5), sürekli spinal anestezi grubuna 5 mg başlangıç dozundan sonra T10 düzeyinde analjeziye ulaşıncaya kadar 2.5 mg dozlarda izobarik levobupivakain (%0.5) intratekal uygulandı.Bulgular: Levobupivakain miktarı sürekli spinal anestezi grubunda daha düşüktü (p