Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3

GERİATRİK HASTALARDA İNTRAOPERATİF ZOR MASKE VENTİLASYONU SIKLIĞININ VE NEDENLERİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI

INVESTIGATING THE FREQUENCY AND CAUSES OF DIFFICULT MASK VENTILATION IN INTRAOPERATIVE IN GERIATRIC PATIENTS

Pages
238–245
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, 68.9% of patients had no teeth, whereas 31.1% had normal teeth/fixed prosthesis. 32.7% of patients had grade 1 difficult mask ventilation, 54.7% had grade 2 and 12.6% hadgrade 3 difficult mask ventilation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The sunken cheeks of edentulous elderly patients may cause mask ventilationto be ineffective or even impossible.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: This study was completed prospectively in 8 months, and included264 patients that were >=65 years old, undergoing elective operations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, 68.9% of patients had no teeth, whereas 31.1% had normal teeth/fixed prosthesis. 32.7% of patients had grade 1 difficult mask ventilation, 54.7% had grade 2 and 12.6% hadgrade 3 difficult mask ventilation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The sunken cheeks of edentulous elderly patients may cause mask ventilationto be ineffective or even impossible. The aim of this study was to identify the frequency and causes of difficult mask ventilation in geriatric patients. Materials and Method: This study was completed prospectively in 8 months, and included264 patients that were >=65 years old, undergoing elective operations. Difficult mask ventilationform 1 (demographic data, mouth opening measurements, mallampati score, thyromental andsternomental distance, mandibular protrusion test, neck movement and circumference, the presence of beard in male patients and their dental situation) and difficult mask ventilation form 2(their experience as a mask ventilation user, difficulty of mask ventilation, using the opioid/neuromuscular blocker agent in induction of anaesthesia and maintenance of the airway) werecompleted. Results: Surgical intervention was performed in 7948 (29%) patients aged 65 years and above. A total of 254 patients were included in the study. Patients were mean aged 72±6 and 58.7%male. Overall, 68.9% of patients had no teeth, whereas 31.1% had normal teeth/fixed prosthesis. 32.7% of patients had grade 1 difficult mask ventilation, 54.7% had grade 2 and 12.6% hadgrade 3 difficult mask ventilation. Grade 4 difficult mask ventilation was not observed. In malepatients had beard 26.2% in grade 1, 46.3% in grade 2 and 66.7% had in grade 3 difficult maskventilation. Conclusion: In this study, the incidence of difficult mask ventilation in the geriatric patientpopulation was 12.6%. The independent risk factors for difficult mask ventilation were identified as male gender, thickened neck circumference, the presence of a beard in male patients andthe experience of the anaesthesiologist

Özet

Giriş: Yaşlı ve dişsiz hastalarda yanakların çökük olması nedeniyle maske ventilasyonu efektif olmayabilir hatta imkansızlaşabilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı geriatrik hastalarda zor maske ventilasyonun sıklığının ve nedenlerinin saptanmasıdır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma, 8 aylık bir dönemde, prospektif olarak, 65 yaş ve üzeri, 264hasta ile elektif operasyon geçirenlerde yapıldı. Zor maske ventilasyon form 1 (Demografik veriler, mallampati skoru, ağız açıklığı, tiromental ve sternomental mesafe, mandibular protruzyontesti, boyun hareketleri, boyun çevresi, erkek hastalarda sakal bıyık varlığı ve dişlerinin durumu)ve zor maske ventilasyonun form 2 (maske ventilasyonu uygulayıcısının deneyimi, maske ventilasyon zorluğu, indüksiyonunda opioid/nöromuskuler ajan kullanımı, hava yolu idamesinin nasıl yapıldığı) kaydedildi.Bulgular: Altmış beş yaş ve üstü 7948 (%29) hastaya cerrahi girişim yapıldı. Çalışmaya toplam 254 hasta dahil edildi. Hastaların ortalama yaşı 72±6 ve %58,7'si erkek idi. Hastaların%68,9'unun dişsiz, %31,1 dişlerinin normal/sabit protez olduğu gözlendi. Hastaların %32,7'sigrade 1, %54,7'si grade 2 ve %12,6'sı grade 3 zor maske ventilasyonu olarak saptandı. Grade 4zor maske ventilasyonuna hiç rastlanmadı. Erkek hastalarda sakal varlığı %26,2 grade 1, %46,3grade 2 ve %66,7 grade 3 zor maske ventilasyonu olanlarda tespit edildi.Sonuç: Bu çalışmada geriatrik hasta popülasyonunda zor maske ventilasyonu sıklığı %12.6olarak bulundu. Erkek cinsiyet, boyun çevresinin kalın olması, erkek hastalarda sakal varlığı veanestezistin tecrübesi zor maske ventilasyonu için bağımsız risk faktörü olarak saptandı.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNENÇ, F., KÜÇÜKGÜÇLÜ, S., ÖZBİLGİN, Ş., MALTEPE, F., ESKİDEMİR, G. (2022). GERİATRİK HASTALARDA İNTRAOPERATİF ZOR MASKE VENTİLASYONU SIKLIĞININ VE NEDENLERİNİN ARAŞTIRILMASI. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 18 - Sayı: 3, 238–245. https://ajindex.com/articles/623846

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. GE Morgan, MS Mikhail, MJ Murray. Geriatric Anesthesia, In: Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ (Eds). Clinical Anesthe- siology. 4th edition, Lange, Mc Graw Hill, USA 2006, pp 951- 59. Z Kayhan. In special cases related to anesthesia patients, In: Z Kayhan (Eds). Clinical Anesthesia. 3rd edition, Logos, 2007, pp 705-13.
  2. Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper KK, et al. Incidence and predic- tors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesio- logy 2006;105:885-91. (PMID:17065880). Preston SD, Southall AR, Nel M, Das SK. Geriatric surgery is about disease, not age. J R Soc Med 2008;101(8):409-15. (PMID:18687864). Racine SX, Solis A, Hamou NA, et al. Face mask ventilation in edentulous patients: a comparison of mandibular groove and lo- wer lip placement. Anesthesiology 2010;112:1190-3. (PMID:20395823). Han R, Tremper KK, Kheterpal S, O'Reilly M. Grading scale for mask ventilation. Anaesthesiology 2004;101:267. (PMID:15220820). Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, et al; American Society of Anest- hesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology 2013;118(2):251-70. (PMID:23364566). Rose DK, Cohen MM: The airway: Problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Can J Anaesth 1994;41:372-83. (PMID:8055603). Asai T, Koga K, Vaughan RS. Respiratory complications asso- ciated with tracheal intubation and extubation. Br J Anaesth 1998;80:767-75. (PMID:9771306). Nİrskov AK, Rosenstock CV, Wetterslev J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of anaesthesiologists' prediction of difficult airway ma- nagement in daily clinical practice: a cohort study of 188 064 patients registered in the Danish Anaesthesia Database. Anaest- hesia. 2015;70(3):272-81. (PMID:25511370). Golzari SE, Soleimanpour H, Mehryar H et al. Comparison of three methods in improving bag mask ventilation. Int J Prev Med 2014;5(4):489-93. (PMID:24829737). Conlon NP, Sullivan R. The effect of leaving dentures in place on bag-mask ventilation at induction of general anesthesia. Anesth Analg 2007;105:370-3. (PMID:17646492). Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology 2000;92:1229-36. (PMID:10781266). Yildiz TS, Solak M, Toker K. The incidence and risk factors of difficult mask ventilation. J Anesth 2005;19:7-11. (PMID:15674508). El-Orbany M, Woehlck HJ. Difficult mask ventil