Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1

METASTATİK MİDE KANSERLİ YAŞLI HASTALARDA KEMOTERAPİNİN ETKİNLİĞİ VE TOLERABİLİTESİ

EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC GASTRIC CANCER

Pages
27–34
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Disease and patient characteristics, prognostic factors,treatment response, grade 3-4 toxicity related to treatment, progression free survival (PFS), andoverall survival (OS) were evaluated.Results: Of the 89 patients, 65 (73%) were males; median age was 74 (70-84) years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Elderly patients are under-represented in the clinical trials of patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC); therefore, the efficacy and tolerability of palliative chemotherapy areunclear in these patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of first-line palliativechemotherapy in elderly patients (age >=70 years) with metastatic GC.Materials and Method: From 2005 to 2014, 89 patients with metastatic GC who were 70years and older and were treated with at least two cycles of systemic chemotherapy as first-linetreatment were included retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Disease and patient characteristics, prognostic factors,treatment response, grade 3-4 toxicity related to treatment, progression free survival (PFS), andoverall survival (OS) were evaluated.Results: Of the 89 patients, 65 (73%) were males; median age was 74 (70-84) years.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Elderly patients are under-represented in the clinical trials of patients with metastatic gastric cancer (GC); therefore, the efficacy and tolerability of palliative chemotherapy areunclear in these patients. We aimed to assess the efficacy and tolerability of first-line palliativechemotherapy in elderly patients (age >=70 years) with metastatic GC.Materials and Method: From 2005 to 2014, 89 patients with metastatic GC who were 70years and older and were treated with at least two cycles of systemic chemotherapy as first-linetreatment were included retrospectively. Disease and patient characteristics, prognostic factors,treatment response, grade 3-4 toxicity related to treatment, progression free survival (PFS), andoverall survival (OS) were evaluated.Results: Of the 89 patients, 65 (73%) were males; median age was 74 (70-84) years. Themedian follow-up period was 7 months (min-max: 2-57 months), median PFS was 5 months(95% CI: 3.7-6.3), and median OS was 7 months (95 % CI: 5.2-8.9). The disease was controlled in 43.8% patients, whereas progression was observed in 56.2% patients. Univariate analysisshowed that the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, number ofchemotherapy cycles, and response to the first line chemotherapy had a significant effect on PFSand OS; liver metastasis had an effect only on PFS; lung metastasis had an effect only on OS. Conclusion: Fewer chemotherapy cycles, lung metastasis, liver metastasis, and poor ECOGperformance scores were found to be poor prognostic factors.

Özet

Giriş: Yaşlı hastalar klinik çalışmalara alınmadığından metastatik mide kanseri (MK) olan hastalarda kemoterapinin etkinliği ve tolerabilitesi konusunda bilgiler yetersizdir. Bu çalışmada 70 yaşve üstü metastatik MK hastalarında ilk seride verilen palyatif kemoterapinin etkinliğini ve tolerabilitesini araştırmayı amaçladık.Gereç ve Yöntem: 2005-2014 yılları arasında, >=70 yaş, ilk seride en az iki kür kemoterapialan 89 hasta retrospektif incelendi. Hasta özellikleri, prognostik faktörler, tedavi cevabı, grad 34 toksisite, progresyonsuz-sağkalım (PSK) ve genel-sağkalım (GS) değerlendirildi.Bulgular: 89 hastanın 65 (%73)'i erkekti ve medyan yaş 74 'dü. Medyan takip süresi 7 ay (min-max:2-57ay), PSK 5 ay (%95GA:3,7-6,3) ve GS 7 ay (%95GA:5,2-8,9)'dı. Hastalıkkontrolü %43,8'inde sağlanmasına rağmen %52,2'sinde progresyon görüldü. Tek değişkenli analizde Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performans skoru, kemoterapi siklusu ve alınan cevap etkindi. Karaciğer metastazı PSK'da, akciğer metastazı ise GS'da etkindi. Sonuç: Düşük kemoterapi siklusu, akciğer veya karaciğer metastazı ve kötü performans skoru olumsuz prognostik faktörlerdi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ALDEMİR, M. N., YILDIRIM, N., BİLİCİ, M., ÇAYIR, K., ŞİMSEK, M., TEKİN, S. B., YETİMOĞLU, H., TÜRKELİ, M. (2022). METASTATİK MİDE KANSERLİ YAŞLI HASTALARDA KEMOTERAPİNİN ETKİNLİĞİ VE TOLERABİLİTESİ. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 1, 27–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/623775

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Munoz N, Franceschi S. Epidemiology of gastric cancer and perspectives for prevention. Salud Publica Mex 1997;39:318- 30. (PMID:9337564). Kamangar F, Dores GM, Anderson WF. Patterns of cancer in- cidence, mortality, and prevalence across five continents: defi- ning priorities to reduce cancer disparities in different geograp- hic regions of the world. J Clin Oncol 2006;24(14):2137-50. (PMID:16682732). Bruckner HW, Morris JC, Mansfield P. Neoplasms of the sto- mach. In: Bast RC, Kufe DW, Pollock RE et al. (Eds): Cancer Medicine, 5th edition. Hamilton: BC Decker 2000, pp 1355-1390.
  2. Hurria A, Levit LA, Dale W, et al. Improving the Evidence Ba- se for Treating Older Adults With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement. J Clin Oncol 2015;33(32):3826- 33. (PMID:26195697). Balducci L. Studying cancer treatment in the elderly patient po- pulation. Cancer Control 2014;21(3):215-20. (PMID:24955705). Graziano F, Santini D, Testa E, et al. A phase II study of weekly cisplatin, 6S-stereoisomer leucovorin and fluorouracil as first-li- ne chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced gastric can- cer. Br J Cancer 2003;89(8):1428-32. (PMID:14562012).
  3. Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann Oncol 2007;18(3):581-92. (PMID:17287242). Balducci L. Systemic treatment of gastric and esophageal ade- nocarcinoma in elderly patients. J Gastrointest Oncol 2015;6(1):75-8. (PMID:25642340). Lu Z, Lu M, Zhang X, et al. Advanced or metastatic gastric can- cer in elderly patients: clinicopathological, prognostic factors and treatments. Clin Transl Oncol 2013;15(5):376-83. (PMID:23054754). Wagner AD, Unverzagt S, Grothe W, et al. Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;17;(3):CD004064. doi: 10.1002/14651858. CD004064.pub3. Wöhrer SS, Raderer M, Hejna M. Palliative chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer. Ann Oncol 2004;15(11):1585-95. (PMID:15520058). Choi IS, Oh DY, Kim BS, Lee KW, Kim JH, Lee JS. Oxalipla- tin, 5-FU, folinic acid as first-line palliative chemotherapy in elderly patients with metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer. Cancer Res Treat 2007;39(3):99-103. (PMID:19746224). Zhao JG, Qiu F, Xiong JP, et al. A phase II study of modified FOLFOX as first-line chemotherapy in elderly patients with ad- vanced gastric cancer. Anticancer Drugs 2009;20(4):281-6. (PMID:19247179). Santini D, Graziano F, Catalano V, et al. Weekly oxaliplatin, 5- flu