SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE "PERCEPTIONS OF RESTRAINT USE QUESTIONNAIRE" FOR USE IN TURKEY

TESPİT KULLANIMI ALGI ANKETİ"NİN TÜRKİYE'DE KULLANIMI İÇİN GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİĞİ

Türkan KARACA
Emine Derya İSTER
Semiha AYDIN ÖZKAN
Pages
30–37
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It couldbe a useful tool for the assessment of situations when nurses feel the use of physical restraints is necessary

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Perceptionsof Restraint Use Questionnaire, which assesses nurses' perceptions about the use of physicalrestraints when caring for older patients.Materials and Method: Ninety-five nurses working in a university hospital in Adıyamanwere involved in this methodological study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Questionnaire item total scorecorrelation reliability coefficients were found to range between r=0.26 and 0.81.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It couldbe a useful tool for the assessment of situations when nurses feel the use of physical restraints is necessary
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to test the reliability and validity of the Perceptionsof Restraint Use Questionnaire, which assesses nurses' perceptions about the use of physicalrestraints when caring for older patients.Materials and Method: Ninety-five nurses working in a university hospital in Adıyamanwere involved in this methodological study. Questionnaire translation, content validity, internalconsistency, and total item score correlation were conducted for validity and reliability purposes.Results: Six instructors assessed the Questionnaire for the validity analysis. After the pilot study,final revisions were made based on the instructors' suggestions. The Questionnaire item total scorecorrelation reliability coefficients were found to range between r=0.26 and 0.81. The Questionnaireinternal consistency analysis revealed a Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient of ?=0.93. Ananalysis of test-retest time invariance revealed no differences between the two test administrations(p>0.05). Conclusion: The Turkish version of the Questionnaire was found to have acceptablepsychometric features and was adequately adapted to the cultural context of this country. It couldbe a useful tool for the assessment of situations when nurses feel the use of physical restraints is necessary

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı hemşirelerin yaşlı hastalarda fiziksel tespit kullanımı konusundaki algılarını ölçen Tespit Kullanımı Algı Anketi'nin (PRUQ-T) geçerlilik ve güvenirliğini test etmektir.Gereç Yöntem: Metodolojik türde yapılan çalışmaya Adıyaman'da bulunan bir üniversite hastanesinin servislerinde çalışan 95 hemşire alındı. Ölçeğin geçerliğine ilişkin çeviri ve kapsam geçerliği çalışmaları yapılırken güvenirliğine yönelik iç tutarlık ve madde toplam puan korelasyonlarına yapıldı. Bulgular: Ölçeğin geçerliğini değerlendirmede altı öğretim üyesinin görüşü alındı ve öneriler doğrultusunda hazırlanan ölçeğe pilot uygulama sonrası son şekli verildi. Ölçeğin maddelerinin madde toplam puan korelasyon güvenirlik katsayıları r=0.26 - 0.81 arasında saptandı. Ölçeğin iç tutarlık analizinde Cronbach alfa güvenirlik katsayısı ?=0.93 olarak bulundu. Ölçeğin zamana göre değişmezliği test-tekrar test analizi ile incelendiğinde her iki uygulama arasında fark olmadığı saptandı (p>0.05). Sonuç: Tespit Kullanımı Algı Anketi'nin Türkçe formunun psikometrik özelliklerinin iyi düzeyde olduğu ve bu ülkenin kültürel durumuna uygun olduğu saptanmıştır. Hemşirelerin fiziksel tespit kullanımını en gerekli bulduğu durumları değerlendirebilmeleri açısından faydalı bir araç olduğu düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACA, T., İSTER, E. D., ÖZKAN, S. A. (2022). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE "PERCEPTIONS OF RESTRAINT USE QUESTIONNAIRE" FOR USE IN TURKEY. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 30–37. https://ajindex.com/articles/623734

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bray K, Hill K, Robson W, et al. British Association of Critical Care Nurses position statement on the use of restraint in adult critical care units. Nurs Crit Care 2004;9(5):199-11. (PMID:15462118)
  2. Adams D, Allen D. Assessing the need for reactive behaviour management strategies in children with intellectual disability and severe challenging behaviour. J Intellect Disabil Res 2001;45:335-43. (PMID:11489055)
  3. Jones P, Kroese BS. Service users' views of physical restraint procedures in secure settings for people with learning disabilities. Br J Learn Disabil 2007;35:50-4
  4. Allen D, Lowe K., Brophy S, Moore K. Predictors of restrictive reactive strategy use in people with challenging behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2009;22:159-68
  5. Luiselli JK. Physical restraint of people with intellectual disability: a review of implementation reduction and elimination procedures. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2009;22:126-34
  6. Sturmey P. It is time to reduce and safely eliminate restrictive behavioural practices. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 2009;22:105-10
  7. Cotter VT. Restraint free care in older adults with dementia. Keio J Med 2005;54(2):80-4. (PMID:16077257)
  8. Gallinagh R. Slevin E, McCormak B. Side rails as physical restraints in the care of older people: a management issue. J Nurs Manag 2002;10:299-306. (PMID:12191076)
  9. Vassallo M, Wilkinson C, Stockdale R, Malik N, Baker R, Allen S. Attitudes to restraint for the prevention of falls in hospital. Gerontology 2002;51(1):66-70. (PMID:15591759)
  10. Braun JA, Frolik LA. Legal aspects of chemical restraint use in nursing homes. Marquette Elder's Advisor 2000;2(2):70-7
  11. Hofsø K, Coyer FM. Part 2. Chemical and physical restraints in the management of mechanically ventilated patients in the ICU: a patient perspective. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2007;23(6):316-22. (PMID:17512200)
  12. Jacobi J, Fraser GL, Coursin DB. Clinical practice guidelines for the sustained use of sedatives and analgesics in the critically ill adult. Crit Care Med 2002;30:119-41. (PMID:11902253)
  13. Chang LY, Wang KW, Chao YF. Influence of physical restraint on unplanned extubation of adult intensive care parents: a case control study. Am J Crit Care 2008;17 (5): 408-15. (PMID:18775996)
  14. University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing. Perceptions of Restraint use Questionnaire (PRUQ), 2010. [Internet] Available at http://www.nursing.up