Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

ONE-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF HIP FRACTURE PATIENTS AGED MORE THAN 80 YEARS AND POSTOPERATIVELY MONITORED IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT

POSTOPERATİF YOĞUN BAKIM ÜNİTESİNDE TAKİP EDİLEN 80 YAŞ ÜSTÜ KALÇA KIRIKLI HASTALARINBİR YILLIK RETROSPEKTİF DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
81–86
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, we have decided to form a new research protocol for evaluating patient satisfaction and causes of delay to the surgery.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: As in all the world, expected life time has extended in our country as well which increases yearly operated elderly patient rate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Surgical intervention for hip fracture is one of the most common operations among them Materials and Method: This study was done between 2014 and 2015 at Karabük Education and Research Hospital ICU.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, we have decided to form a new research protocol for evaluating patient satisfaction and causes of delay to the surgery.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: As in all the world, expected life time has extended in our country as well which increases yearly operated elderly patient rate. Surgical intervention for hip fracture is one of the most common operations among them Materials and Method: This study was done between 2014 and 2015 at Karabük Education and Research Hospital ICU. Who were older than age of 80, operated for hip surgery and monitorized at ICU postoperatively included to study. Results: The mean age of our patients was 84.65±3.36 years, and 50 of them were female (69.44%). 40 patients showed trochanteric femur fracture and 32 showed femoral neck fracture. Proximal femoral nail was implanted in 38 patients and partial hip prosthesis in 34. Regional anesthesia was administered to 57 patients and general anesthesia to 15. The hospital mortality rate was 16.6%.When we grouped the patients as surviving (60) or died (12), we found that the time before surgery was significantly longer for the died patients than for the surviving ones. The need for MV, duration of MV, and the need for inotropic agents were higher in died patients. The duration of ICU follow-up and hospital stay were longer for died patients. Other parameters showed no significant differences. Conclusion: In our study, mental status of our patients and post-discharge conditions could not be evaluated. Not describing the cause of delay to the surgery and not recording patient satisfaction was other limitations. Therefore, we have decided to form a new research protocol for evaluating patient satisfaction and causes of delay to the surgery.

Özet

Giriş: Tüm dünyada olduğu gibi ülkemizde de beklenen yaşam süresinin uzaması yıllık opere edilen yaşlı hasta yüzdesini artırmaktadır. Bu operasyonlar arasında en sık yapılanlardan biri kalça kırıklarına bağlı cerrahi girişimlerdir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu araştırma, 2014-2015 yılları arasında Karabük Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde yapılmıştır. Çalışmamıza, 80 yaş üzerinde, kalça kırığı nedeniyle operasyon geçirmiş olan ve postoperatif Yoğun Bakım Ünitesinde takibi yapılan hastalar alındı.Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 84.65±3.36 yıl idi ve bunların 50 si kadındı. 40 hastada trokanterik femur kırığı ve 32 hastada femur boyun kırığı vardı. Proksimal femur çivisi 38 ve parsiyel kalça protezi 34 hastaya uygulandı. 57 hastaya rejyonel anestezi 15 hastaya genel anestezi verildi. Hastane mortalitesi %16.6 idi. Hastalar yaşayan (60) ve ölenler (12) olarak gruplandırıldığında; ameliyat öncesi sure ölenlerde yaşayanlara göre uzundu. Mekanik ventilatör ihtiyacı ve mekanik ventilatör süresi ve inotrop ihtiyacı ölen hastalarda yüksekti. Yoğun bakım ünitesi ve hastanede yatış süreleri de ölen hastalarda uzundu. Diğer parametrelerde anlamlı bir fark yoktu.Sonuç: Çalışmamızda hastalarımızın mental değerlendirmeleri ve taburcu edildikten sonraki değerlendirmeleri yapılamamıştır. Operasyon gecikme nedenlerinin tanımlanmamış ve hastamemnuniyetinin kaydedilmemiş olması diğer bir kısıtlılıklarındandır. Bunedenle operasyon gecikmenedenlerini ve hasta memnuniyetini değerlendirmek için yeni bir araştırmaprotokolü oluşurmaya karar verdik

🔖

Cite This Article

DAŞAR, U. (2022). ONE-YEAR RETROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF HIP FRACTURE PATIENTS AGED MORE THAN 80 YEARS AND POSTOPERATIVELY MONITORED IN THE INTENSIVE CARE UNIT. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 81–86. https://ajindex.com/articles/623669

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Kim BH, Lee S, Yoo B, et al. Risk factors associated with outcomes of hip fracture surgery in elderly patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2015;68(6):561-7. (PMID:26634079)
  2. Çetinkaya E, Yavuz U, Lapcin O, et al. Assessment of peroperative parameters affecting mortality in geriatric hip fractures. JAREM 2016;6:183-7. (in Turkish)
  3. González-Zabaleta J, Pita-Fernandez S, SeoanePillado T, López-Calviño B, Gonzalez-Zabaleta JL. Comorbidity as a predictor of mortality and mobility after hip fracture. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016;16(5):561- 9. (PMID:25981487)
  4. Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Klocke NF, Callaghan JJ, Marsh JL. A risk calculator for short-term morbidity and mortality after hip fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma 2014;28(2):63-9. (PMID:23872716)
  5. Belmont PJ Jr., Garcia EJ, Romano D, Bader JO, Nelson KJ, Schoenfeld AJ. Risk factors for complications and in-hospital mortality following hip fractures: a study using the National Trauma Data Bank. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2014;134(5):597-604. (PMID:24570142)
  6. Kesmezacar H, Ayhan E, Unlu MC, Seker A, Karaca S. Predictors of mortality in elderly patients with an intertrochanteric or a femoral neck fracture. J Trauma 2010;68(1):153-8. (PMID:19797990)
  7. Koç M, Saçan Ö, Gamlı M, et al. Retrospective Evaluation of Anaesthesia Techniques for Hip Replacement Operations. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim 2014;42(3):133-9. (PMID:27366407)
  8. Liu Y, Peng M, Lin L, Liu X, Qin Y, Hou X. Relationship between American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade and 1-year mortality in nonagenarians undergoing hip fracture surgery. Osteoporos Int 2015;26(3):1029-33. (PMID:25300530)
  9. Kannegaard PN, van der Mark S, Eiken P, Abrahamsen B. Excess mortality in men compared with women following a hip fracture. National analysis of comedications, comorbidity and survival. Age Ageing 2010;39(2):203-9. (PMID:20075035)
  10. Dailiana Z, Papakostidou I, Varitimidis S, Michalitsis S, Veloni A, Malizos K. Surgical treatment of hip fractures: factors influencing mortality. Hippokratia 2013;17(3):252-7. (PMID:24470737)
  11. Daugaard CL, Jørgensen HL, Riis T, Lauritzen JB, Duus BR, van der Mark S. Is mortality after hip fracture associated with surgical delay or admission during weekends and public holidays? A retrospective study of 38,020 patients. Acta Orthop 2012;83(6):609-13. (PMID:23140106)
  12. Kilci O, Un C, Sacan O, et al. Postoperative mortality after hip fracture surgery: a 3 years follow up. PLoS One 2016;11(10):e0162097. (PM