SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

AETIOLOGY, OUTCOMES AND PROGNOSIS OF PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY PERFORMED ON PATIENTS AGED ABOVE 65 YEARS

65 YAŞ ÜZERİNDEKİ HASTALARDA UYGULANAN PENETRAN KERATOPLASTİNİN ETYOLOJİSİ, SONUÇLARI VE PROGNOZU

Sadullah KELEŞ
Osman ÖNDAŞ
Erdinç BOZKURT
Pages
56–65
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The data were statistically analyzed using paired-t test.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: The objective of this study is to evaluate indications, outcomes and prognosis in geriatric patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).Materials and Method: 84 of 297 patients, who underwent PKP between January 2013-August 2016, were retrospectively analyzed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Age, gender, time between the onset of complaints and keratoplasty, duration of follow-up, other intraoperative-postoperative surgical procedures, complications, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The data were statistically analyzed using paired-t test.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of this study is to evaluate indications, outcomes and prognosis in geriatric patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PKP).Materials and Method: 84 of 297 patients, who underwent PKP between January 2013-August 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. Age, gender, time between the onset of complaints and keratoplasty, duration of follow-up, other intraoperative-postoperative surgical procedures, complications, intraocular pressure (IOP), visual acuity were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed using paired-t test. P

Özet

Giriş: Penetran keratoplasti uygulanan geriatrik yaş grubundaki olgularda endikasyonların, sonuçların ve prognozun değerlendirilmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Ocak 2013-Ağustos 2016 tarihleri arasında penetran keratoplasti(PKP) uygulanan 297 hastadan 84’ünün dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Yaş, cinsiyet, şikayetler ile keratoplasti arasındaki süre, takip süresi, intraoperatif, postoperatif diğer cerrahi uygulamalar, komplikasyonlar, göz içi basıncı (GİB) ve görme keskinliği kaydedildi. İstatistiksel analizlerde paired-t testi kullanıldı. P

🔖

Cite This Article

KELEŞ, S., ÖNDAŞ, O., BOZKURT, E. (2022). AETIOLOGY, OUTCOMES AND PROGNOSIS OF PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY PERFORMED ON PATIENTS AGED ABOVE 65 YEARS. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 56–65. https://ajindex.com/articles/623645

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kilingworth DW, Stern GA, Driebe WT, Knapp A, Dragon DM. Results of therapeutic penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1993;100:534-41. (PMID:8479712)
  2. Ple-Plakon PA, Shtein RM. Trends in corneal transplantation: indications and techniques. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2014;25:300-5. (PMID:27330270)
  3. Cursiefen C, Kunchle M, Naumann GO. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty: Histopathology of 1,250 buttons. Cornea 1998;17:468- 70. (PMID:9756439)
  4. Duman F, Kosker M, Suri K, Reddy JC, Ma JF et al. Indications and outcomes of corneal transplantation in geriatric patients. Am J Ophthalmol 2013 Sep;156(3):600-7. (PMID:23769195)
  5. I Rahman, F Carley, C Hillarby, A Brahma, A B Tullo. Penetrating keratoplasty: indications, outcomes, and complications. Eye 2009;23:1288–94. (PMID:18949010)
  6. Y. Oie and K. Nishida. Triple procedure: cataract extraction, intraocular lens implantation, and corneal graft. Current Opinion in Ophthalmology 2017;28:63- 6. (PMID:27820748)
  7. S. Yang, B. Wang, Y. Zhang et al. Evaluation of an interlaced triple procedure: penetrating keratoplasty, extracapsular cataract extraction, and nonopen-sky intraocular lens implantation. Medicine 2017;96:7656. (PMID:28858085)
  8. Pahor D, Gracner B, Falez M, Gracner T. Changing indications for penetrating keratoplasty over a 20- year period, 1985-2004. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2007;224(2):110-4. (PMID:17309006)
  9. Dorrepaal SJ, Cao KY, Slomovic AR. Indications for penetrating keratoplasty in a tertiary referral centre in Canada, 1996-2004. Can J Ophthalmol 2007;42(2):244- 50. (PMID:17392847)
  10. Maeno A, Naor J, Lee HM, Hunter WS, Rootman DS. Three decades of corneal transplantation: Indications and patient characteristics. Cornea 2000;19:7-11. (PMID:10632000)
  11. Boimer C, Lee K, Sharpen L, Mashour RS, Slomovic AR. Evolving surgical techniques of and indications for corneal transplantation in Ontario from 2000 to 2009. Can J Ophthalmol 2011;46(4):360-6. (PMID:21816258)
  12. Dobbins KRB, Price FW, Whitson WE. Trends in the indications for penetrating keratoplasty in the Midwestern United States. Cornea 2000;19:813-6. (PMID:11095055)
  13. Altay Y, Burcu A, Aksoy G, Ozdemir ES, Ornek F. Changing indications and techniques for corneal transplantations at a tertiary referral center in Turkey, from 1995 to 2014. Clin opphthalmol 2016;10:1007-13. (PMID:27330270)
  14. Takashi Ono, Sosuke Ishiyama, Takeshi Hayashidera, Yosai Mori, Ryohei Nejima et al. Twelve-year followup of penetrating k