SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE SOCIAL INCLUSION SCALE

SOSYAL DAHİL OLMA ÖLÇEĞİNİN TÜRKÇE GEÇERLİK VE GÜVENİRLİK ÇALIŞMASI

Ayşegül ILGAZ
Sebahat GÖZÜM
Ayşe AKGÖZ
Pages
150–162
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The factor loadings of 18items of SIS loading on three factors varied between 0.40 and 0.79, accounting for 55.14% ofthe variance.Conclusion: SIS was found to be a reliable and valid tool for defining social inclusion levelsin the older persons aged ≥65 years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: This study aimed to adapt the Social Inclusion Scale (SIS) to a Turkishpopulation and test its reliability and validity.Materials and Method: In total, 230 older persons aged ≥65 years participated inmethodological research conducted in Antalya, Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To determine the reliability of the scale,internal consistency and item analyses were used.Results: Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.894, indicating high reliability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The factor loadings of 18items of SIS loading on three factors varied between 0.40 and 0.79, accounting for 55.14% ofthe variance.Conclusion: SIS was found to be a reliable and valid tool for defining social inclusion levelsin the older persons aged ≥65 years.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to adapt the Social Inclusion Scale (SIS) to a Turkishpopulation and test its reliability and validity.Materials and Method: In total, 230 older persons aged ≥65 years participated inmethodological research conducted in Antalya, Turkey. In the validity section, factorialconstruct and content validity analyses were used. To determine the reliability of the scale,internal consistency and item analyses were used.Results: Cronbach’s alpha of the scale was 0.894, indicating high reliability. The item-totalcorrelations ranged 0.28–0.70. The content validity index was 0.97. The factor loadings of 18items of SIS loading on three factors varied between 0.40 and 0.79, accounting for 55.14% ofthe variance.Conclusion: SIS was found to be a reliable and valid tool for defining social inclusion levelsin the older persons aged ≥65 years.

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmada, sosyal dahil olma ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması ve geçerlik güvenilirliğinin test edilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Antalya’da yürütülen bu metodolojik araştırmaya 65 yaş ve üzeri toplam 230 yaşlı birey katılmıştır. Geçerlik bölümünde faktör yapı ve içerik geçerliliği kullanılmıştır. Sosyal dahil olma ölçeğinin güvenilirliğini belirlemek için içtutarlılık ve madde analizi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: Ölçeğin Cronbach alfa değeri 0.894 bulunmuştur. Ölçek yüksek güvenilirlik göstermektedir. Madde toplam korelasyonu ise 0.28-0.70 arasında bulunmuştur. Kapsam geçerlik indeksi .97’dir. Üç faktöre yüklenen sosyal dahil olma ölçeğinin 18 maddelik faktör yükleri.40 ile.79 arasında değişmektedir ve varyansın %55.14’ünü açıklamaktadır. Sonuç: Sosyal dahil olma ölçeği, yaşlılarda sosyal dahil olma düzeyini tanımlamak için güvenilir ve geçerli bir araç olarak bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ILGAZ, A., GÖZÜM, S., AKGÖZ, A. (2022). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE TURKISH VERSION OF THE SOCIAL INCLUSION SCALE. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 150–162. https://ajindex.com/articles/623621

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. European Commission. Joint report on social inclusion. 2004. [Internet] Available from: http:// ec.europa.eu/employment_social/social_inclusion/ docs/final_joint_inclusion_report_2003_en.pdf. Accessed:1.8.2016
  2. Levitas R, Pantazis C, Fahmy E, Gordon D, Lloyd E, Patsios D. The multi-dimensional analysis of social exclusion. 2007. [Internet] Available from: http://dera. ioe.ac.uk/6853/1/multidimensional.pdf. Accessed: 2.7.2017
  3. Barnes M, Blom A, Cox K, Lessof C. The social exclusion of older people: evidence from the first wave of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA), final report. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. 2006. [Internet] Available from: https://www.ifs.org.uk/docs/ odpm_social_exclusion.pdf. Accessed: 3.6.2016
  4. Le Boutillier C, Croucher A. Social inclusion and mental health. Br J OccupTher 2010;73(3):136-39. (PMID:20592591)
  5. Alma MA, Van der Mei SF, Groothoff JW, Suurmeijer TP. Determinants of social participation of visually impaired older adults. Qual Life Res 2012;21(1):87-97. (PMID:21633880)
  6. Wilson C, Secker J. Validation of the Social Inclusion Scale with students. Social Inclusion 2015;3(4):52-62
  7. Dwyer P, Hardill I. Promoting social inclusion? The impact of village services on the lives of older people living in rural England. Ageing Soc 2011;31(2):243-64
  8. International Federation on Ageing. Social inclusion for an ageing population. 2010. [Internet] Available from: https://www.ifa-fiv.org/wp-content/ uploads/2012/11/SOM-Country-Report-Final.pdf. Accessed:8.8.2016
  9. Secker J, Hacking S, Kent L, Shenton J, Spandler H. Development of a measure of social inclusion for arts and mental health project participants. J Ment Health 2009;18(1):65-72
  10. Margrove KL, Heydinrych K, Secker J. Waiting list-controlled evaluation of a participatory arts course for people experiencing mental health problems. Perspect Public Health 2013;133(1):28-35. (PMID:23034832)
  11. Fatma G, Küçük E, Osman O. Comparisons of social support perceptions of the elderly living in nursing homes and at home. Cumhuriyet Nursing Journal 2015;4(2):47-53
  12. Ülgen SY. Examining the factors affecting social participation in the elderly living at home.Pamukkale University Health Sciences Institute 2012. [Internet] Available from: http://acikerisim.pau.edu.tr/xmlui/ handle/11499/384. Accessed: 8.7.2017
  13. Grove SK, Burns N, Gray J. The practice of nursing research: appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. 7th edition, Elsevier, Sa