Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMOTIONAL STATE AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF FAMILY CAREGIVERS OF STROKE PATIENTS AND PATIENT FACTORS

Pages
374–383
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was a statistically significant relationship between the quality of life of caregivers and the MRS, motor FIM and FIM-total scores of patients (p < 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the emotional state and quality of life of family caregivers of stroke patients and to investigate the relationship between patient factors and these characteristics of caregivers.MaterialsandMethod:Ninety-sevenpatientswithhemiplegiaafteracerebrovascular event and their caregivers were included in this cross-sectional study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Their quality of life was evaluated with Short Form-36.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was a statistically significant relationship between the quality of life of caregivers and the MRS, motor FIM and FIM-total scores of patients (p < 0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to evaluate the emotional state and quality of life of family caregivers of stroke patients and to investigate the relationship between patient factors and these characteristics of caregivers.MaterialsandMethod:Ninety-sevenpatientswithhemiplegiaafteracerebrovascular event and their caregivers were included in this cross-sectional study. The emotional state of the caregivers was evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Their quality of life was evaluated with Short Form-36. Functional Independence Measurement (FIM) and modified-Rankin Score (MRS) were used for functional status of the patients, HADS was used for their emotional state and Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale (SS-QOL) was used for their quality of life.Results: Mean HADS-Anxiety score was 9.0 ± 3.7 and mean HADS-Depression score was 8.3 ± 3.7 in caregivers. Mean HADS-Anxiety score was 10.1 ± 3.4 and mean HADS-D score was 8.7 ± 3.6 in patients. The rates of anxiety disorder and depression in caregivers were 39.2% and 55.7%, respectively. The rates of anxiety disorder and depression in stroke patients were 40.2% and 50.5%, respectively. A positive correlation was found between HADS scores of caregivers and patients (p < 0.05). There was a significant negative correlation between the HADS scores of caregivers and SS-QOL scores of patients (p < 0.05). There was a statistically significant relationship between the quality of life of caregivers and the MRS, motor FIM and FIM-total scores of patients (p < 0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

PAKER, N., ÖZDEMİR, Y. S. (2022). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EMOTIONAL STATE AND QUALITY OF LIFE OF FAMILY CAREGIVERS OF STROKE PATIENTS AND PATIENT FACTORS. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 374–383. https://ajindex.com/articles/623595

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Zarit S, Reever K, Bach–Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: Correlates of feelings of burden. Gerontologist 1980;20(6):649-55. (PMID:7203086)
  2. Rigby H, Gubits G, Philips S. A systematic review of caregiver burden following stroke. Int J Stroke 2009;4(4):285-92. (PMID:19689757)
  3. Jaracz K, Grabowska-Fudala B, Kozubski W. Caregiver burden after stroke: towards a structural model. Neurol Neurochir Pol 2012;46(3):224-32. (PMID:22773508)
  4. Denno M, Gillard P, Graham G, et al. Anxiety and depression associated with caregiver burden in caregivers of stroke survivors with spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94(9):1731-6. (PMID:23548544)
  5. Godwin K, Ostwald S, Cron S, Wasserman J. Longterm health related quality of life of survivors of stroke and their spousal caregivers. J Neurosci Nurs 2013;45(3):147-54. (PMID:23558977)
  6. Granger C, Hamilton B, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Frances SS. Advances in functional assessment in medical rehabilitation. Top Geriatr Rehabil 1986;1:59-74
  7. Küçükdeveci A, Yavuzer G, Elhan A, Sonel B, Tennant BA. Adaptation of the functional independence measure for use in Turkey. Clin Rehabil 2000;15(3):311- 19. (PMID:11386402)
  8. Mahmoodi M, Safari A, Vossoughi M, et al. Stroke specific quality of life questionnaire: Test of reliability and validity of the Persian version. Iran J Neurol 2015;14(2):94-100. (PMID:26056554)
  9. Lahmek P, Berlin I, Michel L, et al. Determinants of improvement in quality of life of alcohol-dependent patients during an inpatient withdrawal programme. Int J Med Sci 2009;6(4):160-67. (PMID:19461935)
  10. Pinar R. Reliability and construct validity of the SF-36 in Turkish cancer patients. Qual Life Res 2005;14(1):259- 64. (PMID:15789959)
  11. Zigmond A, Snaith R. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67(6):361- 70. (PMID:6880820)
  12. Paker N, Bugdayci D, Midik M, Celik B, Kesiktas N. Reliability of the Turkish version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in the people with traumatic spinal cord injury. NeuroRehabilitation 2013;33(2):337-41. (PMID:23949046)
  13. Bjelland I, Dahl A, Haug T, Neckelmann D. The validity of the hospital anxiety and depression scale: An updated literature review. J Psychosomat Res 2002;52(2):69-77. (PMID:11832252)
  14. Balhara Y, Verma R, Sharma S, Mathur S. A study of predictors of anxiety and depression among stroke patient–caregivers. J Mid-Life Health 2012;3(1):31-35. (PMID: 22923977
  15. Epstein-Lubow G, Beevers C, Bisho