SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Geriatri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

THE EFFECTS OF 1.5 TESLA CONTRAST-ENHANCED TEMPORAL BONE MRI ON THE AUDITORY FUNCTIONS AND COMPLAINTS OF GERIATRIC PATIENTS WITH TINNITUS

Nesibe Gül YÜKSEL ASLIER
Sevim YILDIZ
Özlem SAATÇI
Pages
230–240
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The threshold shifts were statistically higher in patients aged ≥65 than the ones aged

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Temporary hearing threshold shift might develop after noise exposure due to magnetic resonance imaging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We aimed to investigate the effects of acoustic noise during 1.5 Tesla temporal bone MRI on audiometric tests and disturbance self-reports in patients with tinnitus.Materials and Method: Sixty-three symptomatic ears of 55 patients with persistent tinnitus were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The threshold shifts were statistically higher in patients aged ≥65 than the ones aged
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Temporary hearing threshold shift might develop after noise exposure due to magnetic resonance imaging. We aimed to investigate the effects of acoustic noise during 1.5 Tesla temporal bone MRI on audiometric tests and disturbance self-reports in patients with tinnitus.Materials and Method: Sixty-three symptomatic ears of 55 patients with persistent tinnitus were included in this study. Sound level recordings of imaging room were made with dosimeter. Two age groups ( 65 years) were created. Hearing thresholds were measured before, 24 hours after and 1 month after performing magnetic resonance imaging. Visual analogue scale, tinnitus handicap inventory and the Beck depression inventory were applied to all patients before and 24 hours after the imaging.Results: The mean intensity of acoustic noise during imaging was recorded as 99.3±3.4 dBA (109.9±4.1 dB). The threshold shifts were statistically higher in patients aged ≥65 than the ones aged

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLIER, N. G. Y., YILDIZ, S., SAATÇI, Ö. (2022). THE EFFECTS OF 1.5 TESLA CONTRAST-ENHANCED TEMPORAL BONE MRI ON THE AUDITORY FUNCTIONS AND COMPLAINTS OF GERIATRIC PATIENTS WITH TINNITUS. Türk Geriatri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 230–240. https://ajindex.com/articles/623583

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Annesley-Williams DJ, Laitt D, Jenkins JP, Ramsden RT, Gillespie JE. MRI in the investigation of sensorineural hearing loss: is contrast enhancement still necessary? J Laryngol Otol 2001;115(1):14-21. (PMID:11233615
  2. Revadi G, Rahmat O, Raman R, Norlisah R, Ng KH. Hearing loss after noise exposure. Auris Nasus Larynx 2011;38(4):519-22. (PMID:21236610
  3. Brummett RE, Talbot JM, Charuhas P. Potential hearing loss resulting from MR imaging. Radiology 1988;169(2):539-40. (PMID:3175004
  4. McJury M, Blug A, Joerger C, Condon B, Wyper D. Short communication: acoustic noise levels during magnetic resonance imaging scanning at 1.5 T. Br J Radiol 1994;67(796):413-5. (PMID:8173889
  5. Jin C, Li H, Li X, Wang M, Liu C, Guo J, Yang J. Temporary hearing threshold shift in healthy volunteers with hearing protection caused by acoustic noise exposure during 3-T multisequence. MR Neuroimaging. Radiology 2018;286(2):602-8. (PMID:28813235
  6. Govindaraju R, Omar R, Rajagopalan R, Norlisah R, Kwan-Hoong N. Hearing loss after noise exposure. Auris Nasus Larynx 2011;38(4):519-22. (PMID:21236610
  7. Lim EY, Tang IP, Peyman M, Ramli N, Narayanan P, Rajagopalan R. 3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging noise in standard head and neck sequence does not cause temporary threshold shift in high frequency. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2015;272(11):3109-13. (PMID:25205300
  8. Figueiredo RR, Azevedo AA, Oliveira Pde M. Correlation analysis of the visual-analogue scale and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory in tinnitus patients. Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia. 2009;75(1):76-9. (PMID:19488564
  9. Aksoy S, Firat Y, Alpar R. The Tinnitus Handicap Inventory: a study of validity and reliability. The international tinnitus journal 2007;13(2):94-8. (PMID:18229787
  10. Newman CW, Jacobson GP, Spitzer JB. Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1996;122(2):143-8. (PMID:8630207
  11. Beck AT, Steer RA, Brown GK. BDI-II: Beck depression inventory manual. 2nd edition, Psychological Corporation, San Antonio, TX, USA 1996
  12. Quirk ME, Letendre AJ, Ciottone RA, Lingley JF. Anxiety in patients undergoing MR imaging. Radiology 1989;170(2):463-6. (PMID:2911670
  13. Kanal E, Shellock FG, Talagala L. Safety considerations in MR imaging. Radiology 1990;176(3):593-606. (PMID:2202008
  14. Shellock FG. Biological effects and safety aspects of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Q 1989;5(4):243-61. (PMID:2701284
  15. Amaro E, Jr, Williams SC, Shergill SS, et al