Journals / Türk Fertilite Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine treatments in hyper-prolactinemia

Hiperprolaktinemisi olan hastalarda bromokriptin ile abergolin tedavisinin karşılaştırılması

Pages
53–58
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In hyperprolactinemic women requiring treatment, cabergoline can be regarded as the treatment of choice because of effectiveness and tolerability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of cabergoline against bromocriptine in treatment of hyperprolactinemic patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and methods: 43 women with hyperprolactinemia and/or prolactinoma were treated either bromocriptine (5 mg/day) or cabergoline (0.5 mg/week) by a randomised way.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In hyperprolactinemic women requiring treatment, cabergoline can be regarded as the treatment of choice because of effectiveness and tolerability.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and tolerability of cabergoline against bromocriptine in treatment of hyperprolactinemic patients. Material and methods: 43 women with hyperprolactinemia and/or prolactinoma were treated either bromocriptine (5 mg/day) or cabergoline (0.5 mg/week) by a randomised way. Of 43 women 11 had pro lactinomas in bromocriptine group and 10 had prolactinomas in cabergoline group. Clinical and biochemical status was assessed before treatment and 6 months after medication. Results: Among the women who completed the study, normal menstrual cycles was achieved in 15 of 18 women treated with bromocriptine (83.3%) and 19 of 21 women treated with cabergoline (90.5%). Adverse effects were recorded in 66 percent of women taking bromocriptine and 40 percent of those taking cabergoline. Conclusion: In hyperprolactinemic women requiring treatment, cabergoline can be regarded as the treatment of choice because of effectiveness and tolerability.

Özet

Amaç: Hiperprolaktinernisi olan kadınlarda tedavinin etkinliği (tm kitlesi ve kan prolaktin düzeyi), mevcut semptomların düzelmesi ve yan etkiler açısından bromokriptin ile kabergolin tedavisinin karşılaştırılması amaçlanmıştır. Materyal ve method: Hiperprolaktinemi ile birlikte hipofiz adenoma olan veya olmayan toplam 43 hasta iki gruba randomize edilerek bir gruba bromokriptin diğer gruba kabergolin tedavisi verilmiştir. Tüm hastalarda kilnik tablo ve biokimyasal analizler tedavi öncesi ve altıncı ayın sonunda tekrar edilerek her iki tedavi yönteminin etkinliği ve yan etkiler karşılaştırılınıştır. Bulgular: Bromokriptin alan gruptaki hastaların %83.3'ünde, kabergolin grubundaki hastaların %90.5'inde tedavi sonrası normal menstruel siklus gözlenmiştir, ilk gruptaki hastaların % 66'sı, kabergolin grubundaki hastaların ise % 40 'ı yan etkilerden şikayetçi olmuştur. Sonuç: Kabergolin tedavisinde ilaca adaptasyonun daha kolay olması ve yüksek klinik etkinliği nedeniyle hiperprolaktinemi tedavisinde bromokriptin kadar etkin olarak kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YAZICI, G., ÖZ, U., TOK, E., ABAN, M., PATA, Ö., DİLEK, S. (2022). Comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine treatments in hyper-prolactinemia. Türk Fertilite Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 53–58. https://ajindex.com/articles/623407

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Biller MK, Luciano A. Guidelines for the diag¬nosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia J Reprod Med 1999; 44 (suppl): 1075-1084. 2.Crosignani PG, Ferrari C. Dopaminergic treat¬ments for hyperprolactinemic disorders Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1990; 4: 441-455. 3.Molitch ME. Medical treatment of prolactino-mas. Endocrinol Metab Clin North America 1999; 28: 143-169. 4. Ferrari C, Barbieri C, Caldara R. Long lasting prolactin lowering effect of cabergoline in hyperprolactinemic patients. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1996;63: 941-945. 5. Disalle E, Ornati G, Guidici DA comparison of the invivo and invitro duration of prolactin lowering effect in rats ofFCE21336, pergolide and bromocriptine. J Endocrinol Invest (suppl) 1984; 32: 7-11. 6. Webster J. Dopamin agonist therapy in hyperprolactinemia. J Reprod Med 1999; 44 (suppl): 1105-1110. 7. SperojfL, Glass RH, Kase NG Disorders of anterior pituitary In: SperoffL, Glass RH, Kase NG.Clinical gynecologic endocrinology and infertility 6. edition Lippincott Williams &wilkins 1999; 448-460. 8. Ciccarelli E, Giusti M, Miola C. Effectiveness and tolerability of long term treatment with cabergoline, a new long lasting ergoline derivative, in hyperprolactinemic patients J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989;69: 725-728. 9. Delgrange E, Maiter D, Donckier J. Effect of dopamine agonist cabergoline in patients with prolactinoma intolerant or resistance to bromocriptine. Eur J Endocrinol 1996; 134: 454-456. 10 Ferrari C, Paraccchi A, Mattei AM. Cabergoline in the long term therapy of hyperprolactinemic disorders. Acta Endocrinol 1992; 126: 489-494. 11. Webster J, Gabriella P, Polli A, Ferrari CI, is¬mail I, Scanlon MF. A comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in the treatment of hyperprolactinemic amenorrhea. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 904-909. 12. Niwa J, Minase T, Mori M. Immunohistochemical, electron microscopic and morphometric studies of human prolactinomas after short-term bromocriptine treatment. Surg Neurol 1987; 28: 339-344.13. 13. Molitch ME, Elton RL, Blackwell RE. Bromocriptine as primary therapy for prolactin secreting macroadenomas: Results of a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Mtab 1985; 60: 698-705. 14. Turner TH, Cookson JC, Was s JAH. Psychotic reactions during treatment of dopamine agonists BMJ 1984; 289:1101-1103. 15 Molitch ME Prolactinomas. In: Melmed S (ed) The Pituitary. Cambridge, MA, Blackwell-Science, 1995; 443-477.