Journals / Türk Fertilite Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Is biochemical pregnancy wastage in a provious IVF-et cycle a positive predictor of the subsequent cycles?

Üremeye yardımcı tedavi gören hastalarda biyokimyasal gebelik bir sonraki siklusta gebelik şansını artırır mı?

Pages
311–315
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although pregnancy rate was higher in group I compared to group II, it did not reach statistical significance (52.0% vs 46.8% respectively) Conclusion: It appears therefore that women with pre­vious biochemical pregnancy have higher chance of concei­ving following ICSI-ET than women with previous negative result.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of bi­ochemical pregnancy in anteceeding ART cycle to preceeding ART cycle Instutition: Private ART center Materials and Methods: Retrospective data of women undergoing controlled ovarian hyper stimulation and ICSI and embryo transfer during the period of 2001 and 2003.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Results: Implantation rate among women in Group I was significantly higher than women group II (24.5% vs 14.6%, respectively).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although pregnancy rate was higher in group I compared to group II, it did not reach statistical significance (52.0% vs 46.8% respectively) Conclusion: It appears therefore that women with pre­vious biochemical pregnancy have higher chance of concei­ving following ICSI-ET than women with previous negative result.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study is to assess the impact of bi­ochemical pregnancy in anteceeding ART cycle to preceeding ART cycle Instutition: Private ART center Materials and Methods: Retrospective data of women undergoing controlled ovarian hyper stimulation and ICSI and embryo transfer during the period of 2001 and 2003. Group I was defined as women having biochemical preg­nancies in previous ICSI cycles and where eas group II was defined women having negative results in previous ICSI cycles. Those individuals were compared for outcome in their next ICSI cycles. Results: Implantation rate among women in Group I was significantly higher than women group II (24.5% vs 14.6%, respectively). Although pregnancy rate was higher in group I compared to group II, it did not reach statistical significance (52.0% vs 46.8% respectively) Conclusion: It appears therefore that women with pre­vious biochemical pregnancy have higher chance of concei­ving following ICSI-ET than women with previous negative result.

Özet

Amaç:Bu çalışmanın amacı önceki denemesinde biyo­kimyasal gebelik yaşayan hastaların bir sonraki üremeye yardımcı teknikler (ÜYT) siklüsun prognozunu nasıl etkile­diğini araştırmaktır. Çalışmanın yapıldığı yer: Özel Üremeye Yardımcı Te­davi Merkezi Materyal ve Metodlar: 2001 ile 2003 yılları arasında kontollü ovaryen hiperstimülasyon (KOH), ICSI ve embri­yo transfer (ET) olan hastaların verileri retrospektif olarak tarandı. Bu dönem içersinde merkezimizde iki kez ardışık KOH ve 1CSI-ET olan hastalar saptandı. Bu hastalar içer­sinde ilk deneme sonucu olumsuz gelen (Grup I,- 169 hasta) ile ilk deneme sonucunda biyokimyasal gebelik olan hasta­lar (Grup II, 886 hasta) çalışma grupları olarak belirlendi. Bulgular: Grup 1 de bulunan hastaların implantasyon oranları Grup 2 'de bulunan hastaların implantasyon oran­larına göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede yüksek bu­lundu (% 24.5 vs %]4.6; p0.05). Sonuç: KOH ve ICSI-ET uygulanan ve bir önceki sik-lusunda biyokimyasal gebelik öyküsü olan hastaların prog-nozları daha önceki denemesinde gebeklik öyküsü olmayan hastalardan daha iyi gözükmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MESUT, A., ULUĞ, U., BAHÇECİ, M., ŞİŞMANOĞLU, A., TOSUN, S. (2022). Is biochemical pregnancy wastage in a provious IVF-et cycle a positive predictor of the subsequent cycles?. Türk Fertilite Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 311–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/623342

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Croucher CA, Lass A, M ar gara R, Winston RM. Predictive value of the results of a first in-Vitro fertilization cycle on the out­ come of subsequent cycles. Hum Reprod.; 13:403-8, 1998 2-Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; American So­ciety for Reproductive Medicine. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results gathered from the American So­ciety for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil SteriL;81:207-20, 2004 3-Lohstroh PN, Overstreet JW, Stewart DR, Nakajima ST,Cragun JR, Boyers SP, Lasley BL Secretion and excretion of hu­man chorionic gonadotropin during early pregnancy. Fertil Ste­ril.;83:1000-11, 2005 4-Poikkeus P, Hiilesmaa V, Tiitinen A: Serum HCG 12 days after embryo transfer in predicting pregnancy outcome: Hum Rep­rod.: 17:1901-5, 2002 5-Coulam CB, Roussev R. Chemical pregnancies: immunologic and ultrasonographic studies. Am J Reprod Immunol.:48:323-8, 2002 6-Condons G, Okaro E, KhalidA, Lu C, Van Huffel S, Timmerman D, Bourne T. A prospective evaluation of a single-visit strategy to manage pregnancies of unknown location. Hum Rep­rod.;20:1398-1403, 2005 7-Acosta AA, Oehninger S, Hammer J, Muasher SJ. Liang HM, Jones DL: Preclinical abortions: incidence and significance in the Norfolk in vitro fertilization program. Fertil Steril;;53:673-6,1990 8-Bates GW Jr, Ginsburg ES.; Early pregnancy loss in in vitro­ fertilization (IVF) is a positive predictor of subsequent IVF suc­cess. Fertil Steril.77; 337-41, 2002 9-Levy T, Goldman JA, Dicker D, Ashkenazi J, Feldberg D., Very early pregnancy wastage in in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET). J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf.;8:250-3, 1991