SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2

An Investıgatıon of Pre-Servıce Elementary School Teachers’ Knowledge Concernıng Quadrilaterals

Berna CANTÜRK GÜNHAN
Pages
137–154
Publication Date
2014-09-02
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the light of the research, it was suggested that emphasis be placed on making the pre-service teachers acquire the SMK and PCK while they were being trained and the atmosphere where they can share these knowledge be created.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The purpose of this study was to examine pre-service teachers’ subject matter knowledge (SMK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) about quadrilaterals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research was a case study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the light of the research, it was suggested that emphasis be placed on making the pre-service teachers acquire the SMK and PCK while they were being trained and the atmosphere where they can share these knowledge be created.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Pedagogical content knowledge · Subject matter knowledge · Pre-service teachers

Özet

Öz The purpose of this study was to examine pre-service teachers’ subject matter knowledge (SMK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) about quadrilaterals. The research was a case study. Within the scope of the research, five open-ended questions concerning quadrilaterals were asked to pre-service teachers, who are at five different geometrical thinking levels. According to the research, it was determined that of the pre-service teachers, the SMK of those whose geometrical thinking levels were low was poor and they confused the relationships among quadrilaterals. In the light of the research, it was suggested that emphasis be placed on making the pre-service teachers acquire the SMK and PCK while they were being trained and the atmosphere where they can share these knowledge be created.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNHAN, B. C. (2014). An Investıgatıon of Pre-Servıce Elementary School Teachers’ Knowledge Concernıng Quadrilaterals. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 2, 137–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/6227

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Akar, F. (2006). The efffectiveness of the discovery learning strategy on the mathematics achievement at the second step elementary. Unpublished master’s thesis, Çukurova University, The Institute of Social Sciences, Adana, Turkey. Altun, M. (2002). Maths teaching in 6th,, 7th and 8th classes, (2nd ed.). Bursa: Alfa Publishing. Başar,M., Ünal, M. &Yalçın, M. (2001). The reasons of the maths fear starting from the primary school. the congress of v. science and maths education. Retrieved August 10, 2007, from http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek-5/b_kitabi/PDF/Matematik/Bildiri/t212d.pdf
  2. Cooper, B. & Harries, T. (2002). Children’s responses to contrasting ‘realistic’ mathematics problems: Just how realistic are children ready to be mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 1- 23. De Bock, D., Van Dooren,W., Janssens, D. & Verschaffel, L. (2002). Improper use of linear reasoning: An in-depth study of the nature and the irresistibility of secondary school students’ errors. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 311–334. Depaepe, F., De Corte, E. & Verschaffel, L. (2010). Teachers’ approaches towards word problem solving: Elaborating or restricting the problem context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 152-160.
  3. Dursun, Ş. & Dede, Y. (2004). The factors affecting students’ success in mathematics: Mathematics teachers’ perspectives. Gazi University, The Journal of the Education Faculty, 24(2), 217–230. Erden, M. (1986). Primary school 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders’ behaviours when solving problems based on four operations. Hacettepe University, The Journal of the Education Faculty, 1, 105–113. Ersoy, Y. & Gür, H. (2004). Maths teaching based on problem setting and solving approach – 1: Teachers’ experiences and some problems. The board of mathematicians: The science corner. Retrieved July 17, 2007, from http://www.matder.org.tr/bilim/hgyepk.asp?ID=82
  4. Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-worlds connections in secondary mathematics classrooms. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11, 199-219.
  5. Greer, B. (1997). Modelling reality in mathematics classrooms: The case of word problems. Learning and Instruction, 7(4), 293–307. Gür, H. & Korkmaz, E. (2003). The identification of primary school 7th graders’ problem development skills. The board of mathematicians: The science corner. Retrieved August 15, 2007, from http://www.matder.org.tr/bilim/i7sopoabb.asp?ID=38
  6. Inoue, N. (2005). The realistic reasons behind unrealistic solutions: the role of interpretive ac