SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türkderm-Deri Hastalıkları ve Frengi Arşivi / 2013 / Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2

Evaluationofcutaneous manifestations according to the time in renal transplant recipients

Renaltransplantasyon hastalarında gözlenen deri bulgularının süreye göre değişiminin değerlendirilmesi

Nurhan SEYAHİ
Selma ALAGÖZ
Buhan ENGİN
Zekayi KUTLUBAAY
Ali Reza FENJANCHİ
Eneida KOTE
Leyla USMONOVA
Hasbi Ertuğrul AYDEMİR
Özden CALAY ÖZ
Pages
88–93
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results obtained from the patient groups, it was found that gender, length of post-transplant period, and use of immunosuppressant drugs do not influence the clinicamanifestations of patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background and Design: This study is conducted to determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of cutaneous manifestations in renal transplant patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Hospital records of 116 renal transplant patients were retrospectively investigated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained from the patient groups, it was found that gender, length of post-transplant period, and use of immunosuppressant drugs do not influence the clinicamanifestations of patients.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Background and Design: This study is conducted to determine the prevalence and clinical characteristics of cutaneous manifestations in renal transplant patients. Materials and Methods: Hospital records of 116 renal transplant patients were retrospectively investigated. The data obtained from patients who had 6 months follow-up period were evaluated. There were 68 (58.6%) males and 48 (41.4%) females aged between 10 and 68 years (mean=36.6 years). Detailed dermatologic examination was performed. The patients were grouped according to gender (male-female), posttransplant period (1-5 years, 5-10 years, >10 years) and the drugs used (cyclosporin, tacrolimus, other than these two immunosuppressant drugs). Results: The most common cutaneous manifestations were infectious. The dermatological findings were onychomycosis (13), tinea pedis (9), acneiform disorders (15), and warts (9). The clinical evaluation after 6 months has also demonstrated the same result. Among the evaluated patients, 7% showed premalignant or malignant manifestations on clinical examination. According to the results obtained from the patient groups, it was found that gender, length of post-transplant period, and use of immunosuppressant drugs do not influence the clinicamanifestations of patients. Conclusion: Dermatologic examinations and long-term follow-up should be performed in renal transplant patients. (Turkderm 2013; 47: 88-93)

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada renal transplant hastalarında görülen deri bulgularının sıklığı ve klinik özelliklerin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda renal transplantasyon yapılan 116 hastanın dosyaları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Altı aylık takip süreleri olan hastaların verileri değerlendirmeye alındı. Yaşları 10-68 arasında değişen (ortalama 36,62) 68 erkek (%58,6) ve 48 kadın (%41,4) hasta vardı. Hastaların detaylı dermatolojik muayeneleri yapıldı. Hastalar cinsiyet (erkek-kadın), transplantasyon süresi (1-5 yıl, 5-10 yıl ve 10 yıl üzeri), ve kullanılan ilaçlara (siklosporin, takrolimus, bu iki ilaç dışında immünosüpresan ilacı kullanan) göre gruplandırıldı. Bulgular: Transplant hastalarında en sık görülen deri bulguları infeksiyon hastalıklarıydı. Deri bulguları onikomikoz (13), tinea pedis (9), akneiform lezyon (15) ve verruka (9) şeklinde kaydedildi. Altı ay sonraki klinik değerlendirmede benzer sonuçlar elde edildi. Klinik muayenede hastalarda %7 premalin ve malin lezyon tespit edildi. Hasta gruplarına göre elde edilen sonuçlarda cinsiyet, transplantasyon süresi ve kullanılan ilaçların klinik bulguları etkilemediği belirlendi. Sonuç: Renal transplant hastalarında dermatolojik muayene ve takipler uzun süreli olmalıdır. (Türk­derm 2013; 47: 88-93)

🔖

Cite This Article

SEYAHİ, N., ALAGÖZ, S., ENGİN, B., KUTLUBAAY, Z., FENJANCHİ, A. R., KOTE, E., USMONOVA, L., AYDEMİR, H. E., ÖZ, Ö. C. (2022). Evaluationofcutaneous manifestations according to the time in renal transplant recipients. Türkderm-Deri Hastalıkları ve Frengi Arşivi, Cilt: 47 - Sayı: 2, 88–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/621894

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Sever MŞ: Türkiye’de böbrek transplantasyonu sorunları ve çözüm önerileriTürk Nefroloji Diyaliz ve Transplantasyon Dergisi 2008;17(Suppl 1):3-8. US Renal Data System. USRDS 2001
  2. Annual Report. Bethesda, MDNational Institute of Health, 2001.
  3. Bia M, Adey DB, Bloom RD, et al: KDOQI US commentary on the 2009 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipientsAm J Kidney Dis 2010;56:189-218. Maraki S: Venereol epidemiology of dermatophytoses in Crete, Greece between 2004 and 2010. G Ital Dermatol 2012;147:315-9.
  4. Wang YB, Han T, Zhao CX: Prevalence of human papillomavirus in the pubic hair follicles of healthy men and male patients with genital wartsZhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2010; 16:783-5.
  5. A Kwok, Sayeed M: Infections in renal transplant recipients managemenchallenging and preventation key. Nephrology Times 2008;1:2-3.
  6. Shuttleworth D, Philpot CM, Salaman JR: Cutaneous fungal infection following renal transplantation: a case control study. Br J Dermatol 1987;117:585-90.
  7. Ghaninejad H, Ehsani AH, Ghiasi M, et al: Benign and malignant skin lesions in renal transplant recipients. Indian J Dermatol 2009;54:247-50.
  8. Sandoval M, Ortiz M, Díaz C, Majerson D, Molgó M: Cutaneous manifestations in renal transplant recipients of Santiago, Chile. Transplant Proc 2009;41:3752-4.
  9. Prakash J, Singh S, Prashant GK, et al: Mucocutaneous lesions in transplant recipient in a tropical country. Transplant Proc 2004;36:2162-4.
  10. Vijayakumar R, Fernando E, Rajendran S, Jayakumar M, Muthusethupathi MA: Dermatological manifestations in renal transplant recipients. Transplant Proc 1998;30:3136. Abel EA: Cutaneous manifestations of immunosuppression in organ transplant recipients. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:167-79.
  11. Wolfson JS, Sober AJ, Rubin RH: Dermatologic manifestations of infections in immunocompromised patients. Medicine (Baltimore) 1985;64:115-33.
  12. Demirgüneş EF, Evans S, Yılmaz R, Şahin S, Yasavul Ü: Renal transplantasyon hastalarında gözlenen deri bulguları. Türkderm 2008;42:18-21.
  13. Dyall-Smith D, Trowell H, Dyall-Smith ML: Benign human papillomavirus infection in renal transplant recipients. Int J Dermatol 1991;30:785-9.