Journals / Türk Beyin Damar Hastalıkları Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2

RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE

SUBARAKNOİD KANAMANIN RADYOLOJİK OLARAK İNCELENMESİ

Pages
141–149
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Keywords: Subarachnoid haemorrhage, computed tomography, angiography, diagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage is one of the most elusive diagnoses in emergency medicine; it is a potentially lethal disease that is often considered and rarely found.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The current practice as determined by the American College of Emergency Physicians 1996 Clinical Policy on Headache is a noncontrast head computed tomography followed by diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude subarachnoid hemorrhage.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Keywords: Subarachnoid haemorrhage, computed tomography, angiography, diagnosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage is one of the most elusive diagnoses in emergency medicine; it is a potentially lethal disease that is often considered and rarely found. The current practice as determined by the American College of Emergency Physicians 1996 Clinical Policy on Headache is a noncontrast head computed tomography followed by diagnostic lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude subarachnoid hemorrhage. Whereas the guideline does not consider pretest probability of subarachnoid hemorrhage in determining which patients require LP after negative head computed tomography, patients’ technical aspects of performing a LP in patients with nonideal anatomy, and risks associated with LP must all be considered when choosing to proceed with invasive testing. The clinical challenges are to determine which patients with acute headache should undergo expensive and invasive diagnostic testing for this both rare and lethal condition and what, if any, low-risk characteristics of the history and physical examination can effectively rule out subarachnoid hemorrhage. As imaging technology such as computed tomography improves, the need for invasive testing with lumbar puncture may decrease. A decision rule to guide clinical practice in low-risk settings would be helpful and should be a focus of further research in this area. his article outlines the use of current testing modalities to provide an upto- date understanding of diagnostic testing for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Keywords: Subarachnoid haemorrhage, computed tomography, angiography, diagnosis.

Özet

Travmatik olmayan subaraknoid kanama, acil tıpta anlaşılması en zor teşhislerden biridir; sıklıkla düşünülen ve nadiren bulunan potansiyel olarak ölümcül bir hastalıktır. Subaraknoid kanamayı dışlamak için American College of Emergency Physicians (Amerikan Acil Doktorlar Koleji) tarafından belirlenen 1996 Baş Ağrısı Klinik Politikası güncel uygulaması: tanısal lomber ponksiyon (LP) ve kontrastsız bilgisayarlı beyin tomografisidir. Kılavuz, negatif bilgisayarlı beyin tomografiden sonra, hangi hastaların LP'ye ihtiyaç duyulduğunu belirlemede subaraknoid kanamanın ön test olasılığını dikkate almazken, ideal anatomiye sahip olmayan hastalarda LP kullanmanın teknik yönleri ve LP kullanımıyla ilgili risklerin tümü, invasif test seçiminde dikkate alınmalıdır. Klinik zorluklar, akut baş ağrısı olan hastaların hangilerinin, bu nadir ve ölümcül durumda, pahalı ve invaziv tanı testlerine tabi tutulması gerektiğini ve eğer varsa hasta geçmişi ve fizik incelemelerinin düşük risk özelliklerinden hangilerinin subaraknoid kanamayı etkili bir biçimde dışlayabileceğini belirlemektir. Bilgisayarlı tomografi gibi görüntüleme teknolojileri geliştikçe, lomber ponksiyon ile invaziv testlere duyulan ihtiyaç azalabilir. Düşük riskli ortamlarda klinik uygulamaya rehberlik etmek için bir karar kuralı yardımcı olacaktır ve bu alandaki daha ileri araştırmanın odağı olmalıdır. Bu makale, subaraknoid kanamanın tanısal testlerin güncel bir şekilde anlaşılmasını sağlamak için mevcut test yöntemlerinin kullanımını özetlemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAS, N., CAKMAKCI, E., SOYSAL, C. (2022). RADIOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF SUBARACHNOID HEMORRHAGE. Türk Beyin Damar Hastalıkları Dergisi, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 2, 141–149. https://ajindex.com/articles/620315

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Muizelaar JP, Vermeulen M, van Crevel H, et al. Outcome of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage in patients 66 years of age and older. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1988; 90(3): 203- 207
  2. Claassen J, Bernardini GL, Kreiter K, et al. Effect of cisternal and ventricular blood on risk of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: the Fisher scale revisited. Stroke 2001; 32(9): 2012-2020
  3. Qureshi AI, Suri MF, Yahia AM, et al. Risk factors for subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurosurgery 2001; 49(3): 607-613
  4. Edlow JA, Caplan LR. Avoiding pitfalls in the diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage. N Engl J Med 2000; 342(19): 29-36
  5. Westerlaan HE, van Dijk JM, Jansen-van der Weide MC, et al. Intracranial aneurysms in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage: CT angiography as a primary examination tool for diagnosis--systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 2011; 258(1): 134-145
  6. Locksley HB. Natural history of subarachnoid hemorrhage, intracranial aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations: based on 6368 cases in the cooperative study. J Neurosurg 1966; 25(2): 219-239
  7. Lefferts AM, Wagner A. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Acta Radiol 2000; 41(3): 204-210
  8. Cloft HJ, Joseph GJ, Dion JE. Risk of cerebral angiography in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, cerebral aneurysm, and arteriovenous malformation: a metaanalysis. Stroke 1999; 30(2): 317-320
  9. Waugh JR, Sacharias N. Arteriographic complications in the DSA era. Radiology. 1992; 182(1): 243-246
  10. Edlow JA, Wyer PC. Evidence-based emergency medicine/clinical question. How good is a negative cranial computed tomographic scan result in excluding subarachnoid hemorrhage? Ann Emerg Med 2000; 36(5): 507-516
  11. Sames TA, Storrow AB, Finkelstein JA, et al. Sensitivity of new-generation computed tomography in subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3(1): 16-20
  12. Sidman R, Connolly E, Lemke T. Subarachnoid hemorrhage diagnosis: lumbar puncture is still needed when the computed tomography scan is normal. Acad Emerg Med 1996; 3(9): 827-831. 13. van der Wee N, Rinkel GJ, Hasan D, et al. Detection of subarachnoid haemorrhage on early CT: is lumbar puncture still needed after a negative scan? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995; 58(3): 357-359
  13. Perry JJ, Spacek A, Forbes M, et al. Is the combination of negative computed tomography result and negative lumbar puncture result sufficient to rule out suba