Journals / Tüberküloz ve Toraks / 2001 / Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1

Bronkoskopi sedasyonunda midazolam ve lorazepamın karşılaştırılması

A comparative evaluation of lorazepam and midazolam in bronchoscopic premedication

Pages
129–136
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, midazolam was found a useful agent for bronchoscopy with satisfactory amnestic effectiveness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We designed a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of lorazepam and midazolam in bronchoscopic premedication.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sixty patients were randomly assigned to use nothing (Group 0) or lorazepam (Group 1) or midazolam (Group 2) for sedation before bronchoscopy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, midazolam was found a useful agent for bronchoscopy with satisfactory amnestic effectiveness.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We designed a prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of lorazepam and midazolam in bronchoscopic premedication. Sixty patients were randomly assigned to use nothing (Group 0) or lorazepam (Group 1) or midazolam (Group 2) for sedation before bronchoscopy. In lorazepam group FEV1, FVC reduced significantly (p 0.05). A questionnaire included three questions was administered to the patients, immediately after the procedure and the following day. First question assessed the patients perception of the procedure as easy or difficult. With significant statistically difference, at 24 hours, more patients in midazolam group described the procedure as easy than in those other groups (p 0.05). Patients recollection of procedure was asked in the third question and at 24 hours the recalling of the procedure was less precise in midazolam group, than those of other groups (p< 0.05). In conclusion, midazolam was found a useful agent for bronchoscopy with satisfactory amnestic effectiveness. It was observed that lorazepam reduced FEV1 and FVC, so it had to be used carefully when bronchoscopy performed on patients with COPD.

Özet

Bronkoskopi premedikasyonunda lorazepam ve midazolamın etkinliğini değerlendirmek amacıyla prospektif bir çalışma düzenledik. Altmış hastanın randomize olarak seçilen 20'sine, bronkoskopi öncesi sedasyon için ilaç verilmezken (Grup 0), 20'sine lorazepam (Grup 1), 20'sine midazolam (Grup 2) verildi. Lorazepam grubunda FEV1 ve FVC, anlamlı olarak düştü (p 0.05). Üç soru içeren bir anket hemen işlem sonrasında ve sonraki gün hastalara uygulandı. İlk soruda hastanın işlemi nasıl algıladığı (zor, kolay) araştırıldı. Midazolam grubundaki hastaların çoğu 24 saat sonra istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılıkla işlemi diğer gruplardaki hastalardan daha kolay olarak tanımlamışlardı (p 0.05). Üçüncü soruda hastanın işlemi hatırlayıp hatırlamadığı değerlendirildi ve 24 saat sonunda midazolam grubundaki hastaların işlemi diğer gruptakilerden daha az hatırladığı anlaşıldı (p< 0.05). Sonuçta midazolam amnestik etkinliğinin fazla olması nedeniyle bronkoskopi için uygun bulundu. Lorazepamın FEV1 ve FVC'yi düşürdüğü, dolayısıyla kronik obstrüktif akciğer hastalığı (KOAH) grubunda bronkoskopi yapılırken dikkatli olunması gerektiği belirtildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖNÜLLÜ, U., KARACAN, Ö., ÖZDEMİR, Ö., ARBAK, P., ERDEM, F. (2022). Bronkoskopi sedasyonunda midazolam ve lorazepamın karşılaştırılması. Tüberküloz ve Toraks, Cilt: 49 - Sayı: 1, 129–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/619383

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Prakash UBS, Stubbs SE. Optimal bronchoscopy. Journal of Brochology 1994; 1:44-62
  2. Rees PJ, Hay JG, Webb JR. Premedications for fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Thorax 1983; 38: 624-7
  3. San Pedro G, Herrmann D, Sifford M, et al. Preoperative medications for bronchoscopy (Abstract). Chest 1989; 96: 223
  4. Colt HG, Morris JF. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy without premedication: A retrospective study. Chest 1990; 98: 1327-30
  5. Credle WF, Smiddy JF, Elliot RC. Complications of fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Am Rev of Respir Dis 1974; 109: 67-72
  6. Gruber B. Deaths and complications associated with fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1976; 69: 747-51
  7. Zavala DC. Complications following fiberoptic bronchoscopy. The "good news" and the "bad news". Chest 1978; 73: 783-5
  8. Mehta JB, Stubbs R. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy without premedication. Chest 1991; 100: 1179-80
  9. Kvale PA. Is sedation necessary for flexible bronchoscopy? Pro sedation. Journal of Bronchology 1994; 1:246-9
  10. Reed AP. Preparation of the patient for awake flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 1992; 101:244-53
  11. Stanopoulos IT, Pickering R, Beamis JF, et al. Oximetric monitoring during routine, oxygen-supplemented flexible bronchoscopy: What role does it have? Journal of Bronchology 1995; 2: 5-11
  12. Forster A, Gardas JP, Suter PM, et at. Respiratory depression by midazolam and diazepam. Anesthesiology 1980; 53: 494-7
  13. Zsigmond EK, Shively JG, Flynn K. Diazepam and meperidine on arterial blood gases in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Pharmacol 1975; 15: 464-9
  14. Boralessa H, Senior DF, Whitwam JG. Cardiovascular response to intubation. Anaesthesia 1983; 38: 623-7
  15. Colt HG. Is sedation necessary for flexible bronchoscopy? Journal of Bronchology 1994; 1:250-3
  16. Maltais F, Laberge F, Laviolette M. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lorazepam as premedication for bronchoscopy. Chest 1996; 109; 1195-8.