Journals / Tüberküloz ve Toraks / 2013 / Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2

ağlık çalışanlarının anafilaksi hakkında bilgi düzeyi

Level of knowledge about anaphylaxis among health care providers

Pages
140–146
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Anaphylaxis was often diagnosed and managed inadequately, regardless of practice location, employment status and speciality in north-eastern Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: Level of knowledge about anaphylaxis was evaluated in health care providers by using a self-administered questionnaire.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: A total of 1172 participants responded to the survey, and previously half of them had met a case with anaphylaxis with a highest rate in primary and a lowest rate in tertiary care (p= 0.005).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Anaphylaxis was often diagnosed and managed inadequately, regardless of practice location, employment status and speciality in north-eastern Turkey.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: Level of knowledge about anaphylaxis was evaluated in health care providers by using a self-administered questionnaire. Materials and Methods: A total of 1172 participants responded to the survey, and previously half of them had met a case with anaphylaxis with a highest rate in primary and a lowest rate in tertiary care (p= 0.005). Results: 84.7% of participants answered the questions about the symptoms of anaphylaxis correctly. Although 62.6% of the group knew correctly anaphylaxis treatment steps, 44.7% of them agreed to administer epinephrine if they suspected of a subject with anaphylaxis. One third of the group indicated appropriate route of epinephrine administration. 85.2% of participants agreed to refer the patient to allergy clinic despite 33.7% of the group were unaware of where the nearest allergy clinic was. Only 20.3% of the respondents have heard about epinephrine auto-injector. Conclusion: Anaphylaxis was often diagnosed and managed inadequately, regardless of practice location, employment status and speciality in north-eastern Turkey.

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmada, sağlık çalışanlarının anafilaksi hakkında bilgi düzeyi kendilerinin doldurduğu anketler aracılığıyla değerlendirildi. Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmaya 1172 kişi katıldı. Çalışmaya katılanların en fazla birinci basamak ve en az üçüncü basamakta olmak üzere yarısı anafilaksiyle daha önceden karşılaşmıştı (p= 0.005). Bulgular: Katılımcıların %84.7’si anafilaksi semptomlarını doğru yanıtladı. Grubun %62.6’sı anafilaksi tedavi basamaklarını doğru bilirken, %44.7’si anafilaksiden şüphelendiklerinde epinefrin hakkındaki uygulamayı doğru buldu. Grubun üçte biri epinefrini doğru uygulama bilgisine sahipti. Çalışanların %85.2’si hastayı allerji kliniğine yönlendirmeyi önermesine rağmen, %33.7’si en yakın allerji kliniğinin nerede olduğunu bilmiyordu. Katılımcıların sadece %20.3’ü epinefrin oto-enjektörünü biliyordu. Sonuç: Anafilaksi, çalışılan yer, meslek ve uzmanlık alanından bağımsız olarak Türkiye’nin kuzeydoğu anadolu bölgesinde genelde yetersiz tanı konularak tedavi edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAÇÇIOĞLU, A., YILMAZEL, E. U. (2022). ağlık çalışanlarının anafilaksi hakkında bilgi düzeyi. Tüberküloz ve Toraks, Cilt: 61 - Sayı: 2, 140–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/618628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Lieberman P, Nicklas RA, Oppenheimer J, Kemp SF, Lang DM, Bernstein DI, et al. The diagnosis and management of anaphy- laxis practice parameter: 2010 update. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126: 477-80. 2.Orhan F, Canitez Y, Bakirtas A, Yilmaz O, Boz AB, Can D, et al. Anaphylaxis in Turkish children: a multi-centre, retrospective, case study. Clin Exp Allergy 2011; 41: 1767-76. 3.Krugman SD, Chiaramonte DR, Matsui EC. Diagnosis and management of food-induced anaphylaxis: a national survey of pediatricians. Pediatrics 2006;118; 554-60. 4.Kahveci R, Bostanci I, Dallar Y. The effect of an anaphylaxis guideline presentation on the knowledge level of residents. J Pak Med Assoc 2012; 62: 102-6. 5.Jacobsen RC, Toy S, Bonham AJ, Salomone JA, Ruthstrom J, Gratton M. Anaphylaxis knowledge among paramedics: results of a national survey. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012; 16: 527- 34. 6.Keskin O, Tuncer A. Anaphylaxis. Hacettepe Tıp Dergisi 2005; 36: 98-104. 7.Sin BA. Anaphylaxis. In: Candan I (ed). Medical Treatment. Ankara: ANTIP, 2003: 1261-71. 8.Grabenhenrich L, Hompes S, Gough H, Ruëff F, Scherer K, Pföhler C, et al. Implementation of anaphylaxis management guidelines: a register-based study. PLoS One 2012; 7: 35778. 9. Sin AB. Adrenalin autoinjector: properly used? Asthma Allergy Immunol 2009; 7: 1-2. 10.Arga M, Bakirtas A, Turktas I, Demirsoy MS. Do pediatricians and the pediatric residents know how to use adrenalin autoinjector? Asthma Allergy Immunol 2009; 7: 26-31.