Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2

Silicosis in Turkey: Is it an Endless Nightmare or is There Still Hope?

Pages
89–93
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, optimal healthcare andbetter living conditions for patients with silicosis should be ensured.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Silicosis is an ancient but still life‐threatening occupational lung disease because of its incurable nature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although its risks are known inmany occupational settings and effective control strategies are well established, new cases, even epidemics, continue to occur in differentsectors of Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, optimal healthcare andbetter living conditions for patients with silicosis should be ensured.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Silicosis is an ancient but still life‐threatening occupational lung disease because of its incurable nature. Although its risks are known inmany occupational settings and effective control strategies are well established, new cases, even epidemics, continue to occur in differentsectors of Turkey. Before taking action, defining the magnitude of the problem is essential. In this concise review, we aimed to presentthe current situation of silicosis in Turkey. According to the data available to date, silicosis continues to be a major health problem in dif-ferent sectors. Sandblasting seems to have the highest risk for the development of silicosis. Disease onset at early age and history of shortexposure duration may indicate intense silica exposure. After denim sandblasters, dental technicians seem to be the new and recentlyrecognized high-risk occupation group as per the increasing reports.Because of the lack of a definite treatment of silicosis, prevention of the disease should be the main target. Better occupational diseaseregistry systems would be useful to assess the magnitude of the problem. In addition to implementing the necessary regulations, a closeinspection of the workplaces for potential risks is essential. Other social and economic factors related with the occurrence of disease,such as unregistered employment rate and unlicensed and uninsured work, should also be considered. Finally, optimal healthcare andbetter living conditions for patients with silicosis should be ensured.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÜN, M., ERGAN, B. (2022). Silicosis in Turkey: Is it an Endless Nightmare or is There Still Hope?. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 2, 89–93. https://ajindex.com/articles/618126

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Cullinan P, Muñoz X, Suojalehto H, et al. Occupational lung diseases: from old and novel exposures to effective preventive strategies. Lancet Respir Med. 2017;5:445-55. [CrossRef] Artvinli F. The ethics of occupational health and safety in turkey: responsibility and consent to risk. Acta Bioeth. 2016;22:111-8. [CrossRef] Henneberger PK, Weissman DN. Old adversaries in new places. Occup Environ Med. 2018;75:1-2. [CrossRef] De Matteis S, Heederik D, Burdorf A, et al. Current and new challenges in occupational lung diseases. Eur Respir Rev 2017;26(146). [CrossRef] Martínez-González C. Changes in the Profile Of Diseases Caused By The Inhalation Of Silica. Arch Bronconeumol 2018;54:5-6. [CrossRef] Turkish Statistical Institute. Labour Force Statistics, November 2017. Available at: http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreHaberBulten- leri.do?id=27687. Last accessed on 12 March 2018.
  2. Akgun M, Araz O, Akkurt I, et al. An epidemic of silicosis among former denim sandblasters. Eur Respir J. 2008;32:1295- 303. [CrossRef] Social Security Institution. Statistical Yearbook (2007-2016). Available at: http://www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/sgk/tr/kurumsal/ istatistik/sgk_istatistik_yilliklari. Last accessed on 12 March 2018.
  3. Davoodi S, Haghighi KS, Kalhori SRN, et al. Occupational disease registries-characteristics and experiences. Acta Inform Med. 2017;25:136-40. [CrossRef] Altinöz H, Çelikkalkan C, Horasan GD, et al. Socio-demograph- ic and clinical characteristics of turkish workers with pneumo- coniosis. Cent Eur J Public Health 2016;2:231-3. [CrossRef] Alıcı NŞ, Çimrin A, Coşkun Beyan A. Pneumoconiosis in dif- ferent sectors and their differences in Turkey. Tuberk Toraks 2016;64(4):275-82. [CrossRef] Akgun M. Coal mine accidents. Turk Thorac J 2015;16:S1-S2. [CrossRef] Atalay F. The history of the coal mining industry and mining accidents in the world and turkey. Turk Thorac J 2015;16:S5- S8. [CrossRef] Saygun M, Tunçbilek A, Karabıyıloğlu G. The cases of pneu- moconiosis evaluated in SSK high health committee between 1994-1996. Tuberculosis Thorax 2002;50:358-68.
  4. Petsonk EL, Rose C, Cohen R. Coal mine dust lung disease. New lessons from old exposure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:1178-85. [CrossRef] Tor M, Özturk M, Altın R, Cimrin AH. Working conditions and pneumoconiosis in Turkish coal miners between 1985 and 2004: a report from Zonguldak coal basin, Turkey. Tuberk Tor- aks. 2010;58:252-60.
  5. Blackley DJ, Crum JB, Halldin CN, et al. Resurgence of pro- gressive massive fibrosi