Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2018 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3

Development of an Allergen-Exposure Avoidance Scale and Inhaler Use Scale for Patients with Asthma: A Reliability and Construct Validity Study

Pages
110–116
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

They can be used to measurefactors affecting the behavioral intentions toward individuals with asthma.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the allergen-exposure avoidance scale (AEAS) and inhaler use scale(IUS) in patients with asthma.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was performed as a methodological design.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study included 130 patients withasthma.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:They can be used to measurefactors affecting the behavioral intentions toward individuals with asthma.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the reliability of the allergen-exposure avoidance scale (AEAS) and inhaler use scale(IUS) in patients with asthma.MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was performed as a methodological design. The study included 130 patients withasthma. Each scale of allergen-exposure avoidance and inhaler use comprised 13 items. Cronbach’s alpha and total item correlationwere performed to calculate internal consistency of the scales, and the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin, Bartlett’s, and exploratory factor analysis testswere performed to assess construct validity.RESULTS: The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were 0.724 for IUS and 0.624 for AEAS. After exploratory factor analysis, the factors witheigenvalues >1.00 in the analysis (eigenvalues for IUS were 3.790, 1.793, and 1.789 and for AEAS were 2.990, 2.195, and 1.291) wereconsidered. In the results of the analysis, three factors emerged in parallel with the theoretical structure. These three factors explained52.087% of the total variance in IUS (29.151%, 13.790%, and 9.145%, respectively) and 53.960% of the total variance in AEAS(24.916%, 18.289%, and 10.754%, respectively).CONCLUSION: Inhaler use scale and AEAS were determined to be reliable and construct valid scales. They can be used to measurefactors affecting the behavioral intentions toward individuals with asthma.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞANLITÜRK, D., ALKAYA, S. A. (2022). Development of an Allergen-Exposure Avoidance Scale and Inhaler Use Scale for Patients with Asthma: A Reliability and Construct Validity Study. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 3, 110–116. https://ajindex.com/articles/618124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. To T, Stanojevic S, Moores G, et al. Global asthma prevalence in adults: Findings from the cross-sectional world health survey. BMC Public Health 2012;12:2-8. [CrossRef] 2. The Global Asthma Report. 2014. Available from: http://www. globalasthmareport.org/about.php. 3. İbrahim M, Verma R, Garcia-Contreras L. Inhalation drug delivery devices: Technology update. Medical Devices (Auckl) 2015;8:131-9. 4. Toumas-Shehata M, Price D, Basheti IA, Bosnic-Anticevich S. Exploring the role of quantitative feedback in inhaler technique education: a cluster-randomised, two-arm, parallelgroup, repeated-measures study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med 2014;24:14071. [CrossRef] 5. Valizadeh L, Zarei S, Zamanazadeh V, et al. The effects of triggers’ modifying on adolescent self-efficacy with asthma: A randomized controlled clinical trial. J Caring Sci 2014;3:121-9. 6. Damon SA, Tardif RR. Asthma education: different viewpoints elicited by qualitative and quantitative methods. J Asthma 2015;52:314-7. [CrossRef] 7. Karayağız GM, Başbakkal Z. The planned behavior theory and breastfeeding behavior (Planlı davranış teorisi ve emzirme davranışı). Turk Clin J Nurs Sci 2013;5:28-40. 8. Bassett-Gunter RL, Levy-Milne R, Naylor PJ, et al. A comparison of theory of planned behavior beliefs and healthy eating between couples without children and first-time parents. J Nutr Educ Behav 2015;47:216-24. [CrossRef] 9. Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 1991; 50:179-211. [CrossRef] 10. Lapkin S, Levett-Jones T, Gilligan C. Using the theory of planned behavior to examine health professional students’ behavioural intentions in relation to medication safety and collaborative practice. Nurse Educ Today 2015;35:935-40. [CrossRef] 11. Pooreh S, Hosseini-Nodeh Z. Impact of education based on theory of planned behavior: An Investigation into hypertensionpreventive self-care behaviors in Iranian girl adolescent. Iran J Public Health 2015;44:839-47. 12. Rashidian A, Russell I. General practitioners’ ıntentions and prescribing for asthma: Using the theory of planned behavior to explain guideline implementation. Int J Prev Med 2012;3:17- 28. 13. Coşkun S, Bebiş H. Psychometric evaluation of a Turkish version of the e-health literacy scale (e-heals) in adolescent. Gulhane Med J 2015;57:378-84. [CrossRef] 14. Global Initiative for Astma (GINA). Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. Updated 2010, Chapter 1. Definition and overview 2012;1-3