Journals / Turkish Thoracic Journal / 2021 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5

Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Reaction Type Scale Against COPD

Pages
386–392
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

RESULTS: According to the results of the EFA, the COPD Perception and Reaction Scale consists of 3 subdimensions and 23 items.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to develop a scale that could assess illness perception and reaction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study included 271 COPD patients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:RESULTS: According to the results of the EFA, the COPD Perception and Reaction Scale consists of 3 subdimensions and 23 items.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to develop a scale that could assess illness perception and reaction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study was conducted in patients who were admitted in the pulmonary disease departments of a public and a private hospital. The study included 271 COPD patients. The COPD Perception and Reaction Scale, consisting of 54 items, was prepared as a Likert-type 5-point rating scale. In the validity phase of the study, expert judgments were obtained for content validity, and explanatory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA and CFA) were then performed. The reliability of the scale in terms of internal consistency was tested with the Cronbach's alpha coefficient. RESULTS: According to the results of the EFA, the COPD Perception and Reaction Scale consists of 3 subdimensions and 23 items. Factors are termed behavioral reaction, emotional reaction, and spiritual reaction. According to the CFA, the goodness-of-fit indices obtained (χ2/df = (676.47/227) 2.98 and RMSEA = 0.056, NFI = 0.80, CFI = 0.96, NFI = 0.91, and AGFI = 0.85) suggest that the recommended model for the scale is acceptable. The Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.74; Cronbach's alpha values for the subdimensions were calculated as 0.87 for “emotional reaction,” 0.76 for “behavioral reaction,” and 0.79 for “spiritual reaction.” CONCLUSION: The 23-item form of the COPD Illness Perception and Reaction Scale was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable scale for determining the perception and the reaction toward illness in COPD patients in Turkey.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNEN, H., GÜRHAN, N., EROĞLU, S. A., ŞİRİN, B., KAYA, E., KÖKTÜRK, N., POLAT, Ü. (2022). Validity and Reliability of Turkish Version of Reaction Type Scale Against COPD. Turkish Thoracic Journal, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 5, 386–392. https://ajindex.com/articles/618099

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Global Burden of Disease Study 2013 Collaborators. Global burden of disease Study 2013 collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: asystematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet. 2015
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Quaderi SA, Hurst JR. The unmet global burden of COPD. Glob Health Epidemiol Genom. 2018
  3. e4. [CrossRef] 3. Türk toraks Derneği'nin GOLD 2017. Kronik Obstrüktif Akciğer Hastalığı (KOAH) Raporuna Bakışı. 4. Ekici A, Bulcun E, Karakoc T, Senturk E, Ekici M. Factors associated with quality of life in subjects with stable COPD. Respir Care. 2015
  4. [CrossRef] 5. Avşar G, Kaşıkçı MK. Living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative study. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2010
  5. Weldam SWM, Lammers JWJ, Heijmans MJWM., Schuurmans MJ. Perceived quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a cross-sectional study in primary care on the role of illness perceptions. BMC Fam Pract. 2014
  6. [CrossRef] 7. Aydın HT, Yıldız FT, Karagözoğlu Ş, Özden D. Hastaların bakış açısıyla kronik obstrüktif akciğer hastalığı ile yaşamak: fenomenolojik çalışma. İ.Ü.F.N. Hem. Derg. 2012
  7. Aras A, tel H. Kronik obstrüktif akciğer hastaliği olan hastalarda algilanan sosyal destek ve ilişkili faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Tur Toraks Der. 2009
  8. Doyle T, Palmer S, Johnson J, et al. Association of anxiety and depression with pulmonary-specific symptoms in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Psychiatry Med. 2013
  9. [CrossRef] 10. Dalal AA, Shah M, Lunacsek O, Hanania NA. Clinical and economic burden of depression/anxiety in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients within a managed care population. COPD. 2011
  10. [CrossRef] 11. Atlantis E, Fahey P, Cochrane B, Smith S. Bidirectional associations bet weenclinically relevant depression or anxiety and COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2013
  11. [CrossRef] 12. Anar C, Tatar D, Gediktaş E, Yıldırım Y, Halilçolar H. Uzun süreli oksijen tedavisi uygulanan KOAH’lı olgularda anksiyete depresyon sıklığı. İzmir Göğüs Hastanesi Derg. 2012
  12. Gürgün A, Ekren PK, Karapolat H, Erdinç E. Kronik Obstrüktif akciğer Hastalığında Ayaktan Uygulanan sekiz Haftalık Pulmoner rehabilitasyon programının etkisi. Turk Klin J Med Sci. 2013
  13. Akıncı AÇ, P