Journals / Turkish Studies - Social Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

In a Conceptual Debate on The Elimination and Possibility of Revocation in Non-CommercialSales Between Cash and Prepaid Sales

Pages
441–447
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, in terms of the legal debate, in this study, a proposal will be made to introduce the right ofwithdrawal in non-commercial sales between cash and preparations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the trade equation that constitutes the basis of marketing policies, businesses face the consumerin offering and making the goods and services they produce accepted.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When this situation is taken into consideration in a significant way, it makes today's trading systemsof developed economies consumer-centric.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, in terms of the legal debate, in this study, a proposal will be made to introduce the right ofwithdrawal in non-commercial sales between cash and preparations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the trade equation that constitutes the basis of marketing policies, businesses face the consumerin offering and making the goods and services they produce accepted. Therefore, the consumer is a veryimportant variable, especially in terms of acceptance. In addition, although goods are concrete and service isan abstract concept in this equation, shopping will become possible thanks to the decision-making, bargaining,preference and acceptance of the consumer as a thinking entity. In other words, in any shopping transaction ofa human consumer; knowingly or unknowingly feelings, thoughts and behaviors will be able to make animpact. When this situation is taken into consideration in a significant way, it makes today's trading systemsof developed economies consumer-centric. Therefore, many legal and administrative regulations are made forthe protection of the consumer within this system. As a matter of fact, it is the consumer who is weak in termsof protecting and guaranteeing their rights from these variables. In the Turkish Commercial Code, the Law onthe Protection of the Consumer, the right of withdrawal is regulated in detail in the service with defective goodsand consumer contracts. When the same law is analyzed from the consumer point of view, there is no doubtabout the validity of the withdrawal provisions brought in favor of the consumer. Based on these opinions, theaim of the study is; it is aimed at further developing the existing right and possibility of withdrawal in non commercial sales between cash and preparations. Its contribution to the field indicates the importance of thestudy. In addition, in terms of the legal debate, in this study, a proposal will be made to introduce the right ofwithdrawal in non-commercial sales between cash and preparations

🔖

Cite This Article

CAN, O., YÜCEL, R. (2022). In a Conceptual Debate on The Elimination and Possibility of Revocation in Non-CommercialSales Between Cash and Prepaid Sales. Turkish Studies - Social Sciences, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 441–447. https://ajindex.com/articles/618080

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ateş, D. (2007). Sözleşme özgürlüğü yönünden dürüstlük kuralları, Türkiye Barolar Birliği Dergisi, Yayın No:72, 72-93.
  2. Barutçu, S. (2011). Mobil viral pazarlama. Journal of Internet Applications and Management, 2(1), 5-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.5505/iuyd.2011.87587
  3. Baysal B. (2017).
  4. Sözleşmenin uyarlanması, BK m.138, Aşırı İfa Güçlüğü, (1. Baskı), Onikilevha Yayıncılık. Battal, A. (1998). TKHK yönünden tacirlerin tüketici sıfatı, Prof. Dr. Ali Bozer’e Armağan, Banka ve Ticaret Hukuku Araştırma Enstitüsü, 313-332.
  5. Buz, V. (2005). Medeni hukukta yenilik doğuran haklar, (1.Baskı), Yetkin Yayınevi.
  6. Çağlar Ö.(1999). Mukayeseli hukuk ışığında tüketiciyi koruyan geri alma hakkı, Banka ve Tic. Huk. Araş. Enst. Yayınevi, https://www.kitapyurdu.com/kitap/mukayeseli-hukuk-isigindatuketiciyi-koruyan-geri-alma-hakki/120350.html, Erişim tarihi:20.12.2020.
  7. Hatemi, H. (2011). BK. 19-20 ve TBK. 27’nin karşılaştırılması, 6098 Sayılı Türk Borçlar Kanunu Hükümlerinin Değerlendirilmesi Sempozyumu, Ankara Barosu Yasa İzleme Enstitüsü, Salmat Basım ve Yayım, 97-100.
  8. Oğuzman, M.K. & Öz, M.T. (2018). Borçlar hukuku, genel hükümler, 1, (13. Baskı), Vedat Kitapçılık. Özen, B. (2014). Tüketici kredilerinde cayma hakkının kullanılması, 4. Tüketici Hukuku Kongresi, Serozan, R. (2007). Sözleşmeden dönme, (2.Baskı), Vedat Kitapçılık. Serozan, R. (1996). Tüketiciyi koruma yasasının sözleşme hukuku alanındaki düzenlemesi’nin eleştirisi, Yasa Hukuk İçtihat ve Mevzuat Dergisi, 15(173/4), 579-598.
  9. Suat S. (2007). Bilinçaltı reklamcılık ve toplumsal etkileri, İletişim Fakültesi Dergisi, (29), 169-182.
  10. Yeşim M.A. (2016). Kredi ve diğer finansman sözleşmelerinde tüketicinin korunması, (1. Baskı), Onikilevha Yayıncılık. Yücel R. (2010). Merkez ve çevre ilişkilerine bağlı örgütsel yapı ve performans, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Tic.Ltd.Şti. Zevkliler, A., & Aydoğdu, M. (2004). Tüketicinin korunması hukuku, (3. Baskı), Seçkin yayıncılık. https://ww.Iyzico.Com/Blog/E-Commerce-Company-icin-Viral-Advertis-- What /, Erişim Tarihi: 01.06.2019