Journals / Turkish Studies - Social Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

Territory and Territoriality

Mülk ve Mülkiyet

Pages
1601–1619
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The concepts, which materialize in spatial terms, as spatial behaviours, political formations and socio-cultural areas, are analysed with examples.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Territory and territoriality are key concepts in several fields of science such as ethology, ecology, politics, law, sociology, psychology, anthropology and geography.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Understanding the substance of these concepts in terms of the formation of political, economic, socio-cultural, personal and spatial textures in geographical contexts of these concepts is vital for the accurate conducting of spatial analyses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The concepts, which materialize in spatial terms, as spatial behaviours, political formations and socio-cultural areas, are analysed with examples.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Territory and territoriality are key concepts in several fields of science such as ethology, ecology, politics, law, sociology, psychology, anthropology and geography. The use of these two concepts may vary due to both concepts being included in different disciplines and due to semantic changes with time. The fact that they serve numerous scales and objectives from the daily lives of people to global forms which are the ultimate levels of political organizations complicates methodological approaches and analyses of these concepts. Understanding the substance of these concepts in terms of the formation of political, economic, socio-cultural, personal and spatial textures in geographical contexts of these concepts is vital for the accurate conducting of spatial analyses. Within this framework, in the literature part of this study, these concepts are discussed through approaches in different fields, primarily geography. Therefore, this study is written in an interdisciplinary and holistic approach based on literature regarding territory and territoriality in several scientific fields and geography. At the outset of the study, the etymology of the territory and territoriality concepts is examined. It is followed by the ontological connection of the concepts to the concepts ‘mülk’ (territory) and ‘mülkiyet’ (territoriality), which are argued to be their Turkish equivalents. Territory and territoriality are analysed in different disciplines and their interdisciplinary dimension are examined. The quality of these concepts which is observed in three different forms in spatial terms is presented in the final part of this study. The concepts, which materialize in spatial terms, as spatial behaviours, political formations and socio-cultural areas, are analysed with examples.

Özet

Territory (mülk) ve territoriality (mülkiyet) etoloji, ekoloji, siyaset, hukuk, sosyoloji, psikoloji, antropoloji ve coğrafya gibi birçok bilim dalında anahtar kavramlardır. Her iki kavramın da farklı disiplinlerde yer alması ve zaman içerisinde anlamsal değişime bağlı olarak kullanımları da değişebilmektedir. İnsanların günlük yaşamından siyasal örgütlenmelerin en üst düzeyi olan küresel yapılara kadar farklı ölçeklerde ve amaçlara yönelik olması, kavramların metodolojik olarak yaklaşımını ve incelenmesini de güçleştirmektedir. Kavramların coğrafi açıdan siyasi, ekonomik, sosyo-kültürel ve kişisel mekânsal dokuların oluşumuna yönelik içeriğinin anlaşılması mekânsal analizlerinin doğru şekilde yapılmasında önem taşımaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışmada kavramlar alan yazında coğrafya başta olmak üzere faklı alanlardaki yaklaşımları üzerinden ele alınmıştır. Bunun için çalışma territory (mülk) ve territoriality (mülkiyet) üzerine çeşitli bilim dallarında ve coğrafya alanında oluşan literatüre dayalı disiplinler arası ve bütünsel bir yaklaşımla kaleme alınmıştır. Çalışmada öncelikle territory (mülk) ve territoriality (mülkiyet) kavramlarının etimolojisi incelenmiştir. Daha sonrasında ise kavramların Türkçe karşılıkları olduğu savunulan mülk (territory) ve mülkiyet (territoriality) kavramları ile ontolojik bağı kurulmuştur. Ayrıca çalışmada mülk (territory) ve mülkiyet (territoriality) kavramlarının farklı disiplinlerdeki analizi ile interdisipliner boyutu irdelenmiştir. Kavramların mekân üzerinde somut olarak üç şekilde görünen nitelikleri ise son bölüm olarak incelenmiştir. Mekânda; mekânsal davranışlar, siyasal oluşumlar ve sosyo-kültürel alanlar olarak somutlaşan bu kavramlar örnekler ile analiz edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARABAĞ, S., ORHAN, B. (2022). Territory and Territoriality. Turkish Studies - Social Sciences, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 1601–1619. https://ajindex.com/articles/618072

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Agnew, J. (2005). Sovereignty regims: Territoriality and state authority in contemporary world politics. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 95(2), 437-461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2005.00468.x
  2. Ardrey, R. (1966). The territorial imprative: A personal ınquiry into the animal orgins of property and nations. Atheneum Publishers.
  3. Astonsich, M. (2010). Rethinking territory. Progress Human Geography, 35(3), 422-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510385619
  4. Antonsich, M. (2017). Territory and territoriality. In D. Richardson, N. Castree, M. F. Goodchild, A. Kobayashi, W. Liu, & R. A. Marston (Eds.)The International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Enviroment, and Technology, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0022
  5. Bufon, M. (2015). Territoriality and political geography (Problems of Territoriality ın Political and Cultural Geography). Unpublished. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4596.8483
  6. Burt, W.H. (1943). Territoriality and home range as applied to mamals. Journal of Mammology, 24(3), 346-352. https://doi.org/10.2307/1374834
  7. Childe, G. (2009).Tarihte neler oldu? Kırmızı Yayınları.
  8. Cox, K. (2002). Political geography: Territory, state and society. Blackwell Publishing. Dalhman, C. (2009).
  9. Territory. İn C. Gallaher, C. Dalhman, M. Gikmartin, A. Mountz, & P. Shirlow (Eds.), Key Concepts in Political Geography (pp.77-86).
  10. SAGE. Delaney, D. (2005). Territory: A short ıntroduction. Blackwell Publishing. Delaney, D. (2009). Territory and territoriality. In R. Kitchin, & N. Thift (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 196-208).
  11. Elseiver Press.
  12. Devellioğlu, F. (2007). Osmanlıca-Türkçe ansiklopedik lûgat. Aydın Kitapevi. Donan, H. & Wilson, T. (2002). Sınırlar, kimlik, ulus ve devlet uçları (Çev.Z.Yaş). Ütopya Yayınevi.
  13. Edney, J. J. (1974). Human territoriality. Psychological Bulletin, 81(12), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037444
  14. Elden, S. (2009). Territory and territoriality.University of Minnesota Press.
  15. Elden, S. (2010a). Thinking territory historically. Geopolitics, 15(4), 757-761. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650041003717517
  16. Elden, S. (2010b). Land, terrain, territory. Progress in Human Geography, 34(6), 799-817. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132510362603
  17. Elden, S. (2011). Territory. In J. Agnew, & J. S. Duncan (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Human Geography (pp. 260-270).
  18. Blackwell Publishing. Elden, S. (2013a). The birth of territory.University of Chicago Press.
  19. Elden, S. (2013b). T