SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Studies - Social Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2

Corporte Social Responsibility from Employees’ Perspective

Çalışanların Bakış Açısından Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk

Ebru Beyza BAYARÇELİK
Hande Begüm BUMİN DOYDUK
Pages
159–172
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Structural equation model was utilized to analyze the data.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been an important area of study for both academic andbusiness world for the last decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Literature divides commitment into three dimensions as affective, continuous, and normative.Generally affective commitment dimension is used to examine the relation between CSR performance andcommitment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Structural equation model was utilized to analyze the data.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been an important area of study for both academic andbusiness world for the last decades. The phrase social responsibility associate with philanthropy. However, itis not the only responsibility of a corporation. The responsibilities of a corporation can be grouped undereconomic, legal, ethical and philanthropic responsibilities. The philanthropic responsibilities target the welfareof the general public and environment. CSR activities provide benefits for the environment and the generalpublic. Along with that the corporations also benefit from these activities as they create customer and employeesatisfaction and commitment. CSR activities can be seen both as an external and an internal marketing tool.The internal customers of a firm, the employees are of prime importance for firms. They are importantstakeholders within the organization service- profit chain model. Employees are one of the crucial stakeholdersof a firm as they affect and are affected by the actions of firms. One of the end results that firms aim to attainthrough CSR programs is employee commitment. Commitment is long term relationships between firms andtheir employees. Literature divides commitment into three dimensions as affective, continuous, and normative.Generally affective commitment dimension is used to examine the relation between CSR performance andcommitment. In this study the relationship among firms’ beliefs in CSR, higher order quality of work life,perceived external prestige and commitment are analyzed. The 5-point Likert scale survey was conducted to300 employees working in different firms in Istanbul. After eliminating missing data, analyses were conductedwith 262 surveys. Structural equation model was utilized to analyze the data.

Özet

Kurumsal Sosyal Sorumluluk (KSS) kavramı son yıllarda hem akademide hem de iş dünyasında önemli bir çalışma alanı haline gelmiştir. Sosyal sorumluluk denilince akla ilk hayırseverlik gelse de firmaların sorumluluk alanı bununla sınırlı değildir. Firma sorumluluk alanlarını ekonomik, hukuki, etik ve hayırseverlik olarak sınıflandırmak mümkündür. Hayırseverlik sınıfında yer alan sorumluluklarla çevrenin ve toplumun genel refahı hedeflenir. Genel olarak toplum ve çevre yararına olan tüm bu aktivitelerden aynı zamanda firmalar da müşteri ve çalışan memnuniyeti ve bağlılığı yaratmak suretiyle fayda sağlamış olurlar. Bu açıdan bakıldığında KSS aktiviteleri hem içsel hem de dışsal pazarlama aracı olarak görülebilir. Firmaların içsel müşterisi olan çalışanlar, firma için birincil öneme sahiptir. Çalışanlar, hizmet- kar zinciri modelinde firma için çok önemli bir paydaştır. Çalışanlar firmanın aktivitelerini hem etkileyip hem de ondan etkilenirler. Firmaların KSS programları aracılığıyla elde etmek istedikleri hedeflerden biri de çalışan bağlılığıdır. Bağlılık firma ile çalışanlar arasındaki uzun dönemli ilişkidir. Yazın bağlılığı; duygusal, devamlı ve normative bağlılık olarak üçe ayırmaktadır. Genellikle kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk ile bağlılık ilişkisinin incelendiği çalışmalarda, duygusal bağlılık boyutu kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmada, firmanın kurumsal sosyal sorumluluk inancı, dışsal prestij algısı, yüksek iş yaşam kalitesi ve bağlılık arasındaki ilişki incelenmiştir. 5’li Likert ölçeğinin kullanıldığı anketlerle İstanbul’da farklı firmalarda çalışan 300 kişiye ulaşılmıştır. Eksik anketler çıkarıldığında 262 anket ile analizlere devam edilmiştir. Verinin analizinde Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli kullanılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYARÇELİK, E. B., DOYDUK, H. B. B. (2022). Corporte Social Responsibility from Employees’ Perspective. Turkish Studies - Social Sciences, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 2, 159–172. https://ajindex.com/articles/617980

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D. E., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of management review, 836-863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678.
  2. Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2012). What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of management, 932-968. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311436079
  3. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1- 18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  4. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 20-39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999
  5. Backhaus, K. B., Stone, B. A., & Heiner, K. (2002). Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Business and Society, 41(3), 292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650302041003003
  6. Berry, L. L. (1981). The employee as customer. Journal of Retail Banking, 25-80.
  7. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper&Row. Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling. Oxford University Press.
  8. Brown, T. J., Dacin, P. A., Pratt, M. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology. Academy of Marketing Science Journal, 34(2), 99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284969
  9. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Rayton, B. (2007). The contribution of corporate social responsibility to organizational commitment. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(10), 1701-1719. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701570866
  10. Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with EQS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203726532
  11. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
  12. Daugherty, E. L. (2001). Public relations and social responsibility. R. Heath içinde, Handbook of Public Relations (s. 389-401). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452220727.n31
  13. Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational ada