Journals / Turkish Studies - Social Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 6

The Effect of Trust, Commitment and Relational Satisfaction among The Relationship Quality Dimensions on Consumer-Based Brand Equity Dimensions: A Model Proposal

İlişkisel Kalite Boyutlarından, Güven, Taahhüt ve İlişkisel Memnuniyetin Tüketici Temelli Marka Değeri Üzerine Etkisi

Pages
3207–3234
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Evaluating the quality of the relationship remains a problematic issue despite the acknowledgedimportance of relationships in marketing strategies, this study tries to fill this gap

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the effect of relationship quality dimensions of trust, loyalty, and relational satisfactionon consumer-based brand value has been examined and a model is proposed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Turkey's two cities (Istanbul, Istanbul) who work within theframework of consumers Karabuk University of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Committee dated16.09.2020 No. 2020/11 survey was distributed to a total of 390 people prepared according to the decision.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Evaluating the quality of the relationship remains a problematic issue despite the acknowledgedimportance of relationships in marketing strategies, this study tries to fill this gap
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2020 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the effect of relationship quality dimensions of trust, loyalty, and relational satisfactionon consumer-based brand value has been examined and a model is proposed. Since no examples of the study werefound in the literature, it was necessary to examine. Turkey's two cities (Istanbul, Istanbul) who work within theframework of consumers Karabuk University of Social Sciences and Humanities Research Ethics Committee dated16.09.2020 No. 2020/11 survey was distributed to a total of 390 people prepared according to the decision. Dueto the COVID-19 epidemic experienced by the whole world, 388 questionnaires were returned in the datacollection method performed on the internet via e-mail instead of face-to-face surveys. SPSS 21 program was usedfor demographic analysis of the data and for the explanatory factor analysis and reliability analysis of the scales.LISREL 8.7 programs were used for confirmatory factor analysis of scales and analysis of hypotheses. Thehypotheses of the study were tested by the structural equation modeling method. The findings, respectively,relationship quality dimensions; While trust, commitment, and relational satisfaction have a positive relationshipbetween consumer-based brand value dimensions, brand loyalty, and perceived quality, the effect of trust andrelational satisfaction on brand awareness/association were found to be negatively meaningless. The resultsprovide important contributions to consumer-based brand equity, relationship quality issues, and provide a wayfor both academic marketing and business owners and marketing professionals to understand the power ofrelationships. Evaluating the quality of the relationship remains a problematic issue despite the acknowledgedimportance of relationships in marketing strategies, this study tries to fill this gap

Özet

Bu çalışmada ilişkisel kalite boyutlarından güven, bağlılık ve ilişkisel memnuniyetin tüketici temelli marka değeri üzerine etkisini incelenmiştir ve bir model önerisinde bulunulmuştur. Literatürde çalışmanın örneğine rastlanmadığı için inceleme gereği duyulmuştur. Türkiye’nin iki şehrinde (İstanbul, Karabük) yaşayan tüketiciler arasında çalışma çerçevesinde Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştırmaları etik kurulu 16.09.2020 tarihli 2020/11 sayılı kararına göre hazırlanan anket toplam 390 kişiye dağıtılmıştır. Tüm dünyanın yaşadığı COVID-19 salgını sebebi ile yüz yüze anket uygulaması yerine e-posta yolu ile internet ortamında gerçekleştirilen veri toplama yönteminde geri dönüş 388 adet anket olmuştur. Verilerin demografik analizi için ve ölçeklerin açıklayıcı faktör analizi ve güvenirlilik analizi için SPSS 21 programı kullanılmıştır. Yine ölçeklerin doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ve hipotezlerin analizi için LISREL 8.7 programları kullanılmıştır. Çalışmanın hipotezleri yapısal eşitlik modellemesi yöntemi ile test edilmiştir. Bulgular, sırası ile ilişkisel kalite boyutlarından; güven, taahhüt ve ilişkisel memnuniyetin, tüketici temelli marka değeri boyutlarından marka sadakati ve algılanan kalite arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu gösterirken güven ve ilişkisel memnuniyetin marka bilinirliği/çağrışımı üzerine etkisi negatif yönde anlamsız çıkmıştır. Sonuçlar tüketici temelli marka değeri, ilişkisel kalite konularına önemli katkılar sağlamak ile birlikte hem akademik pazarlama dünyasına hem de işletme sahipleri ve pazarlama uzmanlarına ilişkilerin gücünü anlayabilmeleri için bir yol göstermektedir. İlişkinin kalitesini değerlendirmek, pazarlama stratejilerinde ilişkilerin kabul edilen önemine rağmen sorunlu bir konu olmaya devam etmektedir, bu çalışma bu eksikliği gidermeye çalışmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YEĞİN, T., DURMAZ, Y. (2022). The Effect of Trust, Commitment and Relational Satisfaction among The Relationship Quality Dimensions on Consumer-Based Brand Equity Dimensions: A Model Proposal. Turkish Studies - Social Sciences, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 6, 3207–3234. https://ajindex.com/articles/617977

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Aaker D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: capitalizing on the value of a brand name. 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)90009-4
  2. Aaker, D. A. (1996). Measuring brand equity across products and markets. California management review, 38(3), 102-120. https://dx.doi.org/10.2307/41165845
  3. Aaker, D. A., & Jacobson, R. (1994). The financial information content of perceived quality. Journal of marketing research, 31, 191-201. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152193
  4. Adjei, M. T., & Clark, M. N. (2010). Relationship marketing in A B2C context: The moderating role of personality traits. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 17(1), 73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2009.10.001
  5. Agarwal, M. K., & Rao, V. R. (1996). An empirical comparison of consumer-based measures of brand equity. Marketing letters, 7(3), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435740
  6. Berry, L. L. (1995). Relationship marketing of services growing interest, emerging perspectives. Journal of the Academy of marketing science, 23(4), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1177/009207039502300402
  7. Bhardwaj, D. (2007). Relationship marketing in context to the IT industry. Vision, 11(2), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1177/097226290701100207
  8. Bowen, J. T., & Chen, S. L. (2001). The relationship between customer loyalty and customer satisfaction. International journal of contemporary hospitality management. https://doi.org/10.1108/09596110110395893
  9. Broadbent, K., & Cooper, P. (1987). Research is good for you. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 5(1) 3-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb045740
  10. Brucks, M., Zeithaml, V. A., & Naylor, G. (2000). Price and brand name as indicators of quality dimensions for consumer durables. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 28(3), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300283005
  11. Buyukozturk, S. (2010). A manual on data analysis in social sciences. Pegem Academy. Cobb-Walgren, C. J., Ruble, C. A., & Donthu, N. (1995). Brand equity, brand preference, and purchase intent. Journal of advertising, 24(3), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1995.10673481
  12. Crosby, L. A., Evans, K. R., & Cowles, D. (1990). Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. Journal of marketing, 54(3), 68-81. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251817
  13. Çokluk, Ö., & Koçak, D. (2016). Using Horn's Parallel Analysis Method in Exploratory Factor Analysis for Determining the Number of Factors. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 16(2), 537-551. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2016.2.