Journals / Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4

Public Diplomacy Practices in Turkish Foreign Policy (2002-2013)*

Türk Dış Politikasında Kamu Diplomasisi Pratiği (2002- 2013)

Pages
1277–1295
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Humanity has displayed many examples of power struggles to be able to dominate the earth and become an influential actor on earth since the day it was founded.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Humanity has displayed many examples of power struggles to be able to dominate the earth and become an influential actor on earth since the day it was founded.
📊
Key Findings & Data:When the Justice and Development Party (Ak Party) came to power, as the traditional foreign policy concept could not meet the requirements of this new system, an active and multi-lingual foreign policy with new strategies in Turkish foreign policy was started to be implemented.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Besides, it aims to reveal the obstacles hindering to achieve a more active and ethical public diplomacy and the kind of organization that is needed to be carried into effect.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Humanity has displayed many examples of power struggles to be able to dominate the earth and become an influential actor on earth since the day it was founded. For that reason, there were wars between states; many tactics and techniques were used to win these wars. This process, which started with diplomacy and propaganda, continues with public diplomacy, a concept we often hear today. Public diplomacy aims to establish communication with the public of different countries and to gain the sympathy of them, to keep them under the influence of its charm, to change their perceptions and to govern them in the direction they want. The public diplomacy that emerged in the second half of the twentieth century and started to be used often, especially in the post-Cold War period, became more important in international relations after the questioning of the fact that the state is the cornerstone of international politics. At present, multilateral relations and interdependence among nations have become necessary in the international system. When the Justice and Development Party (Ak Party) came to power, as the traditional foreign policy concept could not meet the requirements of this new system, an active and multi-lingual foreign policy with new strategies in Turkish foreign policy was started to be implemented. This study discusses the public diplomacy activities in line with the principles guiding the post-2002 foreign policy, the concept of public diplomacy and the application and historical development of Turkish foreign policy. The role of public diplomacy institutions and their roles on Turkish public diplomacy before and after Ak Party’s coming to power is examined. Besides, it aims to reveal the obstacles hindering to achieve a more active and ethical public diplomacy and the kind of organization that is needed to be carried into effect.

🔖

Cite This Article

Gündoğdu, S., Arafat, M. (2022). Public Diplomacy Practices in Turkish Foreign Policy (2002-2013)*. Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 4, 1277–1295. https://ajindex.com/articles/617695

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Akçadağ, E. (2013). Türk dış politikası ve kamu diplomasisi. H. Çomak, & C. Sancaktar içinde, Türk dış politikasında yeni yönelimler. Beta Basım. Akıllı, E. (2016). Türkiye’de devlet kimliği ve dış politika. Nobel Yayınevi.
  2. Akşin, S. (1999). Atatürk’ün dış siyaset modeli, çağdaş Türk diplomasisi: 200 yıllık süre, Türk Tarih Kurumu. Aron, R. (1966). Peaceand war: a theory of ınternational relations, Doubleday & Company. Ateş, D. (2013). Uluslararası politika. Dora Yayıncılık. Aydemir, E. (2016).
  3. Dış politikada yumuşak güç ve medya, Kalkedon. Aydın Kılıç, E. (2015). Bir kamu diplomasisi aracı olarak TRT kurumu. M. Şahin, & B. Çevik içinde, Türk dış politikası ve kamu diplomasisi. Nobel Yayıncılık. Beng, P. K. (2008). “Turkey’s potential as a softpower: a call for conceptual clarity.(21- 40)InsightTurkey.10(2). Benli Altınışık, M. (2008). The possibilities and limits of turkey’s soft power in the middle east. (41- 54) Insight Turkey, 10(2). Bilkan, A. F. (2010). Yunus Emre Türk Kültür Merkezleri. A. R. Usul içinde, Yükselen Değer Türkiye. İstanbul: http://www.musiad.org.tr/F/Root/Pdf/Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rma%20 Raporlar%C4%B1/Ara%C5%9Ft%C4%B1rma%20Raporlar%C4%B1/Yukselen_Deger_T urkiye.pdf. Cull, N. (2009).
  4. Cull, Public diplomacy: lessons from the past. Figueroa Press.
  5. Çevik, B. (2014). Uluslararası halkla ilişkilerde insani yardımlar: kamu diplomasisi boyutu. Stratejik Düşünce Enstitüsü. Dedeoğlu, B. (2011). Güç kavramı, kamu diplomasisi ve güvenlik. Ekopolitik Uluslararasi İlişkiler Masası. Deringil, S. (2007). İktidarın sembolleri ve ideoloji II. Abdülhamid dönemi (1876- 1909).
  6. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  7. Devran, Y. (2012). Türk tarihi perspektifinden kamu diplomasisi olgusuna bakış ya da tarihi potansiyeli yeniden düşünmek. A. Özkan, & T. Ersoy içinde,Kamu diplomasisi. TASAM Yayınları.
  8. Ekşi, M. (2014). Kamu diplomasisi ve Ak parti dönemi Türk dış politikası, Siyasal Kitabevi.
  9. Fidan, H. (2013). A work in progress: the new turkish foreign policy. Middle East Policy Council: https://mepc.org/work-progress-new-turkish-foreign-policy (91-96)
  10. Gullion, E. (1965). What is public diplomacy? Tufts University: the fletcher school of law and diplomacy. http://fletcher.tufts.edu/Murrow/Diplomacy.
  11. Güngörmez, O. (2017). Türkiye’nin kamu diplomasisi politikasın ın yükselişi. K. İnat, A. Aslan, & B. Duran içinde, Ak partinin 15 yılı: dış politika. SETA. Holsti, K. (1964). The concept of power in the study of ınternational relations. Background, 7(4). İnalcık, H. (2000). Osmanlı İmpa