Journals / Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics / 2021 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1

Obtaining Performance and Value with Business Intelligence

İş Zekâsı ile Performans ve Değer Elde Etme

Pages
279–303
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, it has been determined that perceived satisfaction and perceived value affect job performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Today, organizations aim to benefit from the systems they use as the main target.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Business intelligence systems which play an active role affect business performance and offes the opportunity to transform the benefits obtained into value.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, it has been determined that perceived satisfaction and perceived value affect job performance.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Today, organizations aim to benefit from the systems they use as the main target. In this respect, high investments have been made in these systems. Business processes are changing with business intelligence and are designed in accordance with the needs. Business intelligence systems which play an active role affect business performance and offes the opportunity to transform the benefits obtained into value. Therefore, business performance and satisfaction to be obtained from business intelligence systems will also highlight the perceived value. It is important which structures are effective in determining the performance to be achieved by users with business intelligence. In this study, the structures that affect business performance were investigated by considering business intelligence systems within the framework of information systems success model. In the research design, the survey was preferred as the method to obtain the datas to be used in the study. The datas used in the survey was obtained through face to face interviews from users who actively use business intelligence systems in 2017. In this study, survey datas obtained from high-level, middle-level and professional employees using business intelligence systems. The survey datas were evaluated using structural equation modeling. Information quality, system quality, perceived satisfaction, perceived value and work performance dimensions were discussed in the study. After the validity and reliability analysis of the research, the relationships between the determined structures were examined. As a result of the research, it was seen that the quality of information and system quality had an effect on perceived satisfaction and perceived value. In addition, it has been determined that perceived satisfaction and perceived value affect job performance.

Özet

Geçmişten günümüze organizasyonlar kullandıkları sistemlerden ana hedef olarak fayda görmeyi hedeflemişlerdir. Bu bakımdan bu sistemlere yüksek yatırımlar yapılmıştır. İş zekâsı ile iş süreçleri değişim göstermekte ve ihtiyaca uygun bir şekilde tasarlanmaktadır. İş zekâsı sistemleri bu süreçlerde etkin rol oynayarak iş performansını etkileyerek; elde edilen faydaları da değere dönüştürme imkânı sunmaktadır. Bu yüzden iş zekâsı sistemlerinden elde edilecek olan iş performansı ve memnuniyet algılanan değeri de öne çıkaracaktır. İş zekâsı ile kullanıcıların elde edeceği performansı belirlemede hangi yapıların etkili olduğu önemlidir. Bu araştırmada iş zekâsı sistemleri bilgi sistemleri başarı modeli çerçevesinde ele alınarak iş performansına etki eden yapılar araştırılmıştır. Araştırma tasarımında çalışmada kullanılacak verilerin elde edilme yöntemi olarak anket tercih edilmiştir. Ankette kullanılan veriler 2017 yılında iş zekâsı sistemlerini aktif olarak kullanan kullanıcılardan yüz yüze görüşmeler ile elde edilmiştir. Bu çalışmada iş zekâsı sistemlerini kullanan üst düzey, orta düzey ve profesyonel çalışanlardan elde edilen anket verileri yapısal eşitlik modellemesi kullanılarak değerlendirilmiştir. Araştırmada bilgi kalitesi, sistem kalitesi, algılanan memnuniyet, algılanan değer ve iş performansı boyutları ele alınmıştır. Araştırmanın geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik analizlerinden sonra belirlenen yapılar arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda bilgi kalitesi ve sistem kalitesinin algılanan memnuniyet ve algılanan değer üzerinde etkili olduğu görülmüştür. Ayrıca algılanan memnuniyet ve algılanan değerin iş performansını etkilediği belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

EREN, A., KAYA, M. D. (2022). Obtaining Performance and Value with Business Intelligence. Turkish Studies - Economics, Finance, Politics, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 1, 279–303. https://ajindex.com/articles/617677

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Al-Debei, M. M., Jalal, D. & Al-Lozi, E. (2013). Measuring web portals success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 14(1), 96-133.
  2. Alshibly, H. H. (2015). Investigating decision support system (DSS) success: a partial least squares structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 6(4), 2152- 1034. Bojanic, D. C. (1996). Consumer perceptions of price, value and satisfaction in the hotel industry: An exploratory study. Journal of Hospitality & Leisure Marketing, 4(1), 5-22.
  3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Yayıncılık. Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. Chaudhuri, S., Dayal, U. & Narasayya, V. (2011). An overview of business intelligence technology. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 88-98.
  4. Chen, C. W. D. & Cheng, C. Y. J. (2009). Understanding consumer intention in online shopping: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 28(4), 335-345.
  5. Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern methods for business research, 295(2), 295-336.
  6. Chin-ChehYi, P. W. L., Huang, C. F. & Hwang, I. H. (2010). Acceptance of mobile learning: a respecification and validation of information system success. International Journal of Human and Social Sciences, 5(7), 477-481.
  7. Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., Sun, S. Y., Lin, T. C. & Sun, P. C. (2005). Usability, quality, value and elearning continuance decisions. Computers & Education, 45(4), 399-416
  8. Croasmun, J. T. & Ostrom, L. (2011). Using Likert-type scales in the social sciences. Journal of Adult Education, 40(1), 19-22.
  9. Cui, Z., Damiani, E. & Leida, M. (2007, February). Benefits of ontologies in real time data access. In Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference, 2007. DEST'07. Inaugural IEEE-IES (392-397).
  10. IEEE. Davern, M. J., & Kauffman, R. J. (2000). Discovering potential and realizing value from information technology investments. Journal of Management Information Systems, 16(4), 121-143. Delone W. & Mclean, E. (1992) Information systems success: The quest for the independent variable, Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60-95.
  11. Delone, W. H. & Mclean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal Of Manageme