Journals / Turkish Neurosurgery / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

Surgical Position, Cause of extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection, Presenting as Pourfour Du Petit Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review

Cerrahi Pozisyon Nedeniyle Ekstrakraniyal İnternal Karotid Arter Diseksiyonunun Pourfour Du Petit Sendromu Olarak Ortaya Çıkması: Olgu Sunumu ve Literatür Derlemesi

Pages
666–669
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Dissection of the internal carotid artery is a rare cause of stroke overall, but causes 22% of strokes in younger patients.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dissection of the internal carotid artery is a rare cause of stroke overall, but causes 22% of strokes in younger patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We report a craniotomy with 30 degrees rotation of the neck (standard position) in a patient with no major risk factors for carotid dissection, who showed a Pourfour du Petit syndrome due to a dissection of the internal carotid artery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The presentation with Pourfour du Petit syndrome is extremely unusual.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Dissection of the internal carotid artery is a rare cause of stroke overall, but causes 22% of strokes in younger patients. A common clinical presentation is as Claude Bernard Horner syndrome. We report a craniotomy with 30 degrees rotation of the neck (standard position) in a patient with no major risk factors for carotid dissection, who showed a Pourfour du Petit syndrome due to a dissection of the internal carotid artery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case in which a common surgical position causes an internal carotid artery dissection in a patient without relevant risk factors. The presentation with Pourfour du Petit syndrome is extremely unusual.

Özet

İnternal karotid arter diseksiyonu genel olarak inmenin nadir bir nedenidir ama daha genç hastalarda inmelerin %22'sine neden olur. Sık görülen bir klinik sunum Claude Bernard Horner sendromudur. Karotid diseksiyon için majör risk faktörleri olmayan ve boynun 30 derece rotasyonuyla (standart pozisyon) kraniyotomi yapılan bir hastada internal karotid arter diseksiyonu nedeniyle Pourfour du Petit sendromu gelişmesini sunuyoruz. Bildiğimiz kadarıyla bu ilgili risk faktörleri olmayan bir hastada sık kullanılan bir cerrahi pozisyonun internal karotid arter diseksiyonuna neden olduğu ilk bildirilen olgudur. Pourfour du Petit sendromu ile birlikte durum son derece nadirdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARTINEZ, G. V., GOMEZ, I. N., PEREZ, L. S., ORTIZ, S. G., STEINHAUER, E. G., FERNÁNDEZ, J. L. C. (2022). Surgical Position, Cause of extracranial Internal Carotid Artery Dissection, Presenting as Pourfour Du Petit Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review. Turkish Neurosurgery, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 666–669. https://ajindex.com/articles/616951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Ahmad HA, Gerraty RP, Davis SM, Cameron PA: Cervicocerebral artery dissections. Jaccid Emerg Me 16:422-424, 1999 2. Assendelft WJ, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG: Complications of spinal manipulation. A comprehensive review of the literature. J Family Pract 42:475-480, 1996 3. Balik V, Kolembus P, Svajdler M, Sulla I, Vaverka M, Hrabalek L: A case report of rapid spontaneous redistribution of acute supratentorial subdural hematoma to the entire spinal subdural space presenting as a Pourfour du Peit syndrome and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 115(7):849- 852, 2012 4. CADISS Trial Investigators: Antiplatelet therapy versus anticoagulation in cervical artery dissection: Rationale and design of the cervical artery dissection in stroke study (CADISS). International Journal of Stroke 2:292-296, 2007 5. Debette S, Leys D: Cervical artery dissections: Predisposing factors, diagnosis and outcome. Lancet Neurol 8:668-678, 2009 6. Dziewas R, Konrad C, Drager B, Evers S, Besselman M, Kuhlenbaumer G, Stogbauer F, Ringelstein EB: Cervical artery dissection- clinical features, risk factors, therapy and outcome in 126 patients. J Neurol 250:1179-1184, 2003 7. Ernst E: Vascular accidents after neck manipulation. Cause or coincidence? Int J Clin Practice 64:673-677, 2010 8. Georgiadis D1, Lanczik O, Schwab S, Engelter S, Sztajzel R, Arnold M, Siebler M, Schwarz S, Lyrer P, Baumgartner RW: Iv thrombolysis in patients with acute stroke due to spontaneous carotid dissection. Neurology 64:1612-1614, 2005 9. Gould DB, Cunninham K: Internal carotid artery dissection after remote surgery. Iatrogenic complications of anesthesia. Stroke 25:1276-1278, 1994 10. Haneline MT, Lewkovich GN: An analysis of the etiology of cervical artery dissection:1994 to 2003. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 28: 617-622, 2005 11. Haynes MJ, Vincent K, Fischhoff C, Bremner AP, Lanlo O, Hankey GJ: Assessing the risk of stroke from neck manipulation a systematic review. Int J Clin Pract 66(10):940-947, 2012 12. Kapral MK, Bondy SJ: Cervical manipulation and the risk of stroke. CMAJ 165:907-908, 2001 13. Koennecke H, Friedwald JP, Hartigan M: Iatrogenic dissection of the common carotid artery: Diagnosis by dynamic image and color flow Doppler ultrasonography. J Clin Ultrasound 19:250-253, 1991 14. Lee VH, Brown RD, Jayawant N, Mandrekar JN, Mokri B: Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection. A population based study. Neurology 67:1809-1812, 2006 15. Lleva P, Ahluwalia BS, Marks S, Sahni