✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Instead, we attempt to give a short introductory review on cladistics which has been widely practised in the last three decades.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Taxonomy has always been a controversial field of biology because it is interlinked with other biological areas, and also requires a philosophy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Currently, four main schools are practising taxonomy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Instead, we attempt to give a short introductory review on cladistics which has been widely practised in the last three decades.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Taxonomy has always been a controversial field of biology because it is interlinked with other biological areas, and also requires a philosophy. Currently, four main schools are practising taxonomy. These are traditional taxonomy, phenetics, evolutionary taxonomy and cladistics. Each one has different approaches either in their philosophy or methodology. The task, here, is not to argue which one is superior or to recommend one for usage. Instead, we attempt to give a short introductory review on cladistics which has been widely practised in the last three decades.
🔖
Cite This Article
BAŞIBÜYÜK, H. H., ÇIPLAK, B. (2022). Phylogenetic systematic: a short introductory review on its terms, principles and thechniques. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 3, 241–257. https://ajindex.com/articles/616855