The populations inhabiting the western and eastern sides of the Köyceğiz Canal are distinctly different from each other regarding their supratemporai stripe characteristics.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the material collected from Köyceğiz Specially Protected Area, and islands in the vicinity of Marmaris were divided into four different populations and examined comperatively from the view point of taxonomic characters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, the material collected from Köyceğiz Specially Protected Area, and islands in the vicinity of Marmaris were divided into four different populations and examined comperatively from the view point of taxonomic characters.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The populations inhabiting the western and eastern sides of the Köyceğiz Canal are distinctly different from each other regarding their supratemporai stripe characteristics.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
In this study, the material collected from Köyceğiz Specially Protected Area, and islands in the vicinity of Marmaris were divided into four different populations and examined comperatively from the view point of taxonomic characters. The populations inhabiting the western and eastern sides of the Köyceğiz Canal are distinctly different from each other regarding their supratemporai stripe characteristics.
Özet
Bu çalışmada Köyceğiz Özel Koruma Bölgesi ve Marmaris civarındaki adalardan toplanan materyal dört populasyona ayrılarak taksonomik karakterleri karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmiştir. Sonuç olarak da Köyceğiz gölü kanalının doğu ve batısındaki populasyonların sırt ortası yanlarındaki (Supratemporai) çizgiler bakımından birbirlerinden bariz farklılık gösterdikleri tespit edilmiştir.
🔖
Cite This Article
KUMLUTAŞ, Y., BARAN, İ. (2022). On Lacerta danfordi (Reptila: Lacertidae) population of the Köyceğiz specially protected area. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: supp1, 7–13. https://ajindex.com/articles/616762
Werner, F., Die Reptilien und Amphibien Fauna von Kleinasien, Sitz. Ber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math. Nat. Kl.III, 1: 1057-1121, 1902
Werner, F., Über Reptilien und Batrachier aus West-Asian (Anatolien und Persien). Zool. Jb. Abt. F. Syst. Jena, 19: 329- 346, 1903
Bird, C.G., The distribution of reptiles and amphibians in Asiatic Turkey, with notes on a collection from the Vilayets of Adana, Gaziantep and Malatya, Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. (10) 18: 257-281, 1936
Bodenheimer, F., S., Introduction into the knowledge of the Amphibia and Reptilia of Turkey, Rev. Fac. Sci. ‹stanbul, Ser. B. 9: I-78, 1944
Mertens, R., Amphibien und Reptilien aus der Türkei, Rev. Fac. Sci. Univ. İstanbul, Ser. B: 17: 41-75, 1952
Wettstein, O., Ergebnisse zoologischer sammelreisen in der Türkei: Versuch einer Klarung des Rassenkreisses von Lacerta danfordi GTHR. 1876. Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien, 70: 345-356, 1967
Budak, A., Anadolu ‘da yaşayan Lacarta laevis, L danfordi ve L. anatolica‘nın Taksonomik Durumları ve Cografi Yayılışları Üzerinde Araştırmalar, Ege Üniv. Fen Fak. İlmi Raporlar Serisi., No.214, Bornova/İzmir, 59pp., 1976
Başoğlu, M., Baran, İ., Türkiye Sürüngenleri, Kısım I. Kaplumbağa ve Kertenkeleler, Ege Üniv. Fen Fak. Kitaplar Serisi, No.76, Bornova/İzmir, 272pp., 1977
Baran, İ., Güneydo¤u Anadolu‘dan Yeni Lacerta danfordi Materyali Hakkında. Ege Üniv. Fen Fak. Derg. Ser. B, 1: 325-330, 1978
Eiselt, J., Schmidtler, J.F., Der Lacerta danfordi Komplex (Reptilia: Lacertidae). Spixiana 9: 289-328, 1987
Malseven, M., Fethiye Bölgesi ‘nde Lacerta danfordi (Reptilia: Lacertidae) Populasyonunun Araştırılması, D.E.Ü. Buca Eğt. Fak. Biyo. Böl. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 1994
Mayr, E., Principles of Systematic Zoology, Mc. Graw-Hill Book Co., Inc., New York, 1969.