Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2

The evolutionary trend of platform denticulation in Middle Triassic acuminate Gondolellidae (Conodonta)

Pages
187–197
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the increase in complexity in the platform denticulation is an important evolutionary trend, three new genera areproposed: Guexispathodus n. gen., Marquezella n. gen., and Kirilella n. gen., which, together with Pseudofurnishius and Mosherella,represent the subfamily Marquezellinae n. subfam.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Acuminate Middle-Late Triassic Gondolellidae are characterized by an ellipsoid platform with a central to posterioramygdaloid basal cavity and an octomembrate apparatus of gondolelloid affinity.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Starting with a neospathodiform proteromorph duringthe Anisian, their anagenetic lineage developed during the Fassanian, Longobardian, and Julian, ending in another neospathodiformproteromorph.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the increase in complexity in the platform denticulation is an important evolutionary trend, three new genera areproposed: Guexispathodus n. gen., Marquezella n. gen., and Kirilella n. gen., which, together with Pseudofurnishius and Mosherella,represent the subfamily Marquezellinae n. subfam.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Acuminate Middle-Late Triassic Gondolellidae are characterized by an ellipsoid platform with a central to posterioramygdaloid basal cavity and an octomembrate apparatus of gondolelloid affinity. Starting with a neospathodiform proteromorph duringthe Anisian, their anagenetic lineage developed during the Fassanian, Longobardian, and Julian, ending in another neospathodiformproteromorph. As the increase in complexity in the platform denticulation is an important evolutionary trend, three new genera areproposed: Guexispathodus n. gen., Marquezella n. gen., and Kirilella n. gen., which, together with Pseudofurnishius and Mosherella,represent the subfamily Marquezellinae n. subfam.

🔖

Cite This Article

HIRSCH, F., SUDAR, M., PLASENCIA, P., KILIÇ, A. M., BAUD, A. (2022). The evolutionary trend of platform denticulation in Middle Triassic acuminate Gondolellidae (Conodonta). Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 2, 187–197. https://ajindex.com/articles/616622

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Agarwal PN, Singh SN (1981). Recent advances in micropaleontological investigations of the marine Triassic rocks of India. J Palaeontol Soc India 25: 110-125.
  2. Bagnoli G, Perri MC, Gandin A (1985). Ladinian Conodont Apparatuses from Northwestern Sardinia, Italy. Boll Soc Paleontol Ita 23: 311-323.
  3. Balini M, Jurkovsek B, Kolar-Jurkovsek T (2006). New Ladinian ammonoids from Mt. Svilaja (External Dinarides, Croatia). Riv Ital Paleontol S 112: 383-395.
  4. Bandel K, Waksmundzki B (1985). Triassic Conodonts from Jordan. Acta Gol Pol 35: 289-303.
  5. Bartusch M (1985). Geologie des Monte Santa Giusta (Nura, NW Sardinien). PhD, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany (in German). Baud A, Plasencia P, Hirsch F, Richoz S (2016). Revised Middle Triassic Stratigraphy of the Swiss Prealps based on Conodonts and correlation to the Briançonnais (Western Alps). Swiss J Geosci 109: 365-377.
  6. Benjamini C, Chepstow-Lusty A (1986). Neospathodus and other Conodonta from the Saharonim Formation (Anisian– Ladinian) at Makhtesh Ramon, Negev, southern Israel. J Micropalaeontol 5: 67-75.
  7. Brack P, Nicora A (1998). Conodonts from the Anisian - Ladinian succession of Bagolino, Brescian Prealps (Brescia, Lombardy, Northern Italy). Stop 5.1. Gior Geol 60: 314-325.
  8. Budurov KJ (1973). Carinella n. gen. und Revision der Gattung Gladigondolella (Conodonta). Cr Acad Bulg Sci 26: 799-802 (in German). Budurov KJ (1976). Die triassischen Conodonten des Ostbalkans. Geol Bal 6: 95-104 (in German). Budurov KJ, Ganev M, Stefanov S (1979). Conodontenstratigraphie der Anis-Ladin-Grenzschichten in der Trias des ElenaTvardica-Passes (Zentralbalkan). Geol Bal 9: 105-110 (in German). Buryi GI (1996). Triassic conodonts from the cherts of the Nadanhada Range, north-east China. Acta Micropal Sin 13: 207-214.
  9. Buryi GI (1997). Triassic conodont biostratigraphy of the SikhoteAlin. Mém Géo 30: 45-60.
  10. Carrillat A, Martini R, Zaninetti L, Cirilli, S Gandin, A Vrielynck (1999). The Muschelkalk (Middle to upper Triassic) of the Monte di Santa Giusta (NW Sardinia): sedimentology and biostratigraphy. Eclogae Geol Helv 92: 81-87.
  11. Chen Y, Krystyn L, Orchard MJ, Lai X, Richoz S (2016a). A review of the evolution, biostratigraphy, provincialism and diversity of Middle and early Late Triassic conodonts. Pap Palaeontol 2: 235-263.
  12. Chen Y, Krystyn L, Orchard MJ, Lai X, Richoz S (2016b). Reply to comments on: A review of the evolution, biostratigraphy, provincialism and diversity of Middle and early Late Triassic conodonts. Pap