Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2003 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

İran'daki Ellobius Fisher,1814 (Mammalia:Rodentia)'un morfolojisi,karyolojisi ve yayılışı üzerine bir çalışma

A stduy on the morphology,karyology and distribution of Ellobius Fisher,1814 (Mammalia:Rodentia) in Iran

Pages
281–292
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Karyological findings showed that E. fuscocapillus has 2n = 36 (NF = 58, NFa = 54), E. lutescens has 2n = 17 (NF = 34, NFa = 32) and E. talpinus has 2n = 52 (NF = 54, NFa = 50) chromosomes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, 180 mole-vole specimens collected from west, central, east and southeast Iran were investigated by morphological, biometrical and karyological methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:According to our findings, 3 different species, Ellobius fuscocapillus, Ellobius lutescens and Ellobius talpinus, are distributed in Iran.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Karyological findings showed that E. fuscocapillus has 2n = 36 (NF = 58, NFa = 54), E. lutescens has 2n = 17 (NF = 34, NFa = 32) and E. talpinus has 2n = 52 (NF = 54, NFa = 50) chromosomes.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, 180 mole-vole specimens collected from west, central, east and southeast Iran were investigated by morphological, biometrical and karyological methods. According to our findings, 3 different species, Ellobius fuscocapillus, Ellobius lutescens and Ellobius talpinus, are distributed in Iran. Karyological findings showed that E. fuscocapillus has 2n = 36 (NF = 58, NFa = 54), E. lutescens has 2n = 17 (NF = 34, NFa = 32) and E. talpinus has 2n = 52 (NF = 54, NFa = 50) chromosomes.

Özet

Bu çalışmada iran'ın batı, merkez, doğu ve güneydoğu bölgelerinden toplanan 180 adet Ellobius örneği morfolojik, biyometrik ve karyolojik olarak araştırıldı. Elde edilen bulgulara göre iran'da üç tür; Ellobius fuscocapillus, Ellobius lutescens ve Ellobius talpinus, yayılış göstermektedir. Karyolojik bulgular, E. fuscocapillus' ta 2n = 36 (NF = 58, NFa = 54), E. lutescens'te 2n = 17 (NF = 34, NFa = 32), E. talpinus'ta Zn = 52 (NF = 54, NFa = 50) olduğunu teyit etti

🔖

Cite This Article

GHARKHELOO, M. M. (2022). İran'daki Ellobius Fisher,1814 (Mammalia:Rodentia)'un morfolojisi,karyolojisi ve yayılışı üzerine bir çalışma. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 281–292. https://ajindex.com/articles/616608

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Blyth, 1 1843. Georychus fuscocapillus. Asiat. Soc. Bengal 10: 928, nom. nud. 1843, J. Asiat. Soc. Bengal 11-887
  2. Borisqv, Y.M., Lyapunova, E.A. and Vorontsov, N.N. 1991. Karyotype Evolution in the Genus Ellobius (Microtinae. Rodentia). Genetika 27(3): 523-532
  3. Corbet, G.B.I 978. The Mammals of the Palearctic Region: A Taxonomic Review. London, Brit. Mus.(Nat. Hist). Cornell Univ. Press. 117-118
  4. Coşkun, Y. 1997. Türkiye Ellobius lutescens Thomas, 1897 (Rodentia: Cricetidae) Türünün Morfolojik ve Karyolojik Özellikleri. Tr. J. of Zoology. 21: 349-354
  5. Eitemad, L 1979. Mammals of Iran. Tehran Univ. Press. 2324: 226-233
  6. Ellerman, J.R. 1948. Key to the rodents of south-west Asia in the British Museum Collection. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 118: 765-816
  7. Ellerman, J.R and Morrison-Scott, T.C.S. 1951. Checklist of Palearctic and Indian Mammals, 1780 to 1946. Brit. Mus. Nat Hist. London 1-810
  8. Fischer, V.W., Ellobius. Zoognosia, 3: 72. Mus talpinus Pallas, 1814
  9. Ford, C.E. and Hamerton, J.L. 1956. A colchicine hypotonic citrate squash sequence for mammalian chromosomes. Stain Technol. 31:247-251. 10.Goodwin, G.,G. 1940. Ellobius fuscocapillus lengendrei. Amer. Mus. Nov. 1082. 11.Harrison, D.L and Bates, PJJ. 1991. The Mammals of Arabia. 2nd ed., Kent, England. Harr. Zool. Museum Pub. 305-307. 12.Lay, D.M. 1967. A Study of the Mammals of Iran, Resulting from the Street Expedition of 1962-63. Fieldiana Zool., 54: 168-171. 13.Misonhe, X. 1959. Analyse Zoogeographique des Mammiferes de I'lran. Mem. Inst Roy. Sci. Nat. Belgique, Deuxieme serie, Fasc. 59:157 pp. 14.Ognev, S.L. 1950. Mammals of the USSR and adjacent countries. Vol
  10. Rodents. Moscow, 626 pp. 15.Pallas, P.S. 1770. Mus talpinus. Nov. Comm. Acad. Petropl4:' 1-568. 16.Storch, G. 1980. Spatglaziale Kleinsaeuger der Ali Tepeh-Hohle (Behshar). Zur klima ökologischen Faunengeschichte in NE-Iran (Mammalia: Insectivora-Rodentia). Senckenbergiana Biol. 60(5/6): 285-302. 17.Thomas, 0. 1897. Ellobius lutescens. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 20: 308. 18.Thomas, 0. 1905 Ellobius woosnami. Abstr. Proc. Zool. Soc. 23; Proc. Zool. Soc. 526 London. 19.Thomas, 0. 1909. Ellobius fusciceps. Ann. Mag. N. H. 3: 265. 20.Ugarov, A. 1928. Ellobius farsistani. Acta Univ. Tashkent 8a, 4: 12. 21.Vinogradov, B.S. and Argiropulo, A.I. 1941. Fauna of the USSR, Key to Rodents. IPST Trans, from Russian 1968. Jerusalem. 22.Vogel, W., Steinbach, P., Djalali, M., Mehnert, K., Ali, S. and Epplen, J.T. 1988. Chromosome 9 of E