SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2011 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4

Türkiye’de Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) ve Myotis blythii (Tomes, 1857) (Mammalia: Chiroptera)’in G-bantlama karyotipleri

G-banding karyotypes of Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) and Myotis blythii (Tomes, 1857) (Mammalia: Chiroptera) in Turkey

Tarkan YORULMAZ
İrfan ALBAYRAK
Nursel AŞAN
Sinan İNCİ
Pages
599–602
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was concluded that G-banded chromosomes are not suffi cient as a diagnostic character for separating M. myotis from M. blythii.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Th is study is based on the G-banding karyotype of 2 sibling bat species Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) (Greater Mouse-eared Myotis) and M. blythii (Tomes, 1857) (Lesser Mouse-eared Myotis) distributed in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Gbanding karyotypes showed that the 2 taxa possessed identical G-banded chromosome arms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was concluded that G-banded chromosomes are not suffi cient as a diagnostic character for separating M. myotis from M. blythii.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Th is study is based on the G-banding karyotype of 2 sibling bat species Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) (Greater Mouse-eared Myotis) and M. blythii (Tomes, 1857) (Lesser Mouse-eared Myotis) distributed in Turkey. Gbanding karyotypes showed that the 2 taxa possessed identical G-banded chromosome arms. It was concluded that G-banded chromosomes are not suffi cient as a diagnostic character for separating M. myotis from M. blythii.

Özet

Bu araştırma Türkiye’de yayılış gösteren iki sibling yarasa türü, Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) (Farekulaklı Büyük Yarasa) ile M. blythii (Tomes, 1857) (Farekulaklı Küçük Yarasa)’nin G-bantlamasına dayanmaktadır. G-bantlama karyotipleri iki taksonun aynı G-bantlama gösteren kromozom kollarına sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. G-bantlı kromozomların M. myotis’in M. blythii’den ayrımında yeterli ayırıcı özellik olmadığı tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YORULMAZ, T., ALBAYRAK, İ., AŞAN, N., İNCİ, S. (2022). Türkiye’de Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 1797) ve Myotis blythii (Tomes, 1857) (Mammalia: Chiroptera)’in G-bantlama karyotipleri. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 4, 599–602. https://ajindex.com/articles/616435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Arlettaz, R., Ruedi, M., Ibanez, C., Palmeirim, J. and Hausser, J. 1997. A new perspective on the zoogeography of the sibling mouse-eared bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii: morphological, genetical and ecological evidence. J. Zool. Lond. 242: 45-62.
  2. Aşan, N. and Alayrak, İ. 2011. Taxonomic status of Myotis myotis (Borkhausen, 177) and Myotis blythii (Tomes, 1857) in Turkey (Mammalia: Chiroptera). Turk. J. Zool. 35(3): 357-365.
  3. Baker, R.J. 1984. A sympatric cryptic species of mammal: A new species of Rhogeessa (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae). Syst. Zool. 33: 178-183.
  4. Baker, R.J., Bickham, J.W. and Arnold, M.L. 1985. Chromosomal evolution in Rhogeessa (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae): Possible speciation by centric fusions. Evolution 39: 233-243.
  5. Baker, R.J., Qumsiyeh, M.B. and Hood, C.I. 1987. Role of chromosomal banding patterns in understanding mammalian evolution. In: Current Mammalogy vol I. (ed. H. H. Genoways), Plenum Publishing Corporation, USA, pp. 67-96.
  6. Berthier, P., Excoffi er, L. and Ruedi, M. 2006. Recurrent replacement of mtDNA and cryptic hybridization between two sibling bat species Myotis myotis and Myotis blythii. Proc. R. Soc. B. 273: 3101-3109.
  7. Bickham, J.W. 1979a. Chromosomal variation and evolutionary relationships of vespertilionid bats. J. Mamm. 60: 350-363.
  8. Bickham, J. W. 1979b. Banded karyotypes of 11 species of American bats (Genus: Myotis). Cytologia 44: 789-797.
  9. Bickham, J.W. and Hafner, J.C. 1978. A chromosomal banding study of three species of vespertilionid bats from Yugoslavia. Genetica 48: 1-3.
  10. Harada, M., and Yosida, T.H. 1978. Karyological study of four Japanese Myotis bats (Chiroptera: Mammalia). Chromosoma 65: 283-291.
  11. Karataş, A., Yiğit, N., Kankılıç, T. and Çolak, E. 2004. Contribution to the distribution and karyology of some vespertilionid bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) from Turkey. Zoology in the Middle East 31: 5-12.
  12. Kulijev, G.K., and Fattajev, M.D. 1975. Karyological studies of some bat species from Azerbaijan. Sistematika i citogenetika mlekopitajuscich, Mater. Vsesoj. Symp. Moskva: 4-7 (in Russian). Patton, J.L. 1969. Chromosome studies of certain pocket mice. Genus Perognathus (Rodentia: Heteromyidae). J. Mamm. 48: 27-37.
  13. Qumsiyeh, M.B. and Baker, R.J. 1988. Comparative cytogenetics and the determination of primitive karyotypes. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 47: 100-103.
  14. Seabright, M. 1971. A rapid banding technique for human chromosomes. Lancet 2: 971-972.
  15. Volleth, M. 1987. Diff erences in the location of nucl