Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2012 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4

Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) erkeğinin ilk kez rapor edilişi ve detaylı tanımlanması

First record and detailed description of the male of Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda)

Pages
484–495
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ecological characteristics of habitats where the bisexual populations found were discussed for future studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Bisexual populations of Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 were reported for the first time from 5 different aquatic bodies in Bolu and Erzincan (Turkey).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The males were compared with the males of the other 11 species of the genus Ilyocypris (I. australiensis, I. biplicata, I. decipiens, I. dentifera, I. divisa, I. fallax, I. getica, I. gibba, I. lacustris, I. mongolica, and I. monstrifica) and described based on examinations of the soft body parts (e.g., hemipenis, legs, clasping organs) and valves.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ecological characteristics of habitats where the bisexual populations found were discussed for future studies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Bisexual populations of Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 were reported for the first time from 5 different aquatic bodies in Bolu and Erzincan (Turkey). The males were compared with the males of the other 11 species of the genus Ilyocypris (I. australiensis, I. biplicata, I. decipiens, I. dentifera, I. divisa, I. fallax, I. getica, I. gibba, I. lacustris, I. mongolica, and I. monstrifica) and described based on examinations of the soft body parts (e.g., hemipenis, legs, clasping organs) and valves. Ecological characteristics of habitats where the bisexual populations found were discussed for future studies.

Özet

Ilyocypris inermis’in Kaufmann, 1900 biseksüel populasyonu Bolu ve Erzincan’daki (Türkiye) beş farklı sucul ortamdan ilk kez kayıt edilmiştir. Erkekler bu cinse ait erkekleri olan diğer 11 türle (I. australiensis, I. biplicata, I. decipiens, I. dentifera, I. divisa, I. fallax, I. getica, I. gibba, I. lacustris, I. mongolica, I. monstrifi ca) temel olarak yumuşak vücut bölümleri (Örn., hemipenis, ayaklar, tutunma organları) ve kabuk kısımlarına göre karşılaştırıldı ve tanımlandı. Sonraki çalışmalar için biseksüel popülasyonlarının bulunduğu ortamların ekolojik özellikleri tartışıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜLKÖYLÜOĞLU, O., AKDEMİR, D., SARI, N. (2022). Ilyocypris inermis Kaufmann, 1900 (Crustacea, Ostracoda) erkeğinin ilk kez rapor edilişi ve detaylı tanımlanması. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 4, 484–495. https://ajindex.com/articles/616409

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Bode, S.N.S., Adolfsson, S., Lamatsch, D.K., Martins, M.J.F., Schmit, O., Vandekerkhove, J., Mezquita, F., Namiotko, T., Rossetti, G., Schön, I., Butlin, R.K. and Martens, K. 2010. Exceptional cryptic diversity and multiple origins of parthenogenesis in a freshwater ostracod. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 54: 542-552.
  2. Brehm, V. 1929. Fresh-water fauna of New Zealand. Nos. 2-6. Trans. New Zealand Inst. 59: 793-806.
  3. Broodbakker, N.W. and Danielopol, D.L. 1982. Th e chaetotaxy of Cypridacea (Crustacea, Ostracoda) limbs: proposals for a descriptive model. Bijdr. Dierk. 52: 103-120.
  4. Butlin, R.K., Schön, I. and Griffiths, H.I. 1998. Introduction to reproductive modes. In: Sex and Parthenogenesis: Evolutionary Ecology of Reproductive Modes in Non-Marine Ostracods. (ed. K. Martens). Backhuys Publishers, pp. 1-24.
  5. Cohen, A.C. and Morin, J.G. 1990. Patterns of reproduction in ostracodes; a review. J. Crust. Biol. 10: 84-211.
  6. Danielopol, D.L. 1969. Recherches sur la morphologie de l’organe copulateur mâle chez quelques ostracodes du genre Candona Baird (Fam. Cyprididae Baird). In: The Taxonomy, Morphology and Ecology of Recent Ostracoda (ed. J.W. Neale). Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh, pp. 136-153. Global Name Index. 2010. http://gni.globalnames.org/data.
  7. Griffiths, H.I. 2001. Ostracod evolution and extinction - its biostratigraphic value in the European Quaternary. Quaternary. Sci Rev. 20: 1743-1751.
  8. Gülen, D. 1985. Bisexual Ostracoda (Crustacea) populations in Anatolia, İstanbul Üniversity Fen Fak. Biyoloji Mecmuası (Seri B). 50: 81-86.
  9. Horne, D.J., Baltanás A. and Paris, G. 1998. Geographical distribution of reproductive modes in living non-marine ostracods. In: Sex and Parthenogenesis. Evolutionary Ecology of Reproductive Modes in Non-Marine Ostracods (ed. K. Martens), Backhuys, Leiden, pp. 77-99.
  10. Jan, N., Stauffer, S. and Moseley, L. 2000. A hypothesis for the evolution of sex. Theor Biosci. 119: 166-168.
  11. Janz, H. 1994. Zur Bedeutung des Schalenmerkmals ‘Marginalrippen’ der Gattung Ilyocypris (Ostracoda, Crustacea), Stuttg. Beitr. Naturk., Serie B. 206: 1-19.
  12. Karanovic, I. 1999. On Pseudocypridopsis n.gen., with a redescription of Pseudocypridopsis clathrata (Klie, 1936) and a first description of the male (Ostracoda, Cypridopsinae). Bull. Zool. Mus. Univ. Amsterdam. 17: 1-7.
  13. Kempf, E.K. 1980. Index and bibliography of Nonmarine Ostracoda 1. Index A. Geologisches Institut der Universität zu Köln, Sonderveroeff entlichungen 35: 1-188.
  14. Kempf, E.K. 1997. Index and bibliography