✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
Koch, 1843) were new for the Iranian spider fauna.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Te spider fauna of Iran is poorly known, particularly in the eastern parts of Iran, where there are still several areas that arenot well known.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As a result of the study of spider fauna in organic and conventional wheat felds of Khorasan-e-Razavi Province during2011 2012, a total of 10 families, 18 genera, and 19 species were recorded.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Koch, 1843) were new for the Iranian spider fauna.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters
Abstract
Te spider fauna of Iran is poorly known, particularly in the eastern parts of Iran, where there are still several areas that arenot well known. As a result of the study of spider fauna in organic and conventional wheat felds of Khorasan-e-Razavi Province during2011 2012, a total of 10 families, 18 genera, and 19 species were recorded. Among the specimens, Gnaphosa lucifuga (Walckenaer, 1802)and Uroctea limbata (C.L. Koch, 1843) were new for the Iranian spider fauna.
🔖
Cite This Article
HOSSEINI, M., MIRSHAMSI, O., KASHEFI, R., FEKRAT, L. (2022). A contribution to the knowledge of spiders in wheat felds of Khorasan-e-Razavi Province, Iran. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 4, 437–443. https://ajindex.com/articles/616394