Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Population size of endemic Rana tavasensis in its terra typica, Turkey

Pages
729–733
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This trend provides us with useful knowledge for conservation and management activities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:We applied capture mark recapture (CMR) methods to estimate the population size of the Tavas frog Rana tavasensis in its terra typica.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, we used Pollock s robust design in program MARK in the 2011 2015 breeding seasons in its terra typica.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This trend provides us with useful knowledge for conservation and management activities.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

We applied capture mark recapture (CMR) methods to estimate the population size of the Tavas frog Rana tavasensis in its terra typica. For this purpose, we used Pollock s robust design in program MARK in the 2011 2015 breeding seasons in its terra typica. Based on the selected model, equal catchability of each individual and absence of temporary migration were found to be the most likely biological hypotheses. Population sizes were estimated as 398, 348, 275, and 117 individuals during the four study years, respectively. Annual capture probabilities were estimated to average 0.07, and annual survival rates across years averaged 0.19. The year-specific estimations showed a remarkable decline in population size and survival rates. Anthropogenic factors, such as off-road activities, recreational activities, and animal grazing, might have played a role in this decline. This trend provides us with useful knowledge for conservation and management activities.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAŞKALE, E., ÇAPAR, D. (2022). Population size of endemic Rana tavasensis in its terra typica, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 729–733. https://ajindex.com/articles/616361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Alford RA, Richards SJ (1999). Global amphibian declines: a problem in applied Ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 30: 133-165.
  2. AmphibiaWeb (2016). Information on amphibian biology and conservation. [online]. Website http://amphibiaweb.org/ (accessed 24 February 2016).
  3. Araujo MB, Thuiller W, Pearson RG (2006). Climate warming and the decline of amphibians and reptiles in Europe. J Biogeogr 33: 1712-1728.
  4. Ayaz D, Tok CV, Mermer A, Tosunoğlu M, Afsar M, Çiçek K (2007). Population size of the Marsh frog (Rana ridibunda Pallas, 1771) in Lake Yayla (Denizli, Turkey). Turk J Zool 31: 255-260.
  5. Baran I, Balık S, Kumlutaş Y, Tok CV, Olgun K, Durmuş H, Türkozan O, Ilgaz Ç, Iret F (2001). Rana holtzi (Toros Kurbağası)’nin biyolojik ve ekolojik yönden araştırılması ve koruma stratejisinin saptanması. IV Ulusal Ekoloji ve Çevre Kongresi; 8–9 February 2013;
  6. Ankara,
  7. Turkey. Ankara, Turkey: Hacettepe University, pp. 213-218 (in Turkish). Barinaga M (1990). Where have all the froggies gone? Science 247: 1033-1034.
  8. Başkale E, Kaya U (2012).
  9. Decline of the Levantine Frog, Pelophylax bedriagae Camerano, 1882, in the western Aegean Region of Turkey: changes in population size and implications for conservation. Zool Middle East 57: 69-76.
  10. Başkale E, Yıldırım E, Çevik İE, Kaya U (2013). Population size and age structure of metamorphic and pedomorphic forms of Ommatotriton ophryticus (Berthold, 1846) in Northwestern Black Sea Region of Turkey. J Herpetol 47: 270-276.
  11. Beebee TJC (2013). Effects of road mortality and mitigation measures on amphibian populations. Conserv Biol 27: 657-668.
  12. Blaustein AR, Wake DB (1990). Declining amphibian populations: a global phenomenon. Trends Ecol Evol 5: 203-204.
  13. Bowkett AE (2009). Recent captive-breeding proposals and the return of the ark concept to global species conservation. Conserv Biol 23: 773-776.
  14. Burnham KP, Anderson DR(2002). Model Selection and Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. 1st ed. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag. Çevik İE, Başkale E, Kaya U (2008). A mark-recapture study of the fire-bellied toad (Bombina bombina) using digital photographic identification techniques in north-western Turkey. Acta Biol Univ Daugavp 8: 75-79.
  15. Çiçek K, Mermer A, Tok CV (2011) Population dynamics of Rana macrocnemis Boulenger, 1885 at Uludağ, Western Turkey. Zool Middle East 53: 41-60.
  16. Collins JP, Storfer A (2003). Global amphibian declines: sorting the hypotheses. Divers Distrib 9: 89-98.
  17. Cooch E, White GC(2015). Program Mark, a gentle in