Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2016 / Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5

Coexistence of Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus andGreat Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in nonforest treestands of the agricultural landscape in SE Poland

Pages
743–748
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The increase in the number of Great Spotted Woodpecker breeding territories in the nonforest tree stands of the study area probably resulted from their recolonization of this habitat, enabled by the decrease of the Syrian Woodpecker population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The number and habitat preferences of Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus and Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major was assessed in 2004 2015 in a 305 km2 area of SE Poland.
📊
Key Findings & Data:An assessment of the number of breeding pairs of these sympatric species was carried out in the nonforest tree stands of the agricultural landscape, which consisted of a total area of 41.7 km2.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The increase in the number of Great Spotted Woodpecker breeding territories in the nonforest tree stands of the study area probably resulted from their recolonization of this habitat, enabled by the decrease of the Syrian Woodpecker population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The number and habitat preferences of Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus and Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major was assessed in 2004 2015 in a 305 km2 area of SE Poland. An assessment of the number of breeding pairs of these sympatric species was carried out in the nonforest tree stands of the agricultural landscape, which consisted of a total area of 41.7 km2. A significant decrease in the density of Syrian Woodpeckers was noted, from 12.2 to 3.8 (down to 31%) breeding pairs/10 km2 nonforest tree stands, whereas the density of Great Spotted Woodpeckers increased from 0.7 to 1.7 (ca. 140%) breeding pairs/10 km2 nonforest tree stands. Syrian Woodpeckers mainly inhabited afforestations located outside of parks (91%, N = 99), whereas Great Spotted Woodpeckers were much more likely to inhabit territories within parks (47%, N = 15). The frequency with which Great Spotted Woodpeckers inhabited parks increased as the density of Syrian Woodpeckers decreased in the study area and as the area of tree cover increased within parks. The increase in the number of Great Spotted Woodpecker breeding territories in the nonforest tree stands of the study area probably resulted from their recolonization of this habitat, enabled by the decrease of the Syrian Woodpecker population.

🔖

Cite This Article

MICHALCZUK, J., MICHALCZUK, M. (2022). Coexistence of Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus andGreat Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major in nonforest treestands of the agricultural landscape in SE Poland. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 40 - Sayı: 5, 743–748. https://ajindex.com/articles/616338

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Aghanajafizadeh A, Heydari F, Naderi G, Hemami MR (2011). Nesting hole site selection by the Syrian Woodpecker, Dendrocopos syriacus, in Yazad province, Iran. Zool Middle East 53: 3-6.
  2. Al-Safadi MM (2004). On the breeding biology of the Syrian Woodpecker, Dendrocopos syriacus, in the Gaza Strip. Zool Middle East 32: 7-12. Biaduń W (2001). Expansion of Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in Lublin. In: Indykiewicz P, Barczak T, Kaczorowski G, editors. Bioróżnorodność i Ekologia Populacji Zwierzęcych w Środowiskach Zurbanizowanych. Bydgoszcz, Poland: NICE, pp. 232-235 (in Polish with abstract in English). Cramp S (1985). The Birds of the Western Palearctic. IV. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  3. Elton CS (1967). The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.
  4. Flade M (1997). Dendrocopos major Great Spotted Woodpecker. In: Hagemeijer WJM, Blair MJ, editors. The EBCC Atlas of European Breeding Birds: Their Distribution and Abundance. London, UK: Academic Press, pp. 448-449.
  5. Fröhlich A, Ciach M (2013). Distribution and abundance of the Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in Kraków. Ornis Pol 54:237-246 (in Polish with abstract in English). Głowaciński Z (2011). Introduction and mechanisms favoring alien animal invasions. In: Głowaciński Z, Okarma H, Pawłowski J, Solarz W, editors. Alien Species in the Polish Fauna. Kraków, Poland: Wyd. IOP PAN, pp. 653-670 (in Polish with abstract in English). Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer K (1980). Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. IX. Wiesbaden, Germany: Akademische Verlag (in German). Hebda G (2009). Nesting sites of the Great Spotted Woodpecker Dendrocopos major L. in Poland: analysis of nest cards. Pol J Ecol 57: 149-158.
  6. Kondracki J (2000).
  7. Geografia Regionalna Polski. Warsaw, Poland: Wyd. Nauk. PWN (in Polish). Kurek H (1984). Syrian Woodpecker in the San Valley. Not Ornit 25: 65-68 (in Polish with abstract in English). Marisova IV, Butenko AG (1976). Data on distribution and ecology of Syrian Woodpecker Dendrocopos syriacus in the Ukraine. Vest Zool 2: 29-34 (in Russian with abstract in English). Mazgajski TD, Rejt Ł (2006). The effect of forest patch size on the breeding biology of the great spotted woodpecker Dendrocopos major. Ann Zool Fennici 43: 211-220.
  8. Mendelssohn H, Yom-Tov Y (1999). A report of birds and mammals which have increased their distribution and abundance in Israel due to human activity. Isr J Zool 45: 35-47.
  9. Michalczuk J (2014). Expansion of the