Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1

Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera assemblages of karst springs in relationto some environmental factors: a case study in central Bosnia and Herzegovina

Pages
119–129
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results indicate that piped springs significantly differed in EPT taxa distribution and diversity and imply that anthropogenic activities (capturing) would change natural conditions with a decrease in EPT index.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study we analyzed changes of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) assemblages in 50 springs along the Cvrcka River mainstream in central Bosnia and Herzegovina.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Springs were divided into 3 groups: rheocrene, rheopsammocrene, and piped springs.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results indicate that piped springs significantly differed in EPT taxa distribution and diversity and imply that anthropogenic activities (capturing) would change natural conditions with a decrease in EPT index.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study we analyzed changes of Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera (EPT) assemblages in 50 springs along the Cvrcka River mainstream in central Bosnia and Herzegovina. Springs were divided into 3 groups: rheocrene, rheopsammocrene, and piped springs. The objectives of our survey were to analyze changes in EPT communities in response to some environmental factors and anthropogenic activities. Twenty-eight morphologically distinct taxa were identified. EPT diversity was positively correlated to discharge and areal coverage of sand and stones but negatively correlated with areal coverage of algae. Canonical correspondence analysis revealed that the most important factors in structuring EPT spring assemblages were macrophytes, pH value, water temperature, and conductivity, while a significant influence of altitude for EPT species assemblages was not found. EPT assemblages in springs were dominated by collector-gatherers and shredders. Our results indicate that piped springs significantly differed in EPT taxa distribution and diversity and imply that anthropogenic activities (capturing) would change natural conditions with a decrease in EPT index. The studied springs presented high diversity and some of them constitute the habitat for rare or endemic species (e.g., Drusus crenophylax) of the Balkan Peninsula, giving a high conservation value to these habitats.

🔖

Cite This Article

DMITROVIC, D., PESIC, V., SAVIC, A. (2022). Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera assemblages of karst springs in relationto some environmental factors: a case study in central Bosnia and Herzegovina. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 1, 119–129. https://ajindex.com/articles/616276

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Armitage PD, Pardo I, Brown A (1995). Temporal constancy in ‘mesohabitats’-application to management. Arch Hydrobiol 133: 367-387.
  2. Barquin J, Death RG (2006). Spatial patterns of macroinvertebrate diversity in New Zealand springbrooks and rhithral streams. J North Am Benthological Soc 25: 768-786. Barquín J, Death RG (2009). Physical and chemical differences in karst springs of Cantabria, northern Spain: do invertebrate communities correspond? Aquat Ecol 43: 445-455.
  3. Bauernfeind E, Soldán T (2012). The Mayflies of Europe (Ephemeroptera). Ollerup, Denmark: Apollo Books.Belfiore C (1983). Guide per il riconoscimento delle specie animali delle acque interne Italiane. 24. Efemerotteri (Ephemeroptera). Verona, Italy: Consiglio Nazionale Delle Ricerche (in Italian). Blanchet FG, Legendre P, Borcard D (2008). Forward selection of explanatory variables. Ecology 89: 2623-2632.
  4. Boulton AJ (2005). Chances and challenges in the conservation of groundwaters and their dependent ecosystems. Aquat Conserv 15: 319-323.
  5. Bowden WB, Glime JM, Riis T (2007). Macroinvertebrates as biotic indicators of environmental quality. In: Hauer RF, Lamberty GA editors. Methods in Stream Ecology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier, pp. 805-834. Buczyński P, Czachorowski S, Moroz S, Stryjecki R (2003).
  6. Odonata, Trichoptera, Coleoptera, and Hydrachnidia of springs in Kazimierski Landscape Park (Eastern Poland) and factors affecting the characters of these ecosystems. Suppl Acta Hydrobiol 5: 13-29.
  7. Dallas HF, Ketley ZA (2011). Upper thermal limits of aquatic macroinvertebrates: comparing critical thermal maxima with 96-LT50 values. J Therm Biol 36: 322-327.
  8. Dodds WK (2006). Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams. Limnol Oceanogr 51: 671-680.
  9. Erman NA, Erman DC (1990). Biogeography of Caddisfly (Trichoptera) Assemblages in Cold Springs of the Sierra Nevada (California, USA). California Water Resources. Center Contribution 200. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California. Erman NA, Erman DC (1995).
  10. Spring permanence, Trichoptera species richness and the role of drought. J Kans Entomol Soc 68: 50-64.
  11. Fischer J, Fischer F, Schnabel S, Bohle HW (1998). Spring fauna of the Hessian Mittelgebirge: Population structure, adaptive strategies, and relations to habitats of the macroinvertebrates, as exemplified by springs in the Rhenisch metamorphic shield and in the East-Hessian sandstone plate. In: Botosaneanu L editor. Studies in Crenobiology. The Biology of Springs and Spring