Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3

Diversity of zooplankton in municipal wastewater-contaminated urban pond ecosystems of the lower Gangetic plains

Pages
464–475
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ponds of varied sizes in almost every municipal area of the lower Gangetic plains stabilizeraw untreated domestic wastewater and encourage fish yield and the local economy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present limnological investigation was conducted to study zooplankton diversity in municipal wastewater-contaminatedponds in light of their contributions to the ecosystem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A good number of zooplankton species thrived in these ponds(22 species of zooplankton, including 14 species of Rotifera, 3 species of Copepoda, 4 species of Cladocera, and a single species ofOstracoda), which suggests that the municipal wastewater, loaded with various nutrients, has influenced the zooplankton diversity andabundance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ponds of varied sizes in almost every municipal area of the lower Gangetic plains stabilizeraw untreated domestic wastewater and encourage fish yield and the local economy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The present limnological investigation was conducted to study zooplankton diversity in municipal wastewater-contaminatedponds in light of their contributions to the ecosystem. It is revealed by the present study that the physicochemical factors of the studysites are regulated by wastewater input and anthropogenic activities. A good number of zooplankton species thrived in these ponds(22 species of zooplankton, including 14 species of Rotifera, 3 species of Copepoda, 4 species of Cladocera, and a single species ofOstracoda), which suggests that the municipal wastewater, loaded with various nutrients, has influenced the zooplankton diversity andabundance. Site 3, a well-managed fishpond, showed the highest Shannon Wiener diversity index value (2.303). Site 5, contaminatedwith organic waste matter from adjacent cattle sheds, showed the highest zooplankton abundance (1609.63 ind. L1 ) and maximumdominance (0.472). Site-wise variations of diversity indices and statistical analyses support our findings. These ponds, although facedwith serious threats of extinction by unscientific and unplanned urbanization policies, could very well be recognized as natural effluenttreatment units within the municipal areas. Ponds of varied sizes in almost every municipal area of the lower Gangetic plains stabilizeraw untreated domestic wastewater and encourage fish yield and the local economy.

🔖

Cite This Article

ADHIKARI, S., MUKHOPADHYAY, S. K., GOSWAMI, A. R. (2022). Diversity of zooplankton in municipal wastewater-contaminated urban pond ecosystems of the lower Gangetic plains. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 3, 464–475. https://ajindex.com/articles/616254

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ahlstorm EH (1940). A revision of the rotatorian genera Brachionus and Platyias with descriptions of one new species and two new varieties. B Am Mus Nat Hist 77: 143-184.
  2. Apaydın Yağcı M, Yağcı M, Dölcü B (2016). Relationships between the physicochemical parameters and zooplankton in Eğirdir Lake (Turkey). Iran J Fish Sci 15: 118-132.
  3. Battish SK (1992). Freshwater Zooplankton of India. Delhi, India: Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd. Bera A, Dutta TK, Patra, BC, Sar UK (2014). Correlation study on zooplankton availability and physicochemical factors of Kangsabati Reservoir, West Bengal, India. International Research Journal of Environment Sciences 3: 28-32.
  4. Bhanja D, Ghosh J, Basu A, Kundu G, Ghosh P, Roy S (2014). Dynamics of plankton community in two adjacent unmanaged ponds of West Bengal, India. Biosc Dis 5: 241-247.
  5. Das D, Pal S, Keshri JP (2015). Environmental determinants of phytoplankton assemblages of a lentic water body of Burdwan, West Bengal, India. International Journal of Current Research and Review 7: 1-7.
  6. De Sarkar P, Naaz S, Mukhopadhyay SK (2004). Diel activity patterns within zooplanktonic community in relation to physico- chemical factors. Journal of Environment and Sociobiology 1: 1-12.
  7. Dutta NC, Das MC, Bandopadhyay SB (1982). Diurnal rhythm of some physicochemical properties and zooplankton in a typical freshwater pond in Calcutta, West Bengal, India. Indian J Physic Nat Sci 2: 22-27.
  8. Dutta T (2011). Zooplankton diversity and physico-chemical conditions of two wetlands of Jalpaiguri district, India. International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology 2: 576-583.
  9. Dutta TK, Patra, BC (2013). Biodiversity and seasonal abundance of Zooplankton and its relation to physico–chemical parameters of Jamunabundh, Bishnupur, India. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications 3: 76-82.
  10. Edmondson WT, Ward HB, Whipple GC (1992). Freshwater Biology. 2nd ed. New Delhi, India: International Books & Periodicals Supply Service. Ejsmont-Karabin J (2013). An analysis based on rotifer indices of the effects of water and sewage management on water quality in the system of interconnected glacial lakes. Limnol Review 4: 191-195.
  11. Elton CS, Miller RS (1954). The ecological survey of classifying habitats by structural characters. J Ecol 42: 460-496.
  12. Ganesan L, Khan RA (2008). Studies on the ecology of Zooplankton in a Floodplain of West Bengal, India. Proceedings of Taal 2007: The 12th World Lake Conference; 28 October–2