Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5

High genetic distinctiveness of wild and farm fox ( Vulpes vulpes L.) populations in Poland: evidence from mitochondrial DNA analysis

Pages
783–790
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the pairwise Φ STvalues make it clear that North Americanwild and Polish wild foxes are genetically distinct evolutionary groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In Poland, the number of wild red foxes ( Vulpes vulpesL.) and the size of the fur-farming industry are growing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Thereis concern that the gene pool of the wild foxes is being infiltrated by that of the farm animals.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the pairwise Φ STvalues make it clear that North Americanwild and Polish wild foxes are genetically distinct evolutionary groups.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In Poland, the number of wild red foxes ( Vulpes vulpesL.) and the size of the fur-farming industry are growing. Thereis concern that the gene pool of the wild foxes is being infiltrated by that of the farm animals. We analyzed three groups Polishfarm foxes and wild-living animals from Poland and North America to investigate the gene flow or introgression between farm andwild red foxes. We took into account the breeding history of the species and the evolutionary relationships between fox populationson different continents. We compared the haplotypes based on the concatenated nucleotide sequences ofMT-CO1(mitochondriallyencoded cytochrome c oxidase I) andMT-ATP6(mitochondrially encoded ATP synthase 6) genes. It was confirmed that investigatedfur-farm animals originated from wild individuals living in North America. We found a haplotype common to wild foxes from Europe(Poland) and wild North American individuals. The common haplotype shared by both investigated wild-living groups could indicatesome degree of introgression between Polish farm and wild-living populations. Haplotypes characteristic of North American foxes weretransferred to the Polish wild population and have been established. However, the pairwise Φ STvalues make it clear that North Americanwild and Polish wild foxes are genetically distinct evolutionary groups.

🔖

Cite This Article

GRYZINSKA, M., HORECKA, B., KASPEREK, K., JEZEWSKA-WITKOWSKA, G., SLASKA, B., ROZEMPOLSKA-RUCINSKA, I., JAKUBCZAK, A. (2022). High genetic distinctiveness of wild and farm fox ( Vulpes vulpes L.) populations in Poland: evidence from mitochondrial DNA analysis. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 5, 783–790. https://ajindex.com/articles/616252

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Aubry KB, Statham MJ, Sacks BN, Perrine JD, Wisely SM (2009). Phylogeography of the North American red fox: vicariance in Pleistocene forest refugia. Mol Ecol 18: 2668-2686.
  2. Balcom A (1916). Fox farming in Prince Edward Island: a chapter in the history of speculation. Q J Econ 30: 665-681.
  3. Berteaux D, Gallant D, Sacks BN, Statham MJ (2015). Red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ) at their expanding front in the Canadian Arctic have indigenous maternal ancestry. Polar Biol 38: 913-917.
  4. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000). TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9: 1657-1659.
  5. Edwards CJ, Soulsbury CD, Statham MJ, Ho SYW, Wall D, Dolf G, Iossa G, Baker PJ, Harris S, Sacks BN et al. (2012). Temporal genetic variation of the red fox, Vulpes vulpes, across western Europe and the British Isles. Quaternary Sci Rev 57: 95-104.
  6. Excoffier L, Lischer HEL (2010). Arlequin suite ver 3.5: A new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour 10: 564-567.
  7. Galov A, Sindičić M, Andreanszkyc T, Čurković S, Dězđek D, Slavica A, Hartl GB, Krueger B (2014). High genetic diversity and low population structure in red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes ) from Croatia. Mamm Biol 79: 77-80.
  8. Huson DH, Bryant D (2006). Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol 23: 254-267.
  9. İbiş O, Tez C, Özcan S (2014). Phylogenetic status of the Turkish red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ), based on partial sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene. Vertebr Zool 64: 273-284.
  10. Inoue T, Nonaka N, Mizuno A, Morishima Y, Sato H, Katakura K, Oku Y (2007). Mitochondrial DNA phylogeography of the red fox ( Vulpes vulpes ) in northern Japan. Zool Sci 24: 1178-1186. Jeżewska-Witkowska G, Horecka B, Jakubczak A, Kasperek K, Ślaska B, Bugno-Poniewierska M, Piórkowska M (2012). Genetic variability of farmed and free-living populations of red foxes (Vulpes vulpes ). Ann Anim Sci 12: 501-512.
  11. Kamler JF, Ballard WB (2002). A review of native and nonnative red foxes in North America. Wildl Soc Bull 30: 370-379.
  12. Kutschera VE, Lecomte N, Janke A, Selva N, Sokolov AA, Haun T, Steyer K, Nowak C, Hailer F (2013). A range-wide synthesis and timeline for phylogeographic events in the red fox ( Vu lp es vulpes ). BMC Evol Biol 13: 114. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13- 114. Langille BL, O’Leary KE, Whitney HG, Marshall HD (2014). Mitochondrial DNA diversity and phylogeography of insular Newfoundland red foxes ( Vulpes vulpes deletrix ). J Mammal 95