SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Cooperative Learning Methods on Pre Service Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Academic Achievement and Retention in the Subject of Analytical Examination of the Circle

Murat Dirlikli
Levent Akgün
Pages
427–440
Publication Date
2017-10-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also seen that STAD is more effective on academic achievement and LT is more effective on retention.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Öz The aim of this study is to determine the effects of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) and Learning Together (LT) methods of cooperative learning model and the conventional methods on academic achievement and retention of the knowledge leraned in the subject of Analytic Examination of the Circle of candidates of primary school mathematics teaching.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sampling of the study is formed by the 76 students in normal and evening education groups of 3rd grade in primary school mathematics teaching department at a state university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also seen that STAD is more effective on academic achievement and LT is more effective on retention.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anahtar Kelimeler Cooperative Learning Methods · Student Teams Achievement Divisions Methods · Learning Together Methods

Özet

Öz The aim of this study is to determine the effects of Student Teams Achievement Divisions (STAD) and Learning Together (LT) methods of cooperative learning model and the conventional methods on academic achievement and retention of the knowledge leraned in the subject of Analytic Examination of the Circle of candidates of primary school mathematics teaching. Quantitative research methods are used in and this study is designed according quasi-experimental to pre-test, post-test design with control group. The sampling of the study is formed by the 76 students in normal and evening education groups of 3rd grade in primary school mathematics teaching department at a state university. The achievement test formed by the researcher, module tests are used as data collection tools in the study. The study is held with 2 experimental and 1 control groups in tottally three classes. STAD method is used in the first group, LT is used in the second group, and the conevtional methods are used in the third group. Descripitve statistics, one way variance analyses (ANOVA) and LSD multiple comparison tests are used in the analyses of quantitative data. Consequently, it is seen that STAD and LT methods are more effective on academic achievement of the students and the retention of the knowledge. It is also seen that STAD is more effective on academic achievement and LT is more effective on retention.

🔖

Cite This Article

Dirlikli, M., Akgün, L. (2017). The Effect of Cooperative Learning Methods on Pre Service Elementary Mathematics Teachers' Academic Achievement and Retention in the Subject of Analytical Examination of the Circle. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 46 - Sayı: 2, 427–440. https://ajindex.com/articles/6162

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Akar, M. S. (2012). Informing of Science and Technology Teachers About Cooperative Learning Model, Applications of This Model in The Class and Evaluating The Obtained Results: (Kars Sample). PhD Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum. Akbuga, S. (2009). The Effect of Group Activities Structuredaccording to Cooperative Learning Principles on Students’level at The Beginning and at the End and Attitudes in 4th Grade Mathematics Lesson in Primary School. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir. Akpınar, B. and Gezer, B. (2010). Learner-Centered New Educational Paradigms and Their Reflections on The Period of Learning and Teaching. Dicle University Journal of Ziya Gökalp Faculty of Education, 14, 1-12.
  2. Aksoy, G. (2011). Effects of Reading-Writing-Application and Learning Together Methods on Students’ Understanding of Laboratory Experiments in Science and Technology Course. Master's Thesis, Atatürk University, Erzurum. Arısoy, B. (2011). The Effects of Stad and Tgt Techniques of Cooperatıve Learning on Sixth Grade Students’ Academic Achievement, Retention and Social Skill Levels in “Statistic and Probability” Subject in Mathematics Lesson. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Cukurova University, Adana. Arslan, A. and Sahin, T. Y. (2004). The Effects of Cooperative Learning Based on Constructivist Learning on Students’ Affective Learning. XIII. National Educational Sciences Congress, Inonu University, Malatya. Avsar, Z. and Alkıs, S. (2007), The effect of cooperative learning “Jigsaw I” technique on student success in social studies course. Elementary Education Online (EEO), 6(2), 197-203.
  3. Bayrakceken, S. (2008). Test Geliştirme. Edt. E. Karip. Ölçme ve Değerlendirme, 244-277,
  4. Pegem A, Ankara.
  5. Basturk, R. (2009).
  6. Deneme Modelleri., A. Tanrıöğen. (Editör).Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara.
  7. Anı Yayıncılık, Ss.31. Bilgin, T. (2004). The Usage of Student Teams and Achievement Divisions and Technical Results of Application on Seventh Grade in Elementary Mathematics Course (Regarding polygons). Uludag University Faculty of Education Journal, 17(1): 19- 28. Bilgin, I. and Geban, O. (2004). Investigating The Effects of Cooperative Learning Strategy and Gender on Re-Service Elementary Teacher Students’ Attitude Toward Science and Achievement of Science Teaching Class I, Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 26, 9-18.
  8. Bozkurt, Y. (1999). The Effects of Various Assessment Methods for Measuring for Measuring Achievement in Cooperative Learning Group at Four