Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6

Mating behaviour and its relationship with morphological features in the millipede Pachyiulus hungaricus (Karsch, 1881) (Myriapoda, Diplopoda, Julida)

Pages
1010–1023
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

On the other hand, our results indicate that size and/orshape of the tested morphological traits, except for the shape of the male walking legs, were not subject to precopulatory sexual selection.Other sensory domains known to influence courtship behaviour need to be investigated in this regard inP. hungaricus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although millipedes (Diplopoda) represent one of the most diverse classes of arthropods, data concerning details of theirmating behaviour are very scarce.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We conducted 3 types of behaviouraltests: a mating arena test, a female choice test, and a male choice test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:On the other hand, our results indicate that size and/orshape of the tested morphological traits, except for the shape of the male walking legs, were not subject to precopulatory sexual selection.Other sensory domains known to influence courtship behaviour need to be investigated in this regard inP. hungaricus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although millipedes (Diplopoda) represent one of the most diverse classes of arthropods, data concerning details of theirmating behaviour are very scarce. In this work, we explored mating behaviour of the European millipedePachyiulus hungaricusunderlaboratory conditions, and its relationship with the size and shape of certain morphological traits. We conducted 3 types of behaviouraltests: a mating arena test, a female choice test, and a male choice test. Premating behaviour wassequencedin 5 behavioural stepsand, together with the duration of copulation, scored in all mating assays. Males were the more active sex in searching for mates, whilefemales were the choosier sex. Furthermore, in the choice tests, previous mating partners had significantly more copulations than newones, thus raising questions about postcopulatory sexual selection in this species. On the other hand, our results indicate that size and/orshape of the tested morphological traits, except for the shape of the male walking legs, were not subject to precopulatory sexual selection.Other sensory domains known to influence courtship behaviour need to be investigated in this regard inP. hungaricus.

🔖

Cite This Article

JOVANOVIC, Z., PAVKOVIC-LUCIC, S., ILIC, B., VUJIC, V., DUDIC, B., MAKAROV, S., LUCIC, L., TOMIC, V. (2022). Mating behaviour and its relationship with morphological features in the millipede Pachyiulus hungaricus (Karsch, 1881) (Myriapoda, Diplopoda, Julida). Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 6, 1010–1023. https://ajindex.com/articles/616187

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ (2004). Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 36-42.
  2. Adolph SC, Geber MA (1995). Mate guarding, mating success and body size in the tropical millipede Nyssodesmus python (Peters) (Polydesmida: Platyrhacidae). Southwest Nat 40: 56-61. Andrés JA, Cordero Rivera A (2000). Copulation duration and fertilization success in a damselfly: an example of cryptic female choice? Anim Behav 59: 695-703.
  3. Arnqvist G, Rowe L (1995). Sexual conflict and arms races between the sexes: a morphological adaptation for control of mating in a female insect. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 261: 123-127.
  4. Arnqvist G, Danielsson I (1999a). Postmating sexual selection: the effects of male body size and recovery period on paternity and egg production rate in a water strider. Behav Ecol 10: 358-365.
  5. Arnqvist G, Danielsson I (1999b). Copulatory behavior, genital morphology, and male fertilization success in water striders. Evolution 53: 147-156.
  6. Barnett M, Telford SR, De Villiers CJ (1993). Sperm displacement in a millipede? An investigation into the genital morphology of the southern African spirostreptid millipede Orthoporus pyrhocephalus. J Zool 231: 511-522.
  7. Baena ML, Macías-Ordó ñ ez R (2015). Mobility and mating frequency in the scramble competition polygyny of a chrysomelid beetle. Behav Ecol 26: 416-424.
  8. Barnett M, Telford SR (1994). The timing of insemination and its implications for sperm competition in a millipede with prolonged copulation. Anim Behav 48: 482-484.
  9. Barnett M, Telford SR, Tibbies BJ (1995). Female mediation of sperm competition in the millipede Alloporus uncinatus (Diplopoda: Spirostreptidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 413-419.
  10. Blower JG (1985). Millipedes. In: Kermack DM, Barnes RSK, editors. Linnean Society Synopses of the British Fauna (New Series), No 35. London, UK: E. J. Brill/Dr. W. Backhuys. Burns M (2005). The role of size and defensive compounds in mate choice by Nyssodesmus python (Polydesmida: Platyrhacidae). Report. Tampa, FL, USA: University of South Florida. http:// digital.lib.usf.edu/SFS0001374/00001. Carey CJ, Bull CM (1986). Recognition of mates in the Portuguese millipede Ommatoiulus moreletii. Austr J Zool 34: 837-842.
  11. Cator LJ, Zanti Z (2016). Size, sounds and sex: interactions between body size and harmonic convergence signals determine mating success in Aedes aegypti. Parasite Vectors. doi: 10.1186/s13071- 016-1914-6.
  12. Cooper MI, Telford SR (2000). Copulatory sequences and sexual struggle