Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2017 / Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2

Can montane and cave centipedes inhabit soil?

Pages
375–378
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study shows that soil can be inhabited by cave centipedesor centipedes with montane distribution.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Communities of centipedes (Chilopoda) were studied at three localities in eastern Bohemia (Czech Republic) near the townof Skuteč using modified subterranean traps.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Centipedes were trapped separately from depths of 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and95 cm to allow evaluation of the vertical distribution in the soil.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study shows that soil can be inhabited by cave centipedesor centipedes with montane distribution.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Communities of centipedes (Chilopoda) were studied at three localities in eastern Bohemia (Czech Republic) near the townof Skuteč using modified subterranean traps. Centipedes were trapped separately from depths of 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75, 85, and95 cm to allow evaluation of the vertical distribution in the soil. Presence of centipedes in deeper soil profiles is related to their abilityto colonize the subterranean environment.Lithobius tenebrosus fennoscandius ,L. lucifugus ,L. macilentus ,Cryptops parisi ,Strigamiaacuminata , andS. transsilvanicainhabited deeper soil layers preferentially. This study shows that soil can be inhabited by cave centipedesor centipedes with montane distribution.

🔖

Cite This Article

MIKULA, J., TUF, I. H., KOPECKY, O. (2022). Can montane and cave centipedes inhabit soil?. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 41 - Sayı: 2, 375–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/616185

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Andersson G (2006). Habitat preferences and seasonal distribution of developmental stadia in Lamyctes emarginatus (Newport, 1844) ( L. fulvicornis Meinert, 1868) and comparisons with some Lithobius species. Norw J Entomol 53: 311-320. Biteniekytė M, Rėlys V (2006). Investigation of activity and vertical distribution of spiders in Sphagnum tussocks of peat bogs. Biologija 2006: 77-82.
  2. Christiansen K (1992). Biological processes in space and time. Cave life in the light of modern evolutionary theory. In: Camacho AI, editor. The Natural History of Biospeleology. Madrid, Spain: Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, pp. 453-478.
  3. Culver DC, Pipan T (2009). Superficial subterranean habitats – gateway to the subterranean realm? Cave Karst Sci 35: 5-12.
  4. Deltshev C, Lazarov S, Naumova M, Stoev P (2011). A survey of spiders (Araneae) inhabiting the euedaphic soil stratum and the superficial underground compartment in Bulgaria. Arachnol Mitt 40: 33-46. Dvořák L, Dvořáková K (2015). Some invertebrates found in underground shelters of the Dyleňský Kras karst. In: Bartoš J, Dvořák L, editors. Dyleňský Kras. Mariánské Lázně, Czech Republic: Městské Muzeum ML, pp. 145–156 (in Czech with English abstract). Folkmanová B (1951). About some Chilopods new for Morava. Sborn Kl Přír Brno 29: 98-104 (in Czech). Gulička J (1985). Soil and cave macrofauna of karst mountains of Western Carpathians (1). Slovenský kras 23: 89-129 (in Slovak). Ilie V (2003). Chilopoda species from the edaphic and subterranean environments of the Cloşani karstic area (Romania). Trav Mus Nat Hist Nat “Grigore Antipa” 45: 129-137.
  5. Ilie V (2004). Data on the Chilopoda species from the western Bihor Mountains (Romania). Trav Mus Nat Hist Nat “Grigore Antipa” 46: 67-73.
  6. Ilie V, Negrea S, Mitič B (2003). The diversity of the Chilopoda species from the karstic area of the Anina mountains (Banat, Romania). Arch Biol Sci Belgrade 55: 93-99. Laška V, Kopecký O, Růžička V, Mikula J, Véle A, Šarapatka B, Tuf IH (2011). Vertical distribution of spiders in soil. J Arachnol 39: 393-398. López H, Oromí P (2010). A pitfall trap for sampling the mesovoid shallow substratum (MSS) fauna. Speleobiology Notes 2: 7-11.
  7. Minelli A, Chagas A Jr, Edgecombe GD (2009). Saltational evolution of trunk segment number in centipedes. Evol Dev 11: 318-322.
  8. Nitzu E, Giurginca A, Ilie V, Vặnoaica L (1999). First note on the edaphic and subterranean fauna from the evaporitic karstic regions of Romania. Trav Inst Speol Emil Racovita 37-38: 14