Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

The orientation of earthworms is influenced by magnetic fields

Pages
199–208
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The orientations ofthe earthworms in the control (261.4° ± 101.6°) and experimental (251.2° ± 94.1°) groups were statistically different (P < 0.005), and adeviation of approximately 10° to the east was observed for the experimental group in comparison to the control group.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Earth has a natural magnetic field that many animals use for orientation and navigation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The 3 experimental groups, each composed of 20 earthworms, were exposed to190–520 μT magnetic fields using a 1.5 V current for 1-h durations in a wire-wrapped vivarium.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The orientations ofthe earthworms in the control (261.4° ± 101.6°) and experimental (251.2° ± 94.1°) groups were statistically different (P < 0.005), and adeviation of approximately 10° to the east was observed for the experimental group in comparison to the control group.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Earth has a natural magnetic field that many animals use for orientation and navigation. With the development of technology,these natural systems have been exposed to high levels of man-made electromagnetism from the heavy usage of electric devices. Thisstudy aims to understand the possible effects of artificial magnetic fields on the behavioral responses of the earthworm, which is used inthis study as a model organism in laboratory conditions. The 3 experimental groups, each composed of 20 earthworms, were exposed to190–520 μT magnetic fields using a 1.5 V current for 1-h durations in a wire-wrapped vivarium. The experimental and control groupswere kept in similar conditions. A camera recorded the positions of the earthworms every 5 min. The angles, in terms of the mean vectorof each earthworm’s position beginning in the center of the vivarium, were documented using the Adobe Photoshop CS6 program. Themean vectors and angles of different experimental designs and controls were compared using circular statistics. The orientations ofthe earthworms in the control (261.4° ± 101.6°) and experimental (251.2° ± 94.1°) groups were statistically different (P < 0.005), and adeviation of approximately 10° to the east was observed for the experimental group in comparison to the control group.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZDİLEK, Ş. Y., YALÇIN, F. S., ALTAŞ, R. (2022). The orientation of earthworms is influenced by magnetic fields. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 199–208. https://ajindex.com/articles/616144

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Aladjadjiyan A, Ylieva T (2003). Influence of stationary magnetic field on the early stages of the development of tobacco seeds (Nicotiana tabacum L.). Journal of Central European Agriculture 4: 131-138.
  2. Banks AN, Srygley RB (2003). Orientation by magnetic field in leaf-cutter ants, Atta colombica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Ethology 109(10): 835-846. doi: 10.1046/j.0179- 1613.2003.00927.x Bastardie F, Capowiez Y, De Dreuzy JR, Cluzeau D (2003). X-ray tomographic and hydraulic characterization of burrowing by three earthworm species in repacked soil cores. Applied Soil Ecology 24(1): 3-16. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(03)00071-4
  3. Bennett MF, Huguenin J (1969). Geomagnetic effects on a circadian difference in reaction times in earthworms. Zeitschrift Für Vergleichende Physiologie 63(4): 440-445. doi: 10.1007/ BF00339683 Bochert R, Zettler ML (2006). Effect of electromagnetic fields on marine organisms geomagnetic field detection in marine organisms. In: Köller J, Köppel J, Peters W (editors.). Offshore Wind Energy: Research on Environmental Impacts. New York: Springer, pp. 223-234. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-34677-7_14 Budán F, Kovács N, Engelmann P, Horváth I, Veres DS et al. (2014). Longitudinal in vivo MR imaging of live earthworms. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part A: Ecological Genetics and Physiology 321(9): 479-489. doi: 10.1002/jez.1880 Cannavacciuolo M, Bellido A, Cluzeau D, Gascuel C, Trehen P (1998). A geostatistical approach to the study of earthworm distribution in grassland. Applied Soil Ecology 9(1-3): 345- 349. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(98)00087-0 Decaëns T, Rossi JP (2008). Spatio-temporal structure of earthworm community and soil heterogeneity in a tropical pasture. Ecography 24(6): 671-682. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2001. tb00529.x Ernst G, Felten D, Vohland M, Emmerling C (2009). Impact of ecologically different earthworm species on soil water characteristics. European Journal of Soil Biology 45(3): 207- 213. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2009.01.001 Giller KE, Beare MH, LavelleP, Izac AMN, Swift MJ (1997). Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function. Applied Soil Ecology 6: 3-16.
  4. Kirschvink JL (1982). Birds, bees and magnetism. Trends in Neurosciences 5: 160-167. doi: 10.1016/0166-2236(82)90090- X Kirschvink JL, Kirschvink AK (1991). Is geomagnetic sensitivity real ? Replication of the Walker–Bitterman magnetic conditioning experiment in honey bees. American Zoologist 31(1): 169-185.
  5. Lavelle P (1988). Earthworm activities an