Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6

Ecomorphological associations and abundance of birds across the agricultural landscape of Pothwar Plateau, Pakistan

Pages
700–708
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This appears to be because commonspecies feed on a set of resources that are common everywhere, whereas range-restricted species are found in areas with water—but evenin these areas, water is scarce.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Some species are exceptionally common in landscapes heavily impacted by humans, such as agricultural lands.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This studywas carried out over a period of 2 years (July 2012 to June 2014) in the arid agricultural landscape of Pothwar Plateau, Pakistan, toidentify adaptations that govern bird distribution and abundance across 2 different cropping systems associated with differences inwater availability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This appears to be because commonspecies feed on a set of resources that are common everywhere, whereas range-restricted species are found in areas with water—but evenin these areas, water is scarce.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Some species are exceptionally common in landscapes heavily impacted by humans, such as agricultural lands. This studywas carried out over a period of 2 years (July 2012 to June 2014) in the arid agricultural landscape of Pothwar Plateau, Pakistan, toidentify adaptations that govern bird distribution and abundance across 2 different cropping systems associated with differences inwater availability. We used regular surveys and foraging observations to quantify species abundance, distribution, and habits. We thenexamined morphological correlations with ecological attributes. We found the following: (1) larger birds tended to spend more time intrees; (2) birds with small beaks and relatively long wings more commonly forage on the ground; (3) birds with narrow and long beaksand long tarsi were more likely to be insectivorous in habits. Of these associations, only the third axis, bill stubbiness and short tarsus,correlated with feeding on crops, implying that feeding on plant material is one preadaptation to crop exploitation. Bird abundancewas not correlated with feeding on crops. This is because some common species are crop exploiters, but other common species feed onsecondary growth (e.g., bulbuls, Pycnonotus spp.) or may be common in this region even in the absence of humans (e.g., the green beeeater, Merops orientalis). The best predictor of distribution was not crop-feeding but abundance. This appears to be because commonspecies feed on a set of resources that are common everywhere, whereas range-restricted species are found in areas with water—but evenin these areas, water is scarce.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUSSAIN, I., SARWAR, M. (2022). Ecomorphological associations and abundance of birds across the agricultural landscape of Pothwar Plateau, Pakistan. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 6, 700–708. https://ajindex.com/articles/616142

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Ali S (1943).
  2. The Book of Indian Birds. Bombay, India: Bombay Natural History Society. Ali N (2004). Population and human settlement characteristics of Potohar region of Punjab. PhD, University of Peshawar, Pakistan. Arif M, Malik MA (2009). Economic feasibility of proposed cropping patterns under different soil moisture regimes of Pothwar Plateau. Int J Agric Biol 11: 27-32.
  3. Barnett PR, Whittingham MR, Bradbury RB, and Wilson JD (2004). Use of unimproved and improved lowland grassland by wintering birds in the UK. Agr Ecosyst Environ 102: 49-60.
  4. Bates J (2011). Foraging behavior, partitioning and interactions of two island invasive birds: the Common Mynah (Acridotheres tristis) and the Red-Vented Bulbul (Pycnonotus cafer). UC Berkeley: UCB Moorea Class: Biology and Geomorphology of Tropical Islands. Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/ item/3h60v5m1. Benton TG, Vickery JA, and Wilson JD (2003). Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecol Evol 18: 182-188.
  5. Bhatt D, Kumar A (2001). Foraging ecology of Red-Vented Bulbul Pycnonotus cafer in Haridwar, India. Forktail 17: 109-110.
  6. Bibby CJ, Burgers D, Hill D (1992).
  7. Bird Census Techniques. London, UK: Academic Press.
  8. Botero-Delgadillo E, Bayly NJ (2012). Does morphology predict behavior? Correspondence between behavioral and morphometric data in a Tyrant-flycatcher (Tyrannidae) assemblage in the Santa Marta Mountains, Colombia. J Field Ornithol 83: 329-342.
  9. Brown JH (1984). On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am Nat 124: 259-279.
  10. Davies NB, Houston AI (1983). Time allocation between territories and flocks and owner-satellite conflict in foraging pied wagtails, Motacilla alba. J Anim Ecol 52: 621-634.
  11. Devictor V, Jiguet F (2007). Community richness and stability in agricultural landscapes: the importance of surrounding habitats. Agr Ecosyst Environ 120: 179-184.
  12. Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF (2001). Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe’s farmland bird populations. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 268: 25-29.
  13. Douglas DJ, Juleit AV, Tim GB (2009). Improving the value of field margins as foraging habitat for farmland birds. J App Eco 46: 353-362.
  14. Doxa A, Bas Y, Paracchini ML, Pointereau P, Terres JM, Jjiguet F (2010). Low-intensity agriculture increases farmland bird abundance. J App Eco 47: 1348-1356.
  15. Dunning JB (2007). CRC Handbook of Avian Body Masses. Second ed. Boca Raton, FL, USA/London: CRC Press,
  16. Taylor and Francis Group, NW. Feare C,