Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3

Influence of tree thinning on abundance and survival probability of small rodents in a natural deciduous forest

Pages
323–329
Publication Date
2022-11-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study suggests that treethinning could be a tool to both encourage tree productivity and create suitable habitats for small rodents.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study was conducted to investigate the influence of tree thinning on habitat variables and small rodents in a naturaldeciduous forest in South Korea.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Populations were monitored for 2 years in a natural deciduous forest subject to treethinning.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study suggests that treethinning could be a tool to both encourage tree productivity and create suitable habitats for small rodents.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate the influence of tree thinning on habitat variables and small rodents in a naturaldeciduous forest in South Korea. We focused on the populations of the small forest-dwelling rodents, striped field mouse Apodemusagrarius and Korean field mouse A. peninsulae. Populations were monitored for 2 years in a natural deciduous forest subject to treethinning. The coverage of ground vegetation and number and volume of downed trees were significantly increased after thinning.However, the coverage of overstory and understory vegetation and number of standing trees were decreased in postthinning session. Theabundance and survival probability of captured A. agrarius and the total small rodents were significantly influenced by tree thinning. Wehypothesize that the major factors determining the greater abundance and survival of small rodents after thinning may be the increasedcoverage of ground vegetation and number of downed trees, and the decreased number of standing trees. This study suggests that treethinning could be a tool to both encourage tree productivity and create suitable habitats for small rodents.

🔖

Cite This Article

LEE, J., HWANG, H., EOM, T., RHIM, S. (2022). Influence of tree thinning on abundance and survival probability of small rodents in a natural deciduous forest. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 3, 323–329. https://ajindex.com/articles/616124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Amori G, Castigliani V, Locasciulli O, Luiselli L (2015). Longterm density fluctuations and microhabitat use of sympatric Apodemus flavicollis and Myodes glareolus in central Italy. Comm Ecol 16: 196-205.
  2. Bowman J, Forbes G, Dilworth T (2001). Landscape context and small-mammal abundance in a managed forest. For Ecol Manage 140: 249-255.
  3. Buesching CD, Newman C, Twell R, Macdonald DW (2008). Reasons for arboreality in wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus and bank voles Myodes glareolus. Mamm Biol 73: 318-324.
  4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002). Model Selection and MultiModel Inference: A Practical Information-Theory Approach. New York, NY, USA: Springer. Bush ER, Buesching CD, Slade EM, Macdonald DW (2012). Woodland recovery after suppression of deer: cascade effects for small mammals, wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus) and bank voles (Myodes glareolus). PLoS One 7: e31404. Carrilho M, Teixeira D, Santos-Reis M, Rosalino LM (2017). Small mammal abundance in Mediterranean Eucalyptus plantations: how shrub cover can really make a difference. For Ecol Manage 391: 256-263.
  5. Costa FRC, Magnusson WE (2003). Effects of selective logging on the diversity and abundance of flowering and fruiting understory plants in a central Amazonian forest. Biotropica 35: 103-114.
  6. Decocq G, Aubert M, Dupont F, Bardat J, Wattez-Franger A, Saguez R, de Foucault B, Alard D, Delelis-Dusollier A (2005). Silviculture-driven vegetation change in a European temperate deciduous forest. Ann For Sci 62: 313-323.
  7. Earl JE, Harper EB, Hocking DJ, Osbourn MS, Rittenhouse TAG, Semlitsch RD (2016). Effects of timber harvest on small mammal captures in experimental forestry plots. Anim Biol 66: 347-362.
  8. Ecke F, Löfgren O, Sörlin D (2002). Population dynamics of small mammals in relation to forest age and structural habitat factors in northern Sweden. J Appl Ecol 39: 781-792.
  9. Escobar MAH, Uribe SV, Chiappe R, Estades CF (2015). Effect of clearcutting operations on the survival rate of a small mammal. PLoS One 10: e0118883. Fischer C, Schröder B (2014). Predicting spatial and temporal habitat use of rodents in a highly intensive agricultural area. Agri Ecosys Environ 189: 145-153.
  10. Fuller AK, Harrison DJ, Lachowski HJ (2004). Stand scale effects of partial harvesting and clearcutting on small mammals and forest structure. For Ecol Manage 191: 373-386.
  11. Gasperini S, Mortelliti A, Bartolommei P, Bonacchi A, Manzo E, Cozzolino R (2016). Effects of forest management on density and survival in three forest rodent species.