Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

Geographical variation in morphometry, craniometry, and diet of amammalian species (Stone marten, Martes foina) using data mining

Pages
99–106
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results showed that there is no geographical differentiation between morphometry, craniometry, and diet of the species; therefore, the species cannot be separated into subspecies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Ecologists use various data mining techniques to make predictions and estimations, to identify patterns in datasets and relationships between qualitative and quantitative variables, or to classify variables.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our results showed that there is no geographical differentiation between morphometry, craniometry, and diet of the species; therefore, the species cannot be separated into subspecies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data mining techniques could be used to examine the geographical variation of a species to support separation not subspecies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Ecologists use various data mining techniques to make predictions and estimations, to identify patterns in datasets and relationships between qualitative and quantitative variables, or to classify variables. The aim of this study was to investigate if the application of data mining could be used to study geographical variation in the morphometry, craniometry, and diet of a mammalian species (Martes foina), and to determine whether data mining can complement genetic analysis to recognize subspecies. Morphometric, craniometric, and dietary data were collected from three different geographical regions in Greece (mainland, Aegean islands, and the island of Crete), and data mining techniques were applied. Our results showed that there is no geographical differentiation between morphometry, craniometry, and diet of the species; therefore, the species cannot be separated into subspecies. Our results support preliminary results from a genetic study that annuls previous classification into three subspecies. Data mining techniques could be used to examine the geographical variation of a species to support separation not subspecies.

🔖

Cite This Article

KITIKIDOU, K., PAPAKOSTA, M. A., BAKALOUDIS, D. E., VLACHOS, C. G., CHATZINIKOS, E., ALEXANDROU, O., SAKOULIS, A. (2022). Geographical variation in morphometry, craniometry, and diet of amammalian species (Stone marten, Martes foina) using data mining. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 99–106. https://ajindex.com/articles/616115

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Alexandri P, Triantafyllidis A, Papakostas S, Chatzinikos E, Platis P, Papageorgiou N, Larson G, Abatzopoulos T, Triantaphyllidis C (2012). The Balkans and the colonization of Europe: the post glacial range expansion of the wild boar, Sus scrofa. J Biogeogr 39: 713-723.
  2. Azzaroli A (1977). Considerazioni sui mammiferi fossili delle isole mediterranee. B Zool 44: 201-211 (in Italian). Baird D, Rubach M, Van den Brinkt P (2008). Trait-based ecological risk assessment (TERA): the new frontier? Integr Environ Assess Manage 4: 2-3.
  3. Bakaloudis D, Vlachos C, Papakosta M, Bontzorlos V, Chatzinikos E (2012). Diet composition and feeding strategies of the stone marten (Martes foina) in a typical Mediterranean ecosystem. Scientific World Journal 2012: 163920. Balestrieri A, Remonti L, Capra RB, Canova L, Prigioni C (2013). Food habits of the stone marten (Martes foina) (Mammalia: Carnivora) in plain areas of Northern Italy prior to pine marten (M. martes) spreading. Ital J Zool 80: 60-68.
  4. Bate D (1905). On the mammals of Crete. P Zool Soc Lond 2: 315-323.
  5. Benton M (1980). Geographic variation in the garter snakes (Thamnophis sirtalis) of the north-central United States, a multivariate study. Zool J Linn Soc 68: 307-323.
  6. Berry M, Linoff G (2000).
  7. Mastering Data Mining. New York, NY, USA: John Wiley and Sons. Bhugra D (2013). Association rule analysis using biogeography based optimization. In: International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics, 4–6 January 2013,
  8. Coimbatore, India. Erlinge S (1977). Spacing strategy in stoat Mustela erminea. Oikos 28: 32-42.
  9. Festa E (1914). Escursioni zoologiche del Dr. Enrico Festa nell’Isola di Rodi. Tor Mus Zool Anat Compar 29: 1-29 (in Italian). Frank E, Hall M, Trigg L, Holmes G, Witten I (2004). Data mining in bioinformatics using Weka. Bioinformatics 20: 2479-2481.
  10. Genovesi P, Secchi M, Boitani L (1996). Diet of stone martens: an example of ecological flexibility. J Zool (Lond) 238: 545-555.
  11. Glusman G, Bahar A, Sharon D, Pilpel Y, White J, Lancet D (2000). The olfactory receptor gene superfamily: data mining, classification, and nomenclature. Mamm Genome11: 1016-1023.
  12. Hedrick A, Temeles E (1989). The evolution of sexual dimorphism in animals: Hypotheses and tests. Trends Ecol Evol 4: 136-138.
  13. Hofreiter M, Serre D, Rohland N, Rabeder G, Nagel D, Conard N, Mündel S, Pääbo S (2004). Lack of phylogeography in European mammals before the last glaciation. P Natl Acad Sci USA 101: 12963-12968. IBM Corporation (2011a). IBM