Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2018 / Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1

Sexual size dimorphism and sex determination by external measurements in the Redshank Tringa totanus

Pages
1–5
Publication Date
2022-11-05
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thepresented discriminant equation may be successfully used for sexing Redshanks when blood sampling is not possible, and could beapplied to samples collected in the past, providing the opportunity to re-examine results of previous analyses.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Redshank is a wader species that shows no sexual dimorphism in plumage, but some dimorphism in size.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In total, 113 males and 75 females were measured and sexedmolecularly.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thepresented discriminant equation may be successfully used for sexing Redshanks when blood sampling is not possible, and could beapplied to samples collected in the past, providing the opportunity to re-examine results of previous analyses.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The Redshank is a wader species that shows no sexual dimorphism in plumage, but some dimorphism in size. To propose amethod for sexing birds of this species by linear measurements, a discriminant function analysis was applied to a set of morphometrictraits in birds captured during the spring migration in southern Belarus. In total, 113 males and 75 females were measured and sexedmolecularly. On average, females were larger in all measurements than males. The most sexually dimorphic trait was wing length, whichwas included in the discriminant function analysis. Jackknife cross-validation showed that the provided equation allowed the correctsexing of 67% of birds (81% of males and 52% of females). When identifying birds with this discriminant function, values lower than-0.96 indicated males, while those larger than 1.17 indicated females. This allowed the correct sexing of 95% of birds of each sex. Thepresented discriminant equation may be successfully used for sexing Redshanks when blood sampling is not possible, and could beapplied to samples collected in the past, providing the opportunity to re-examine results of previous analyses.

🔖

Cite This Article

PINCHUK, P., KARLIONOVA, N., FISCHER, I., PILACKA, L., MEISSNER, W. (2022). Sexual size dimorphism and sex determination by external measurements in the Redshank Tringa totanus. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 42 - Sayı: 1, 1–5. https://ajindex.com/articles/616085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Ackerman JT, Takekawa JY, Bluso JD, Yee JL, Eagles-Smith CA (2008). Gender identification of Caspian Terns using external morphology and discriminant function analysis. Wilson J Ornithol 120: 378-383.
  2. Aguirre JI, Arana P, Antonio MT (2009). Testing effectiveness of discriminant functions to sex different populations of Mediterranean Yellow-Legged Gulls Larus michahellis michahellis. Ardeola 56: 281-286.
  3. Aradis A, Landucci G, Tagliavia M, Bultrini M (2015). Sex determination of Eurasian Woodcock Scolopax rusticola: a molecular and morphological approach. Avocetta 39: 83-89.
  4. Busse P, Meissner W (2015).
  5. Bird Ringing Station Manual. Warsaw, Poland: De Gruyter Open Ltd. EBCC. 2015. Pan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme. European Bird Census Council. Online at: http://www.ebcc. info/index.php?ID=587 (accessed 28 March 2017).
  6. Fox AD, King R (2011). Body mass loss amongst moulting Pochard Aythya ferina and Tufted Duck A. fuligula at Abberton Reservoir, South East England. J Ornithol 152: 727-732.
  7. Fridolfsson A-K, Ellegren H (1999). A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 20: 116- 121. Gates HR, Yezerinac S, Powell AN, Tomkovich PS, Valchuk OP, Lanctot RB (2013). Differentiation of subspecies and sexes of Beringian Dunlin using morphometric measures. J Field Ornithol 84: 389-402.
  8. Glutz von Blotzheim UN, Bauer KM, Bezzel E (1977). Handbuch der Vögel Mitteleuropas. VII. Wiesbaden, Germany: Akademische Verlag (in German). Hallgrimsson GT, Palsson S, Summers RW (2008). Bill length: a reliable method for sexing Purple Sandpipers. J Field Ornithol 79: 87-92.
  9. Jamieson SE (2012). Body mass dynamics during incubation and duration of parental care in Pacific Dunlins Calidris alpina pacifica: a test of the differential parental capacity hypothesis. Ibis 154: 838-845. Jiménez A, García-Lau I, Gonzalez A, Acosta M, Mugica L (2015). Sex determination of Least Sandpiper (Calidris minutilla) and Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri): comparing methodological robustness of two morphometric methods. Waterbirds 38: 10-18.
  10. Kelly JP, Warnock N, Page GW, Weathers WW (2002). Effects of weather on daily body mass regulation in wintering Dunlin. J Exp Biol 205: 109-120.
  11. Langseth I, Moe B, Bech C (2001). Reduction in body mass and basal metabolic rate in breeding female Black-legged Kittiwakes Rissa tridactyla: an adaptation to reduce maintenance costs? Atlantic Seabirds 3: 165-178.
  12. Lovich E, Gibbons JW (1992). A review of techniques for quanti