Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2

Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities

Pages
117–130
Publication Date
2022-11-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Our results indicate that the arvalis and obscurus forms are not sufficiently differentiated to be considered different species, while the Anatolian population has only recently split from the Asian population.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The common vole Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778) is the most widespread Microtus species.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It has two forms - the European arvalis form (2n: 46, NF: 84) and the Asian obscurus form (2n: 46, NF: 72).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Our results indicate that the arvalis and obscurus forms are not sufficiently differentiated to be considered different species, while the Anatolian population has only recently split from the Asian population.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The common vole Microtus arvalis (Pallas, 1778) is the most widespread Microtus species. It has two forms - the European arvalis form (2n: 46, NF: 84) and the Asian obscurus form (2n: 46, NF: 72). The present study aimed to clarify the taxonomic status of M. arvalis populations distributed in Eastern Turkey, Europe and Asia by analysing two mitochondrial (CYTB and COX1) and one nuclear (IRBP) markers. Phylogenetic dendrograms (median-joining networks and Bayesian trees) constructed using the mitochondrial markers clearly separated the Anatolian population from the European and Asian populations. Contrarily, any explicit differentiation was not shown in IRBP analyses. Mean and net genetic distance values (d) were found to be notably low for three markers. Species delimitation test (Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery Method) supported these results. Our results indicate that the arvalis and obscurus forms are not sufficiently differentiated to be considered different species, while the Anatolian population has only recently split from the Asian population. Together, these findings demonstrate that the speciation process is ongoing.

🔖

Cite This Article

MARKOV, G., CİROVİC, D., MARTON, M., YİĞİT, N., ÇOLAK, E., ÇETİNTÜRK, D. (2022). Inferring phylogenetic relationships in the common vole (Microtus arvalis) based on mitochondrial and nuclear sequence diversities. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 2, 117–130. https://ajindex.com/articles/615960

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Akhverdian MR, Liapunova EA, Vorontsov NN, Teslenko SV (1999). Intrapopulation autosomal polymorphism in the common vole Microtus arvalis from the Transcaucasian region. Genetika 35 (12): 1687-1698.
  2. Baker RJ, Bradley RD (2006). Speciation in mammals and the genetic species concept. Journal of Mammalogy 87 (4): 643-662. doi:10.1644/06-MAMM-F-038R2.1 Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Röhl A. (1999). Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16 (1): 37-48.
  3. Barbosa S, Pauperio J, Searle JB, Alves PC (2013). Genetic identification of Iberian rodent species using both mitochondrial and nuclear loci: application to noninvasive sampling. Molecular Ecology Resources 13 (1): 43-56. doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.12024
  4. Barbosa S, Paupério J, Pavlova SV, Alves PC, Searle JB (2018). The Microtus voles: Resolving the phylogeny of one of the most speciose mammalian genera using genomics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 125: 85-92. doi: 10.1016/j. ympev.2018.03.017 Borkowska A, Ratkiewicz M (2008). Sex-related spatial structure and effective population size in the common vole, Microtus arvalis, as revealed by mtDNA analysis. Annales Zoologici Fennici 45 (4): 255-262. doi: 10.5735/086.045.0403 Bradley RD, Baker RJ (2001). A test of the genetic species concept: cytochrome-b sequences and mammals. Journal of Mammalogy 82 (4): 960-973. doi: 10.1644/1545-1542(2001)082 2.0.CO;2 Bulatova N, Golenishchev F, Bystrakova N, Pavlova S, Koval’skaya J et al. (2007). Distribution and geographic limits of the alternative cytotypes of two Microtus voles in European Russia. Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 18 (1): 99-109.
  5. Bulatova NS, Golenishchev FN, Koval’skaya YM, Emelyanova LG, Bystrakova N et al. (2010). Cytogenetic study of the parapatric contact zone between two 46-chromosomal forms of the common vole in European Russia. Russian journal of genetics 46 (4): 443-448. doi: 10.1134/S1022795410040095 Bužan EV, Förster DW, Searle JB, Kryštufek B (2010). A new cytochrome b phylogroup of the common vole (Microtus arvalis) endemic to the Balkans and its implications for the evolutionary history of the species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 100 (4): 788-796.
  6. Chaval Y, Dobigny G, Michaux J, Pages M, Corbisier C et al. (2010). A multi-approach survey as the most reliable tool to accurately assess biodiversity: an example of Thai murine rodents. Kasetsart Journal (Natural Sciences) 44: 590-603.
  7. Chen JT, Qin J, Li K, Xu QY, Wang XP et