Journals / Turkish Journal of Zoology / 2021 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3

A standardised analytical framework for sampling fish communities: relevance to Turkish riverine ecosystems

Pages
241–256
Publication Date
2022-11-03
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The possibility to incorporate other measures of fish health such as biomass andcondition, and to extend the proposed framework to the quantitative assessment of vegetation and bird communities also exists.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fish communities are important indicators of the health of riverine ecosystems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Fish monitoring for The Living Murray (TLM)initiative, one of Australia’s most ambitious restoration undertakings for the degraded river-floodplain biota of the River Murray system(south-eastern Australia), was carried out annually from 2005 to 2011 across six ‘Icon Sites’, including the habitats and reaches therein.These spatial and temporal components of variation in fish community abundance and composition must be taken explicitly into accountfor consistent assessment of riverine ecosystem health.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The possibility to incorporate other measures of fish health such as biomass andcondition, and to extend the proposed framework to the quantitative assessment of vegetation and bird communities also exists.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fish communities are important indicators of the health of riverine ecosystems. Fish monitoring for The Living Murray (TLM)initiative, one of Australia’s most ambitious restoration undertakings for the degraded river-floodplain biota of the River Murray system(south-eastern Australia), was carried out annually from 2005 to 2011 across six ‘Icon Sites’, including the habitats and reaches therein.These spatial and temporal components of variation in fish community abundance and composition must be taken explicitly into accountfor consistent assessment of riverine ecosystem health. To address this requirement, a standardised analytical framework, consisting ofa sampling design and appropriate statistical methods, is outlined in this study. Based on an extensive dataset, multivariate patternsand univariate trends in fish community structure were analysed to show the flexibility, modularity and ability of the framework. Theapplicability of the framework to Turkish riverine ecosystems is then discussed with emphasis on the need for participatory discussionbetween researchers and environmental managers. The possibility to incorporate other measures of fish health such as biomass andcondition, and to extend the proposed framework to the quantitative assessment of vegetation and bird communities also exists.

🔖

Cite This Article

TARKAN, A. S., VILIZZI, L., YOĞURTÇUOĞLU, B. (2022). A standardised analytical framework for sampling fish communities: relevance to Turkish riverine ecosystems. Turkish Journal of Zoology, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 3, 241–256. https://ajindex.com/articles/615910

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Anderson AJ, Gorley RN, Clarke KR (2008). PERMANOVA+ for PRIMER: Guide to Software and Statistical Methods. Plymouth, UK: PRIMER-E Ltd. Bayçelebi E (2020). Distribution and diversity of fish from Seyhan, Ceyhan and Orontes river systems. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96: 747-767. doi: 10.3897/zse.96.55837 Boulton AJ (1999). An overview of river health assessment: philosophies, practice, problems and prognosis. Freshwater Biology 41:469-479. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.1999.00443.x Buijse AD, Coops H, Staras M, Jans LH, Van Geest GJ et al. (2002). Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshwater Biology 47: 889-907. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00915.x Burgman M (2005). Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Cattanéo F (2005). Does hydrology constrain the structure of fish assemblages in French streams? Regional scale analysis. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 164: 367-385. doi: 10.1127/0003- 9136/2005/0164-0367
  2. Çiçek E, Birecikligil S (2016). Ichthyofauna of the Turkish parts of Kura-Aras River Basin. Fishtaxa 1: 14-26. doi: 10.7508/ jft.2016.01.002 Çiçek E, Görgün A, Bağra O, Sungur S (2018). EurAsian Fish Index with web based software (EAFI 1.0). Acta Biologica Turcica 31 (4): 209-219.
  3. Copp GH (2010). Patterns of diel activity and species richness in young and small fishes of European streams: a review of 20 years of point abundance sampling by electrofishing. Fish and Fisheries 11: 439-460. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2010.00370.x Deffner J, Haase P (2018). The societal relevance of river restoration. Ecology and Society 23 (4). doi: 10.5751/ES-10530-230435
  4. Ergönül MB, Breine J, Van Der Bergh E (2018). A technical guide to develop a statistically valid fish-based index in compliance with the Water Framework Directive: an evaluation for Turkish freshwaters. International Aquatic Research 10: 303-319. doi: 10.1007/s40071-018-0209-2
  5. Ergönül MB, Breine J, Van Den Bergh E, Bahceci H (2020). Biological Assessment of some wadable rivers in Turkey using fish data; a statistical approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability 22: 7385-7425. doi: 10.1007/s10668-019-00526-x Fausch KD, Lyons J, Karr JR, Angermeier PL (1990). Fish communities as indicators of environmental degradation. American Fisheries Society Symposium 8: 123-144.
  6. Gallardo B, Clavero M, Sanchez MI, Vila M (2016). Global ecological impacts of invasive species in aquatic ecosystems. Global Ch